Doell v. Prentice, 2018 BCSC 1115

JudgeHonourable Mr. Justice Kelleher
CourtSupreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
Case DateJuly 05, 2018
JurisdictionBritish Columbia
Citations2018 BCSC 1115
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
9 practice notes
  • Sperring v Shutiak,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (British Columbia)
    • February 3, 2023
    ...result in substantial unfairness. A working arrangement to the same effect, even without an express agreement, as in Doell v. Prentice, 2018 BCSC 1115, may also be 115 Similarly, a trial judge may consider the fact that parties agreed not to marry so as to avoid statutory provisions for the......
  • Y.L. v. G.L., 2020 BCSC 808
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • May 29, 2020
    ...She argues that I should follow a line of authorities, including P.N.K. v. C.L., 2013 BCSC 1856 at paras. 86-88; Doell v. Prentice, 2018 BCSC 1115; and J.C. v. W.A., 2016 BCSC 1012 at paras. 106-109, in which the applicability of oral agreements is limited to consideration under s.95 as to ......
  • B.L.S. v. D.J.S.,
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • July 6, 2021
    ...affairs largely separate: para. 107. Brundrett J. divided the property 75/25 in favour of the claimant. [93] In Doell v. Prentice, 2018 BCSC 1115 [Doell], the parties’ 23-year relationship ended two years after the FLA came into force. Mr. Justice Kelleher found that there was an oral agree......
  • Mao v. Rao,
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • October 22, 2021
    ...pursuant to s. 95(2): Storey v. Terry, 2019 BCSC 674 [Storey] at para. 52, aff’d 2020 BCCA 30; Doell v. Prentice, 2018 BCSC 1115 [Doell] at [52]        Turning briefly to the doctrine of promissory estoppel, this doctrine “occurs wh......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
9 cases
  • Y.L. v. G.L., 2020 BCSC 808
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • May 29, 2020
    ...She argues that I should follow a line of authorities, including P.N.K. v. C.L., 2013 BCSC 1856 at paras. 86-88; Doell v. Prentice, 2018 BCSC 1115; and J.C. v. W.A., 2016 BCSC 1012 at paras. 106-109, in which the applicability of oral agreements is limited to consideration under s.95 as to ......
  • Sperring v Shutiak,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (British Columbia)
    • February 3, 2023
    ...result in substantial unfairness. A working arrangement to the same effect, even without an express agreement, as in Doell v. Prentice, 2018 BCSC 1115, may also be 115 Similarly, a trial judge may consider the fact that parties agreed not to marry so as to avoid statutory provisions for the......
  • B.L.S. v. D.J.S.,
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • July 6, 2021
    ...affairs largely separate: para. 107. Brundrett J. divided the property 75/25 in favour of the claimant. [93] In Doell v. Prentice, 2018 BCSC 1115 [Doell], the parties’ 23-year relationship ended two years after the FLA came into force. Mr. Justice Kelleher found that there was an oral agree......
  • Mao v. Rao,
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • October 22, 2021
    ...pursuant to s. 95(2): Storey v. Terry, 2019 BCSC 674 [Storey] at para. 52, aff’d 2020 BCCA 30; Doell v. Prentice, 2018 BCSC 1115 [Doell] at [52]        Turning briefly to the doctrine of promissory estoppel, this doctrine “occurs wh......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT