Dosanjh v. Lalli,
| Jurisdiction | British Columbia |
| Judge | The Honourable Chief Justice Bauman,The Honourable Madam Justice Dickson,The Honourable Mr. Justice Hunter |
| Neutral Citation | 2021 BCCA 204 |
| Citation | 2021 BCCA 204 |
| Date | 21 May 2021 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (British Columbia) |
| Docket Number | CA46960 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
4 practice notes
-
2023 BCSC 901,
...v. McLachlan, 2013 BCSC 1733. [Emphasis added.] [103] These considerations have been applied in many cases. In Dosanjh v. Lalli, 2021 BCCA 204, this Court set aside the approval of a non-arm's length sale to the respondent's parents and granted an order for joint conduct of sale. ......
-
DeThomas v DeThomas,
...v. McLachlan, 2013 BCSC 1733. [Emphasis added.] [103] These considerations have been applied in many cases. In Dosanjh v. Lalli, 2021 BCCA 204, this Court set aside the approval of a non-arm's length sale to the respondent's parents and granted an order for joint conduct of sale. ......
-
2023 BCSC 993,
...which means that proof of necessity or proof of expedience is sufficient. 36 Our Court of Appeal recently confirmed in Dosanjh v. Lalli, 2021 BCCA 204 at paragraph 33 that where necessity is not in issue, a court-ordered sale of property must be advantageous to both parties in order to qual......
-
Brar v Brar,
...which means that proof of necessity or proof of expedience is sufficient. 36 Our Court of Appeal recently confirmed in Dosanjh v. Lalli, 2021 BCCA 204 at paragraph 33 that where necessity is not in issue, a court-ordered sale of property must be advantageous to both parties in order to qual......
4 cases
-
2023 BCSC 901,
...v. McLachlan, 2013 BCSC 1733. [Emphasis added.] [103] These considerations have been applied in many cases. In Dosanjh v. Lalli, 2021 BCCA 204, this Court set aside the approval of a non-arm's length sale to the respondent's parents and granted an order for joint conduct of sale. ......
-
DeThomas v DeThomas,
...v. McLachlan, 2013 BCSC 1733. [Emphasis added.] [103] These considerations have been applied in many cases. In Dosanjh v. Lalli, 2021 BCCA 204, this Court set aside the approval of a non-arm's length sale to the respondent's parents and granted an order for joint conduct of sale. ......
-
2023 BCSC 993,
...which means that proof of necessity or proof of expedience is sufficient. 36 Our Court of Appeal recently confirmed in Dosanjh v. Lalli, 2021 BCCA 204 at paragraph 33 that where necessity is not in issue, a court-ordered sale of property must be advantageous to both parties in order to qual......
-
Brar v Brar,
...which means that proof of necessity or proof of expedience is sufficient. 36 Our Court of Appeal recently confirmed in Dosanjh v. Lalli, 2021 BCCA 204 at paragraph 33 that where necessity is not in issue, a court-ordered sale of property must be advantageous to both parties in order to qual......