Doukhobor Heritage Retreat Society #1999 v. Vancouver Foundation, 2020 BCCA 80
| Jurisdiction | British Columbia |
| Judge | The Honourable Madam Justice Fenlon,The Honourable Madam Justice Dickson,The Honourable Mr. Justice Butler |
| Citation | 2020 BCCA 80 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (British Columbia) |
| Docket Number | CA45883 |
| Date | 10 March 2020 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
4 practice notes
-
Aarts-Chinyanta v. Harmony Premium Motors Ltd., 2020 BCSC 953
...of the act, the object of the act, and the intention of Parliament: Doukhobor Heritage Retreat Society #1999 v. Vancouver Foundation, 2020 BCCA 80 at para. 42, citing Teal Cedar Products Ltd. v. British Columbia, 2017 SCC 32 at para. [33] The relevant legislative provisions are ss. 74, 83, ......
-
Siverston v. Griffin, 2020 BCSC 528
...interpretation. As noted by Butler J.A., writing for the Court, in Doukhobor Heritage Retreat Society #1999 v. Vancouver Foundation, 2020 BCCA 80 at para. 42: [42] That principle is clearly described in the dissent (but not on this point) in Teal Cedar Products Ltd. v. British Columbia, 201......
-
Bajwa v. Habib, 2020 BCCA 230
...1 S.C.R. 759 at 775. These tests were summarized by Butler J.A. in Doukhobor Heritage Retreat Society #1999 v. Vancouver Foundation, 2020 BCCA 80 at para. 1. Fresh evidence should not be admitted on appeal if, by due diligence, it could have been adduced at trial. 2. Fresh evidence is not a......
-
L.A.F. v. G.M.F.C. Ltd.,
...statutory interpretation remains the guiding principle for our courts: Doukhobor Heritage Retreat Society #1999 v. Vancouver Foundation, 2020 BCCA 80 at para. 42, citing Teal Cedar Products Ltd. v. British Columbia, 2017 SCC 32 at para. [33] Section......
4 cases
-
Aarts-Chinyanta v. Harmony Premium Motors Ltd., 2020 BCSC 953
...of the act, the object of the act, and the intention of Parliament: Doukhobor Heritage Retreat Society #1999 v. Vancouver Foundation, 2020 BCCA 80 at para. 42, citing Teal Cedar Products Ltd. v. British Columbia, 2017 SCC 32 at para. [33] The relevant legislative provisions are ss. 74, 83, ......
-
Siverston v. Griffin, 2020 BCSC 528
...interpretation. As noted by Butler J.A., writing for the Court, in Doukhobor Heritage Retreat Society #1999 v. Vancouver Foundation, 2020 BCCA 80 at para. 42: [42] That principle is clearly described in the dissent (but not on this point) in Teal Cedar Products Ltd. v. British Columbia, 201......
-
Bajwa v. Habib, 2020 BCCA 230
...1 S.C.R. 759 at 775. These tests were summarized by Butler J.A. in Doukhobor Heritage Retreat Society #1999 v. Vancouver Foundation, 2020 BCCA 80 at para. 1. Fresh evidence should not be admitted on appeal if, by due diligence, it could have been adduced at trial. 2. Fresh evidence is not a......
-
L.A.F. v. G.M.F.C. Ltd.,
...statutory interpretation remains the guiding principle for our courts: Doukhobor Heritage Retreat Society #1999 v. Vancouver Foundation, 2020 BCCA 80 at para. 42, citing Teal Cedar Products Ltd. v. British Columbia, 2017 SCC 32 at para. [33] Section......