Dubé v RCMP

JurisdictionAlberta
CourtCourt of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
JudgeHonourable Madam Justice J. A. Fagnan
Neutral Citation2021 ABQB 451
Citation2021 ABQB 451
Date10 June 2021
Docket Number0803 07953

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
3 practice notes
  • Benison v McKinnon
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • October 26, 2021
    ...and outrageous”.  [22]        The recent Alberta cases of Dubé v RCMP, 2021 ABQB 451 and Sun v Huang, 2021 ABQB 782 both confirm the three part test for IIMS, but do not consider what conduct amounts to flagrant and outrageous. As with a n......
  • Layeghpour v Deederly
    • Canada
    • Alberta Court of Justice
    • August 26, 2025
    ...is not required as a matter of law: Ahluwalia, supra at paras 70, 113–117; See also Saadati, supra at para 38. 111 McLean, supra. 112 2021 ABQB 451, at para 113 Dubé, supra at paras 158–159. 114 Transcript of proceedings, October 24, 2024, page 139, lines 3 – 13. 115 Transcript of proceedin......
  • Lavoie v Lavoie
    • Canada
    • Court of King's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • February 13, 2025
    ...of what is right or decent.” 31 With respect to the requirement for “visible and provable illness”, Justice Fagnan in Dubé v GRC, 2021 ABQB 451 at para 157, confirmed psychological upset is not enough. “A mental injury is a serious and prolonged disturbance going beyond the annoyances, anxi......
1 cases
  • Benison v McKinnon
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • October 26, 2021
    ...and outrageous”.  [22]        The recent Alberta cases of Dubé v RCMP, 2021 ABQB 451 and Sun v Huang, 2021 ABQB 782 both confirm the three part test for IIMS, but do not consider what conduct amounts to flagrant and outrageous. As with a n......