DHMK Properties Inc. v. 2296608 Ontario Inc.

JurisdictionOntario
CourtCourt of Appeal (Ontario)
JudgeRouleau, Benotto and Roberts JJ.A.
Citation2017 ONCA 961
Docket NumberC63805
Date07 December 2017

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
11 practice notes
  • Christine Elliott v. Saverio Montemarano
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • November 9, 2020
    ...the market price or the resale price after which the burden passes to the purchaser. I note that the decision in DHMK was overturned at 2017 ONCA 961 (although not specifically on this basis.) [72] I was not referred to any appellate authority for the proposition that the seller must provid......
  • Lecco Ridge Developments Inc., v. Vaquero
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • November 24, 2022
    ...circumstances known at the time to exist. See DHMK Properties Inc. v. 2296608 Ontario Inc., 2017 ONSC 2432, reversed on other grounds, 2017 ONCA 961. [63]                 In my view the Defendants have not estab......
  • Wynn v Kentris
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • June 11, 2024
    ...circumstances known at the time to exist. See DHMK Properties Inc. v. 2296608 Ontario Inc., 2017 ONSC 2432, reversed on other grounds, 2017 ONCA 961. 81 The Defendants' argument is that in this case “reasonable mitigation” was for the Plaintiffs to accept their offer of a vendor take-back m......
  • Marshall v. Meirik
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • March 8, 2021
    ...of DHMK Properties Inc. v. 2296608 Ontario Inc., 2017 ONSC 2432, 279 A.C.W.S. (3d) 296, at para. 15; rev’d on other grounds, at 2017 ONCA 961). The defendants suggested that this was justified because of the unusual circumstances of this case in which the Property was re-sold and the closin......
  • Get Started for Free
10 cases
  • Christine Elliott v. Saverio Montemarano
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • November 9, 2020
    ...the market price or the resale price after which the burden passes to the purchaser. I note that the decision in DHMK was overturned at 2017 ONCA 961 (although not specifically on this basis.) [72] I was not referred to any appellate authority for the proposition that the seller must provid......
  • Lecco Ridge Developments Inc., v. Vaquero
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • November 24, 2022
    ...circumstances known at the time to exist. See DHMK Properties Inc. v. 2296608 Ontario Inc., 2017 ONSC 2432, reversed on other grounds, 2017 ONCA 961. [63]                 In my view the Defendants have not estab......
  • Wynn v Kentris
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • June 11, 2024
    ...circumstances known at the time to exist. See DHMK Properties Inc. v. 2296608 Ontario Inc., 2017 ONSC 2432, reversed on other grounds, 2017 ONCA 961. 81 The Defendants' argument is that in this case “reasonable mitigation” was for the Plaintiffs to accept their offer of a vendor take-back m......
  • Marshall v. Meirik
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • March 8, 2021
    ...of DHMK Properties Inc. v. 2296608 Ontario Inc., 2017 ONSC 2432, 279 A.C.W.S. (3d) 296, at para. 15; rev’d on other grounds, at 2017 ONCA 961). The defendants suggested that this was justified because of the unusual circumstances of this case in which the Property was re-sold and the closin......
  • Get Started for Free
1 firm's commentaries
  • Top 5 Civil Appeals From The Court Of Appeal (January 2018)
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • January 16, 2018
    ...order from trial. Further, Benotto J.A. disagreed that such a motion would have succeeded. DHMK Properties Inc. v. 2296608 Ontario Inc., 2017 ONCA 961 (Rouleau, Benotto and Roberts JJ.A.), December 7, This appeal emphasizes the important damages principle that the injured party should be pu......