Daniels v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 469
Jurisdiction | Federal Jurisdiction (Canada) |
Citation | 2019 FC 469 |
Court | Federal Court (Canada) |
Date | 17 April 2019 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
2 practice notes
-
Santiago v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 198
...and evidence to establish that they require exceptional relief under s 25 of the IRPA. See Daniels v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 469 at para 32. [60] Notwithstanding the absence of any meaningful submissions, the Decision shows that the Officer made what he/she could of th......
-
Alzoubei v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration),
...including evidence specific to his children’s circumstances and best interests (Daniels v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 469 at para 32). In light of the closeness in age of the two boys, I find that the officer committed no error in undertaking a combined assessment o......
2 cases
-
Santiago v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 198
...and evidence to establish that they require exceptional relief under s 25 of the IRPA. See Daniels v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 469 at para 32. [60] Notwithstanding the absence of any meaningful submissions, the Decision shows that the Officer made what he/she could of th......
-
Alzoubei v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration),
...including evidence specific to his children’s circumstances and best interests (Daniels v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 469 at para 32). In light of the closeness in age of the two boys, I find that the officer committed no error in undertaking a combined assessment o......