Davis v Davis
| Jurisdiction | Alberta |
| Court | Court of King's Bench of Alberta (Canada) |
| Citation | 2023 ABKB 652 |
| Docket Number | 4803 183851 |
| Date | 20 November 2023 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
6 practice notes
-
Astolfi v. Stone Creek Resorts Inc.
...the parties as to its meaning after the order is made: Pawlowski at para 51, citing Yu v Jordan, 2012 BCCA 367 at para 53; Davis v Davis, 2023 ABKB 652 at para 59; Twinn v Trustee Act, 2022 ABQB 107 at para 111, rev’d on other grounds 2022 ABCA 368; Hartson v Park Paving Ltd, 2021 ABQB 742 ......
-
O'Reilly v. O'Reilly
...is made: Alberta Health Services v Pawlowski, 2022 ABCA 254 at para 51, citing Yu v Jordan, 2012 BCCA 367 at para 53; Davis v Davis, 2023 ABKB 652 at para 59; Twinn v Trustee Act, 2022 ABQB 107 at para 111; Hartson v Park Paving Ltd, 2021 ABQB 742 at para 31. Rather, a court order should be......
-
Offrey v. Offrey
...cooperative environment when moving towards shared parenting: DC v NC, 2021 ABQB 1015 at paras 209-214 (per Jones, J.); Davis v Davis, 2023 ABKB 652 (per Renke, J.). Parenting coordinators are also often utilized for major decisions relating to the best interests of the child such as design......
-
Offrey v Offrey
...cooperative environment when moving towards shared parenting: DC v NC, 2021 ABQB 1015 at paras 209–214 (per Jones, J.); Davis v Davis, 2023 ABKB 652 (per Renke, J.). Parenting coordinators are also often utilized for major decisions relating to the best interests of the child such as design......
Get Started for Free
6 cases
-
Astolfi v. Stone Creek Resorts Inc.
...the parties as to its meaning after the order is made: Pawlowski at para 51, citing Yu v Jordan, 2012 BCCA 367 at para 53; Davis v Davis, 2023 ABKB 652 at para 59; Twinn v Trustee Act, 2022 ABQB 107 at para 111, rev’d on other grounds 2022 ABCA 368; Hartson v Park Paving Ltd, 2021 ABQB 742 ......
-
O'Reilly v. O'Reilly
...is made: Alberta Health Services v Pawlowski, 2022 ABCA 254 at para 51, citing Yu v Jordan, 2012 BCCA 367 at para 53; Davis v Davis, 2023 ABKB 652 at para 59; Twinn v Trustee Act, 2022 ABQB 107 at para 111; Hartson v Park Paving Ltd, 2021 ABQB 742 at para 31. Rather, a court order should be......
-
Offrey v. Offrey
...cooperative environment when moving towards shared parenting: DC v NC, 2021 ABQB 1015 at paras 209-214 (per Jones, J.); Davis v Davis, 2023 ABKB 652 (per Renke, J.). Parenting coordinators are also often utilized for major decisions relating to the best interests of the child such as design......
-
Offrey v Offrey
...cooperative environment when moving towards shared parenting: DC v NC, 2021 ABQB 1015 at paras 209–214 (per Jones, J.); Davis v Davis, 2023 ABKB 652 (per Renke, J.). Parenting coordinators are also often utilized for major decisions relating to the best interests of the child such as design......
Get Started for Free
