Dexter Road Development Corp. v. ltkine et al., 2015 ONCA 81
| Jurisdiction | Ontario |
| Judge | Feldman, Cronk and Hourigan, JJ.A. |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Ontario) |
| Subject Matter | STATUTES,CONTRACTS,PRACTICE |
| Citation | 2015 ONCA 81,[2015] O.A.C. Uned. 50 (CA),[2015] O.A.C. Uned. 50 |
| Date | 22 January 2015 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
2 practice notes
-
Lapolla v. The Estate of John Bostock, 2017 ONSC 7448
...would be effective only if the provisions of the Planning Act were complied with. Also see Dexter Road Development Corp. v. Itkine, 2015 ONCA 81, 50 R.P.R. (5th) 36.[89] It is not a violation of the Planning Act to enter into a non-compliant agreement that expressly states that its operatio......
-
Court Of Appeal Summaries (February 2-6, 2015)
...pleadings on "proper evidence". The appellant chose not to pursue that avenue in a timely manner. Dexter Road Development Corp. v. Itkine, 2015 ONCA 81 [Feldman, Cronk and Hourigan Christie, for the appellants D. Gerson, for the respondents in the Leach Proceedings Drudi, for the respondent......
1 cases
-
Lapolla v. The Estate of John Bostock, 2017 ONSC 7448
...would be effective only if the provisions of the Planning Act were complied with. Also see Dexter Road Development Corp. v. Itkine, 2015 ONCA 81, 50 R.P.R. (5th) 36.[89] It is not a violation of the Planning Act to enter into a non-compliant agreement that expressly states that its operatio......
1 firm's commentaries
-
Court Of Appeal Summaries (February 2-6, 2015)
...pleadings on "proper evidence". The appellant chose not to pursue that avenue in a timely manner. Dexter Road Development Corp. v. Itkine, 2015 ONCA 81 [Feldman, Cronk and Hourigan Christie, for the appellants D. Gerson, for the respondents in the Leach Proceedings Drudi, for the respondent......