Eau Claire Market Inc. v. Calgary, [2015] A.R. Uned. 182
| Judge | Millar, J. |
| Court | Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada) |
| Case Date | February 25, 2015 |
| Jurisdiction | Alberta |
| Citations | [2015] A.R. Uned. 182;[2015] A.R. Uned. 182 (QB);2015 ABQB 131 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
4 practice notes
-
Metropolitan Conference Centre Inc v Calgary (City), 2018 ABQB 983
...the evidence of the applicant. However, the applicant maintains the ultimate persuasive burden: Eau Claire Market Inc v Calgary (City), 2015 ABQB 131 at para [71] In BTC Properties, Romaine J summarized the law relating to the burden of proof as follows, at para 161: The onus on the parties......
-
Canapen (Phipps-Mckinnon) Ltd v Edmonton (City), 2017 ABQB 502
...the issue of breach of procedural fairness or the rules of natural justice is a question of law: Eau Claire Market Inc v Calgary (City), 2015 ABQB 131 at para 10, 27 Alta LR (6th) 410; Edmonton ECARB, 2012 at para 11(c).[74] I agree that, given its jurisprudential value, an assessor’s failu......
-
797175 Alberta Ltd. v. Calgary (City), 2017 ABQB 18
...or as to the “admissibility, relevance and weight of any evidence” (Act, section 464, see also, Eau Claire Market v Calgary (City), 2015 ABQB 131 (CanLII)).[33] The proper role of the Court in reviewing the decisions of the Board is not to determine whether the factual basis for the assessm......
-
TR Canada Inc v Cahill Industrial Limited,
...CanLII 385 (SCC), Iacobucci J at para 35 (CanLII); Concord Pacific Alberta Properties at para 15; Eau Claire Market Inc v Calgary (City), 2015 ABQB 131, Millar J at para 10; Gold Bar at para 11; Canada Safeway at para 18; Edmonton (City) v Alberta (City of Edmonton Composite Assessment Revi......
4 cases
-
Metropolitan Conference Centre Inc v Calgary (City), 2018 ABQB 983
...the evidence of the applicant. However, the applicant maintains the ultimate persuasive burden: Eau Claire Market Inc v Calgary (City), 2015 ABQB 131 at para [71] In BTC Properties, Romaine J summarized the law relating to the burden of proof as follows, at para 161: The onus on the parties......
-
Canapen (Phipps-Mckinnon) Ltd v Edmonton (City), 2017 ABQB 502
...the issue of breach of procedural fairness or the rules of natural justice is a question of law: Eau Claire Market Inc v Calgary (City), 2015 ABQB 131 at para 10, 27 Alta LR (6th) 410; Edmonton ECARB, 2012 at para 11(c).[74] I agree that, given its jurisprudential value, an assessor’s failu......
-
797175 Alberta Ltd. v. Calgary (City), 2017 ABQB 18
...or as to the “admissibility, relevance and weight of any evidence” (Act, section 464, see also, Eau Claire Market v Calgary (City), 2015 ABQB 131 (CanLII)).[33] The proper role of the Court in reviewing the decisions of the Board is not to determine whether the factual basis for the assessm......
-
TR Canada Inc v Cahill Industrial Limited,
...CanLII 385 (SCC), Iacobucci J at para 35 (CanLII); Concord Pacific Alberta Properties at para 15; Eau Claire Market Inc v Calgary (City), 2015 ABQB 131, Millar J at para 10; Gold Bar at para 11; Canada Safeway at para 18; Edmonton (City) v Alberta (City of Edmonton Composite Assessment Revi......