Dudley v. British Columbia et al.
| Jurisdiction | British Columbia |
| Court | Court of Appeal (British Columbia) |
| Judge | Neilson, Garson and Fitch, JJ.A. |
| Citation | 2016 BCCA 328 |
| Date | 25 July 2016 |
| Subject Matter | EVIDENCE,PRACTICE |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
6 practice notes
-
Privilege
...“substantial purpose” of litigation was not sufficient. 172 Lizotte , ibid at paras 34, 36, 37. 173 Dudley Estate v British Columbia , 2016 BCCA 328 at paras 37, 107. 174 Lizotte , supra note 6 at para 20. 175 Blank , supra note 54 at paras 28, 32. 176 Lizotte , supra note 6 at para 64. Cop......
-
Table of cases
...155 Ducharme , R v , 2004 MBCA 29 ...................................................456 Dudley Estate v British Columbia , 2016 BCCA 328 ..................... 508, 510, 511, 512 Dueck , R v , 2011 SKCA 45 ...................................................... 294 Duff , R v , 1994 CanLII 6......
-
Privileges, Protections, and Immunities
...privilege. 138 Ibid at para 52. Gascon J’s reasoning echoes that of the British Columbia Court of Appeal in Dudley v British Columbia , 2016 BCCA 328 at para 84: “To give effect to the interests the privilege is designed to serve, it must, once established, operate as against any person see......
-
Table of cases
...20 Drumonde v Moniz (1997), 105 OAC 295.......................................................... 252 Dudley v British Columbia, 2016 BCCA 328 ..................................................... 322 Dulong v Merrill Lynch Canada Inc (2006), 80 OR (3d) 378 (SCJ) .................. 252 THE ......
Get Started for Free
2 cases
-
British Columbia (Director of Civil Forfeiture) v. Angel Acres Recreation and Festival Property Ltd.
...for any purpose other than making full answer and defence in the proceeding. [1052] More recently, in Dudley v. British Columbia, 2016 BCCA 328, Fitch J.A. wrote at para. 111: This does not mean that the fruits of the investigation, once disclosed, are communal property that may be dissemin......
-
United States v. Meng
...by protecting the information, on one hand, or disclosing relevant evidence in the litigation, on the other: Dudley v. British Columbia, 2016 BCCA 328 at para. Waiver of Privilege [35] The protection of any of the privileges discussed above may be lost if the holder of the privilege is foun......
4 books & journal articles
-
Table of cases
...155 Ducharme , R v , 2004 MBCA 29 ...................................................456 Dudley Estate v British Columbia , 2016 BCCA 328 ..................... 508, 510, 511, 512 Dueck , R v , 2011 SKCA 45 ...................................................... 294 Duff , R v , 1994 CanLII 6......
-
Privileges, Protections, and Immunities
...privilege. 138 Ibid at para 52. Gascon J’s reasoning echoes that of the British Columbia Court of Appeal in Dudley v British Columbia , 2016 BCCA 328 at para 84: “To give effect to the interests the privilege is designed to serve, it must, once established, operate as against any person see......
-
Table of cases
...20 Drumonde v Moniz (1997), 105 OAC 295.......................................................... 252 Dudley v British Columbia, 2016 BCCA 328 ..................................................... 322 Dulong v Merrill Lynch Canada Inc (2006), 80 OR (3d) 378 (SCJ) .................. 252 THE ......
-
Privilege
...“substantial purpose” of litigation was not sufficient. 172 Lizotte , ibid at paras 34, 36, 37. 173 Dudley Estate v British Columbia , 2016 BCCA 328 at paras 37, 107. 174 Lizotte , supra note 6 at para 20. 175 Blank , supra note 54 at paras 28, 32. 176 Lizotte , supra note 6 at para 64. Cop......