Debut Developments Incorporated v. Redcliff (Town)

CourtCourt of Appeal (Alberta)
JudgeAntonio; Ho; Feth
Judgment Date23 June 2025
Citation2025 ABCA 223
Docket Number2201-0318AC
Date23 June 2025

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
4 practice notes
  • Nova Oculus Canada Manufacturing ULC v. Sather
    • Canada
    • Court of King's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • December 22, 2025
    ...an application for relief not expressly applied for in appropriate circumstances: Debut Developments Incorporated v Redcliff (Town), 2025 ABCA 223 at para 18; Judicature Act, RSA 2000, c J-2, s 8; Alberta Rules of Court, Alta Reg 124/2010 (Rules), rules, r 1.2-1.4; Pyrrha Design Inc v Plum ......
  • 26th Avenue River Holding Limited Partnership v. Winspia Co Ltd
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Alberta)
    • November 19, 2025
    ...v Calgary (Subdivision and Development Appeal Board), 2023 ABCA 133 at paras 17-18; Debut Developments Incorporated v Redcliff (Town), 2025 ABCA 223 at para 12. While the distinctions identified by the appellant may have scope to operate within the test for permission to appeal, they do not......
  • Davlyn Corporation Ltd v. Latium Fleet Management Inc.
    • Canada
    • Court of King's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • April 28, 2026
    ...The Alberta Court of Appeal cited Pyrrha Design with approval in its recent decision Debut Developments Incorporated v Redcliff (Town), 2025 ABCA 223 at par. [66]        I agree with Airways’ submissions that this Court has the jurisdiction to award dismis......
  • Boucher v. Bailey
    • Canada
    • Court of King's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • June 25, 2025
    ...will continue should this trial be delayed: Debut Developments Incorporated v the Town of Redcliff, 2022 ABKB 809 at para 39, aff’d 2025 ABCA 223. [19]        Moreover, prejudice extends beyond the impact on the parties of granting or denying an adjournmen......
5 cases
  • Nova Oculus Canada Manufacturing ULC v. Sather
    • Canada
    • Court of King's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • December 22, 2025
    ...an application for relief not expressly applied for in appropriate circumstances: Debut Developments Incorporated v Redcliff (Town), 2025 ABCA 223 at para 18; Judicature Act, RSA 2000, c J-2, s 8; Alberta Rules of Court, Alta Reg 124/2010 (Rules), rules, r 1.2-1.4; Pyrrha Design Inc v Plum ......
  • Farm Credit Canada v. Wiebe
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Alberta)
    • July 7, 2026
    ...even when the decision may impact substantive rights”: 26th Avenue, para 9; see also Debut Developments Incorporated v Redcliff (Town), 2025 ABCA 223, para 12. [25]        The Court rejected the appellant’s arguments that permission should not be required ......
  • 26th Avenue River Holding Limited Partnership v. Winspia Co Ltd
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Alberta)
    • November 19, 2025
    ...v Calgary (Subdivision and Development Appeal Board), 2023 ABCA 133 at paras 17-18; Debut Developments Incorporated v Redcliff (Town), 2025 ABCA 223 at para 12. While the distinctions identified by the appellant may have scope to operate within the test for permission to appeal, they do not......
  • Davlyn Corporation Ltd v. Latium Fleet Management Inc.
    • Canada
    • Court of King's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • April 28, 2026
    ...The Alberta Court of Appeal cited Pyrrha Design with approval in its recent decision Debut Developments Incorporated v Redcliff (Town), 2025 ABCA 223 at par. [66]        I agree with Airways’ submissions that this Court has the jurisdiction to award dismis......
  • Get Started for Free