Denis v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2018 FC 1182
| Jurisdiction | Federal Jurisdiction (Canada) |
| Court | Federal Court (Canada) |
| Citation | 2018 FC 1182 |
| Date | 26 November 2018 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
18 practice notes
-
Warrich v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2022 FC 76
...is a Convention refugee or a person in need of protection (Huruglica at paras 58–60; Denis v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2018 FC 1182 at para 39). [21] Further to my review of the Decision, I am not persuaded that the RAD failed to carry out an independent analysis of all the evid......
-
Gomes v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 506
...Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) v Huruglica, 2016 FCA 93, [2016] 4 FCR 157 [Huruglica]; Denis v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2018 FC 1182 at paras 37-39; Ali v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2016 FC 396 at para 4 [Ali]). It must consider the RPD’s findings carefully and......
-
Bishop v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2022 FC 569
...(Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) v Huruglica, 2016 FCA 93 [Huruglica] at para 58; Denis v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2018 FC 1182 at para 39). That said, it must be stressed that an appeal before the RAD is not a true de novo proceeding. Indeed, the RAD does not start anew, ......
-
Warsame v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 920
...a reasonableness standard as the question of identity is essentially a fact-driven analysis (Denis v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2018 FC 1182 [Denis]). The RAD’s refusal to admit new evidence under subsection 110(4) of the IRPA will also be reviewed on a reasonableness standard (C......
Request a trial to view additional results
17 cases
-
Warrich v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2022 FC 76
...is a Convention refugee or a person in need of protection (Huruglica at paras 58–60; Denis v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2018 FC 1182 at para 39). [21] Further to my review of the Decision, I am not persuaded that the RAD failed to carry out an independent analysis of all the evid......
-
Gomes v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 506
...Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) v Huruglica, 2016 FCA 93, [2016] 4 FCR 157 [Huruglica]; Denis v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2018 FC 1182 at paras 37-39; Ali v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2016 FC 396 at para 4 [Ali]). It must consider the RPD’s findings carefully and......
-
Bishop v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2022 FC 569
...(Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) v Huruglica, 2016 FCA 93 [Huruglica] at para 58; Denis v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2018 FC 1182 at para 39). That said, it must be stressed that an appeal before the RAD is not a true de novo proceeding. Indeed, the RAD does not start anew, ......
-
Warsame v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 920
...a reasonableness standard as the question of identity is essentially a fact-driven analysis (Denis v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2018 FC 1182 [Denis]). The RAD’s refusal to admit new evidence under subsection 110(4) of the IRPA will also be reviewed on a reasonableness standard (C......
Request a trial to view additional results