DM v SP
| Jurisdiction | Alberta |
| Court | Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada) |
| Judge | Honourable Mr. Justice M. J. Lema |
| Neutral Citation | 2021 ABQB 738 |
| Citation | 2021 ABQB 738 |
| Docket Number | FL03 45228 |
| Date | 15 September 2021 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
6 practice notes
-
Hatt v Heather
...disclosure, in the circumstances here, would bar retroactive adjustment to child support based on any such decrease(s). See DM v SP, 2021 ABQB 738 (paras 15-65), ... per Colucci [v Colucci, 2021 SCC 24] what matters here is the father’s income disclosure to the mother. On that front, he did......
-
Safari v. Bigharaz
...by the Supreme Court of Canada (SCC) in Colucci v Colucci, 2021 SCC 24, a divorce case but applicable to matters under the FLA (DM v SP, 2021 ABQB 738) and summarized in Savoie v Lambert, 2024 ABKB 422. Such proper amount of support for each year since the date of retroactivity must be calc......
-
Kelly v Gammon
...support, under the still-prevailing test in Hunt v Smolis-Hunt (cited above). (On this aspect, see also my similar conclusion in DM v SP, 2021 ABQB 738 -- paras [45] All to say: the husband’s income, for interim-spousal-support purposes, is appropriately gauged, at present, at zero, in ligh......
-
Bothe v Bothe
...income that they are earning, which is the basic principle of child support calculation: see Janiten, supra at para. 20-21; DM v SP, 2021 ABQB 738 at paras [27] Ms. Davis submits that Mr. Bothe’s income is not real, but one of choi......
Get Started for Free
6 cases
-
Hatt v Heather
...disclosure, in the circumstances here, would bar retroactive adjustment to child support based on any such decrease(s). See DM v SP, 2021 ABQB 738 (paras 15-65), ... per Colucci [v Colucci, 2021 SCC 24] what matters here is the father’s income disclosure to the mother. On that front, he did......
-
Safari v. Bigharaz
...by the Supreme Court of Canada (SCC) in Colucci v Colucci, 2021 SCC 24, a divorce case but applicable to matters under the FLA (DM v SP, 2021 ABQB 738) and summarized in Savoie v Lambert, 2024 ABKB 422. Such proper amount of support for each year since the date of retroactivity must be calc......
-
Kelly v Gammon
...support, under the still-prevailing test in Hunt v Smolis-Hunt (cited above). (On this aspect, see also my similar conclusion in DM v SP, 2021 ABQB 738 -- paras [45] All to say: the husband’s income, for interim-spousal-support purposes, is appropriately gauged, at present, at zero, in ligh......
-
Bothe v Bothe
...income that they are earning, which is the basic principle of child support calculation: see Janiten, supra at para. 20-21; DM v SP, 2021 ABQB 738 at paras [27] Ms. Davis submits that Mr. Bothe’s income is not real, but one of choi......
Get Started for Free
