Dirk v Toews, 2020 ABQB 16
| Judge | Honourable Madam Justice Janice R. Ashcroft |
| Citation | 2020 ABQB 16 |
| Docket Number | 1101 10516 |
| Court | Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada) |
| Date | 08 January 2020 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
5 practice notes
-
GO Community Centre v Clark Builders and Stantec Consulting Ltd, 2020 ABQB 203
...for inflation may be further increased by a multiplier: Geophysical Service at paras 32-33; R&R Consilium at para 70; Dirk v Toews, 2020 ABQB 16, Ashcroft J at para (b) Some Inflation Adjustment Issues [105] Three issues beset the inflation-adjustment approach. (i) Deference to the Legi......
-
TAM v MOG,
...a formal settlement offer having costs consequences: Allen (Next Friend of) v Mueller, 2006 ABCA 101 at paras 15-17 [Allen]; Dirk v Toews, 2020 ABQB 16 at paras 12-14. A formal offer must not be made for the sole purpose of invoking the double costs sanction; it must reflect the relative me......
-
Dirk v Toews,
...from the Order of The Honourable Madam Justice J.R. Ashcroft Dated the 8th day of January, 2020 Filed on the 14th day of April, 2020 (2020 ABQB 16, Docket: 1101 Memorandum of Judgment _______________________________________________________ The Court: I. &......
-
Evolution Of Costs Awards In Alberta And Recent Amendments To Schedule C
...2018, Woolley J. adjusted Column 5 by that amount. This reasoning has recently made its way into a personal injury claim. In Dirk v Toews, 2020 ABQB 16, following what was otherwise a very standard trial dealing with liability and damages arising from a motorcycle collision, Madam Justice J......
Request a trial to view additional results
4 cases
-
GO Community Centre v Clark Builders and Stantec Consulting Ltd, 2020 ABQB 203
...for inflation may be further increased by a multiplier: Geophysical Service at paras 32-33; R&R Consilium at para 70; Dirk v Toews, 2020 ABQB 16, Ashcroft J at para (b) Some Inflation Adjustment Issues [105] Three issues beset the inflation-adjustment approach. (i) Deference to the Legi......
-
TAM v MOG,
...a formal settlement offer having costs consequences: Allen (Next Friend of) v Mueller, 2006 ABCA 101 at paras 15-17 [Allen]; Dirk v Toews, 2020 ABQB 16 at paras 12-14. A formal offer must not be made for the sole purpose of invoking the double costs sanction; it must reflect the relative me......
-
Dirk v Toews,
...from the Order of The Honourable Madam Justice J.R. Ashcroft Dated the 8th day of January, 2020 Filed on the 14th day of April, 2020 (2020 ABQB 16, Docket: 1101 Memorandum of Judgment _______________________________________________________ The Court: I. &......
-
Dirk v Toews, 2020 ABQB 362
...After receiving oral and written argument on costs, I issued a written decision regarding costs reported at Dirk v Toews, 2020 ABQB 16. At the end of that decision, I directed the parties to the assessment officer to resolve any remaining issues concerning fees and disbursements. The partie......
1 firm's commentaries
-
Evolution Of Costs Awards In Alberta And Recent Amendments To Schedule C
...2018, Woolley J. adjusted Column 5 by that amount. This reasoning has recently made its way into a personal injury claim. In Dirk v Toews, 2020 ABQB 16, following what was otherwise a very standard trial dealing with liability and damages arising from a motorcycle collision, Madam Justice J......