Djermanovic v. McKenzie,

JurisdictionOntario
JudgeBroad, J.
CourtSuperior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
Citation2014 ONSC 1335,[2014] O.T.C. Uned. 1335,[2014] O.T.C. Uned. 1335 (SC)
Date28 February 2014

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
5 practice notes
  • Court Of Appeal Summaries (April 20 ' 24, 2020)
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • May 4, 2020
    ...O.A.C. 249 (Div Ct.), rev'd on other grounds, 2008 ONCA 877, 94 O.R. (3d) 276, McLean v. Knox, 2013 ONCA 357, Djermanovic v. McKenzie, 2014 ONSC 1335, R. v. Krause, [1986] 2 S.C.R. 466, R. v. F. (J.E.) (1993), 16 O.R. (3d) 1 (C.A.), R. v. Bouhsass (2003), 169 C.C.C. (3d) 444 (Ont. C.A.), R.......
  • Girao v. Cunningham,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Ontario)
    • April 21, 2020
    ...or to the psychological effects of a motor vehicle accident that lack objective markers. See for example Djermanovic v. McKenzie, 2014 ONSC 1335, 32 C.C.L.I. (5th) 96, at para. [120] Can the holdings from McLean and Kitchenham be reconciled? I do not read them to be inconsistent. Kitchenham......
  • Parmar v. Beach,
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • January 9, 2017
    ...complaints are subjective in nature, credibility is of primary importance in assessing the threshold: Djermanovic v. McKenzie, 2014 ONSC 1335, 32 C.C.L.I. (5th) 96, at para. Application of the Law to the Facts [21] Upon application of the legal principles expressed in s. 267(15) of the Insu......
  • Castro v Chen,
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • November 28, 2024
    ...less serious. However, where there are no objective data, the issue of credibility is of particular importance: Djermanovic v. Mckenzie, 2014 ONSC 1335 at para. 41 Dr. Rotundo, Dr. Chan, Dr. Maria, Ms. Ramnaraine, and Dr. Pilowski all relied to a significant degree on Ms. Castro's self-repo......
  • Get Started for Free
4 cases
  • Girao v. Cunningham,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Ontario)
    • April 21, 2020
    ...or to the psychological effects of a motor vehicle accident that lack objective markers. See for example Djermanovic v. McKenzie, 2014 ONSC 1335, 32 C.C.L.I. (5th) 96, at para. [120] Can the holdings from McLean and Kitchenham be reconciled? I do not read them to be inconsistent. Kitchenham......
  • Parmar v. Beach,
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • January 9, 2017
    ...complaints are subjective in nature, credibility is of primary importance in assessing the threshold: Djermanovic v. McKenzie, 2014 ONSC 1335, 32 C.C.L.I. (5th) 96, at para. Application of the Law to the Facts [21] Upon application of the legal principles expressed in s. 267(15) of the Insu......
  • Castro v Chen,
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • November 28, 2024
    ...less serious. However, where there are no objective data, the issue of credibility is of particular importance: Djermanovic v. Mckenzie, 2014 ONSC 1335 at para. 41 Dr. Rotundo, Dr. Chan, Dr. Maria, Ms. Ramnaraine, and Dr. Pilowski all relied to a significant degree on Ms. Castro's self-repo......
  • Parmar v. Beach,
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • January 9, 2017
    ...complaints are subjective in nature, credibility is of primary importance in assessing the threshold: Djermanovic v. McKenzie, 2014 ONSC 1335, 32 C.C.L.I. (5th) 96, at para. Application of the Law to the Facts Upon application of the legal principles expressed in s. 267(15) of the Insurance......
1 firm's commentaries
  • Court Of Appeal Summaries (April 20 ' 24, 2020)
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • May 4, 2020
    ...O.A.C. 249 (Div Ct.), rev'd on other grounds, 2008 ONCA 877, 94 O.R. (3d) 276, McLean v. Knox, 2013 ONCA 357, Djermanovic v. McKenzie, 2014 ONSC 1335, R. v. Krause, [1986] 2 S.C.R. 466, R. v. F. (J.E.) (1993), 16 O.R. (3d) 1 (C.A.), R. v. Bouhsass (2003), 169 C.C.C. (3d) 444 (Ont. C.A.), R.......