Eastwalsh Homes Ltd. v. Anatal Developments Ltd., (1993) 62 O.A.C. 20 (CA)
Judge | McKinlay, Griffiths and Doherty, JJ.A. |
Court | Court of Appeal (Ontario) |
Case Date | March 17, 1993 |
Jurisdiction | Ontario |
Citations | (1993), 62 O.A.C. 20 (CA);1993 CanLII 3431 (ON CA);12 OR (3d) 675;100 DLR (4th) 469;[1993] CarswellOnt 587;[1993] OJ No 676 (QL);30 RPR (2d) 276;62 OAC 20 |
Eastwalsh Homes Ltd. v. Anatal Dev. (1993), 62 O.A.C. 20 (CA)
MLB headnote and full text
Eastwalsh Homes Ltd. (respondent/appellant on cross-appeal) v. Anatal Developments Limited (appellant/defendant on cross-appeal)
(No. C10039)
Indexed As: Eastwalsh Homes Ltd. v. Anatal Developments Ltd.
Ontario Court of Appeal
McKinlay, Griffiths and Doherty, JJ.A.
March 17, 1993.
Summary:
Eastwalsh agreed to buy 147 unapproved building lots from Anatal. Anatal agreed to use its best efforts to obtain planning approval. Planning approval was not obtained by the closing date (June 30, 1987) and, consequently, the agreement by its terms was terminated. Eastwalsh sued Anatal for, inter alia, damages for failure by Anatal to use its best efforts to obtain planning approval.
The trial judge awarded Eastwalsh damages of $2,020,780 - see 72 O.R.(2d) 661. Anatal appealed.
The Ontario Court of Appeal allowed the appeal by reducing the damage award to nominal damages only of $1,000. The court affirmed a breach by Anatal but held that Eastwalsh failed to prove that there was a reasonable probability that planning approval could have been obtained within the time specified in the contract.
Contracts - Topic 6535
Illegal contracts - Violations of statute law, land planning prohibitions - Eastwalsh sued Anatal for damages for breach of an agreement for the sale of 147 unapproved building lots - Anatal alleged that the agreement was invalid because it was contrary to s. 51(1) of the Planning Act, S.O. 1983, c. 1 - The Ontario Court of Appeal affirmed that the agreement was not a nullity - See paragraphs 18 and 26.
Damages - Topic 206
Entitlement - Chance, loss of, requirement of proof of reasonable probability of success - Eastwalsh agreed to buy 147 unapproved building lots from Anatal - Anatal agreed to use its best efforts to obtain planning approval - Planning approval was not obtained within the time specified in the contract and Eastwalsh sued Anatal for damages for failure to use its best efforts to obtain approval - Anatal was found to be in breach of the contract but the Ontario Court of Appeal awarded Eastwalsh nominal damages only because Eastwalsh failed to prove that there was a reasonable probability that planning approval could have been obtained within the time specified in the contract - See paragraph 58.
Damages - Topic 1037
Mitigation - In contract - Effect of failure to mitigate - Eastwalsh sued Anatal for damages for breach of a contract for the sale of 147 building lots - The Ontario Court of Appeal affirmed that Anatal was in breach of the contract - Eastwalsh's claim for damages for loss of profits was dismissed because Eastwalsh made no efforts to mitigate its loss - See paragraph 27.
Cases Noticed:
Chaplin v. Hicks, [1911] 2 K.B. 786; 27 T.L.R. 458 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 35].
Tex-Mall Properties Ltd. v. Multi-Malls Inc. et al. (1980), 28 O.R.(2d) 6; 12 R.P.R. 77; 9 B.L.R. 240; 108 D.L.R.(3d) 399 (H.C.), affd. 37 O.R.(2d) 133; 128 D.L.R.(3d) 192 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 35].
Webb & Knapp (Canada) Ltd. et al. v. Edmonton (City), [1970] S.C.R. 588; 11 D.L.R.(3d) 544; 72 W.W.R. 500; 63 C.P.R. 21, refd to. [para. 40].
Kinkel v. Hyman, [1939] S.C.R. 364, refd to. [para. 41].
Carson v. Willitts, [1930] 4 D.L.R. 977; 65 O.L.R. 456 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 42].
Statutes Noticed:
Planning Act, S.O. 1983, c. 1, sect. 51(1) [paras. 18 and 26].
Counsel:
Joyce Harris and Donna E. Campbell, for the appellant;
Robert Clayton and Randy Pepper, for the respondent.
This appeal was heard on November 17 and 18, 1992, before McKinlay, Griffiths and Doherty, JJ.A., of the Ontario Court of Appeal. The decision of the court was delivered by Griffiths, J.A., and released on March 17, 1993.
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Lindahl Estate et al. v. Olsen et al., (2004) 360 A.R. 310 (QB)
...315; 47 O.R.(3d) 15; 2000 CarswellOnt 89 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 36, footnote 18]. Eastwalsh Homes Ltd. v. Anatal Developments Ltd. (1993), 62 O.A.C. 20; 30 R.P.R.(2d) 276; 100 D.L.R.(4th) 469; 12 O.R.(3d) 675; 1993 CarswwellOnt 587 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 36, footnote 19]. Norberg v. Wynri......
-
G.F. v. Reardon, (2005) 194 O.A.C. 201 (CA)
...Assurance plc et al., [1995] 2 A.C. 296; 174 N.R. 164 (H.L.), refd to. [para. 73]. Eastwalsh Homes Ltd. v. Anatal Developments Ltd. (1993), 62 O.A.C. 20; 12 O.R.(3d) 675 (C.A.), leave to appeal refused (1993), 162 N.R. 399; 67 O.A.C. 79; 15 O.R.(3d) xvi (S.C.C.), refd to. [para. Multi-Malls......
-
Spina v. Shoppers Drug Mart Inc.,
...Contracting Co. v. International Nickel Co. of Canada, [1967] S.C.R. 267. [44] Eastwalsh Homes Ltd. v. Anatal Developments Ltd. (1993), 12 O.R. (3d) 675 (C.A.), leave to appeal to the S.C.C. refused (1993), 15 O.R. (3d) xvi; Houweling Nurseries Ltd. v. Fisons Western Corp. (1988), 49 D.L.R.......
-
Table of cases
...(BCCA) ............................................................................ 328 Eastwalsh Homes Ltd v Anatal Developments Ltd (1993), 12 OR (3d) 675, 100 DLR (4th) 469, 30 RPR (2d) 276 (CA), leave to appeal to SCC refused, [1993] 3 SCR vi, 15 OR (3d) xvi, [1993] SCCA No 225 ..............
-
Spina v. Shoppers Drug Mart Inc.,
...Contracting Co. v. International Nickel Co. of Canada, [1967] S.C.R. 267. [44] Eastwalsh Homes Ltd. v. Anatal Developments Ltd. (1993), 12 O.R. (3d) 675 (C.A.), leave to appeal to the S.C.C. refused (1993), 15 O.R. (3d) xvi; Houweling Nurseries Ltd. v. Fisons Western Corp. (1988), 49 D.L.R.......
-
Lindahl Estate et al. v. Olsen et al., (2004) 360 A.R. 310 (QB)
...315; 47 O.R.(3d) 15; 2000 CarswellOnt 89 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 36, footnote 18]. Eastwalsh Homes Ltd. v. Anatal Developments Ltd. (1993), 62 O.A.C. 20; 30 R.P.R.(2d) 276; 100 D.L.R.(4th) 469; 12 O.R.(3d) 675; 1993 CarswwellOnt 587 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 36, footnote 19]. Norberg v. Wynri......
-
G.F. v. Reardon, (2005) 194 O.A.C. 201 (CA)
...Assurance plc et al., [1995] 2 A.C. 296; 174 N.R. 164 (H.L.), refd to. [para. 73]. Eastwalsh Homes Ltd. v. Anatal Developments Ltd. (1993), 62 O.A.C. 20; 12 O.R.(3d) 675 (C.A.), leave to appeal refused (1993), 162 N.R. 399; 67 O.A.C. 79; 15 O.R.(3d) xvi (S.C.C.), refd to. [para. Multi-Malls......
-
Costello and Dickhoff v. Calgary (City), (1995) 163 A.R. 241 (QB)
...- Trespass to land - Damages - [See eighth Damages - Topic 4212 ]. Cases Noticed: Eastwalsh Homes Ltd. v. Anatal Developments Ltd. (1993), 62 O.A.C. 20; 100 D.L.R.(4th) 469 (C.A.), refd to. [para. Goldie v. Oswald (1814), E.R. 957 (H.L.), refd to. [para. 21]. Maunsell v. Lethbridge Northern......
-
Table of cases
...(BCCA) ............................................................................ 328 Eastwalsh Homes Ltd v Anatal Developments Ltd (1993), 12 OR (3d) 675, 100 DLR (4th) 469, 30 RPR (2d) 276 (CA), leave to appeal to SCC refused, [1993] 3 SCR vi, 15 OR (3d) xvi, [1993] SCCA No 225 ..............
-
Damages
...would be able to establish a 75 percent likelihood of substantial loss and 105 Eastwalsh Homes Ltd v Anatal Developments Ltd (1993), 100 DLR (4th) 469 at 486 (Ont CA). 106 Ibid at 488. 107 Above note 68, for a discussion of which, see Section D, above in this chapter. In McRae itself, the m......
-
Table of Cases
...Eastwalsh Homes Ltd. v. Anatal Developments Ltd. (1990), 72 O.R. (2d) 661, 68 D.L.R. (4th) 246, 11 R.P.R. (2d) 107 (H.C.J.), rev’d (1993), 12 O.R. (3d) 675, 100 D.L.R. (4th) 469, 62 O.A.C. 20 (C.A.), leave to appeal to S.C.C. refused (1993), 15 O.R. (3d) xvi (note), 104 D.L.R. (4th) vii (no......
-
Certainty and Causation
...in the plaintiff’s favour. 39 Ibid at 412. 40 Kinkel v Hyman , [1939] SCR 364; Eastwalsh Homes Ltd v Anatal Developments Ltd (1993), 12 OR (3d) 675 (CA), leave to appeal to SCC refused, [1993] SCCA No 225 [ Eastwalsh Homes ]. See also Sacks , above note 29; JDM Capital , above note 29. 41 F......