Eccles v. Bourque et al., (1974) 3 N.R. 259 (SCC)
Judge | Beetz and de Grandpré, JJ. |
Court | Supreme Court (Canada) |
Case Date | May 24, 1974 |
Jurisdiction | Canada (Federal) |
Citations | (1974), 3 N.R. 259 (SCC);[1975] 1 WWR 609;3 NR 259;[1974] CarswellBC 414;AZ-75111114;[1974] ACS no 123;1974 CanLII 191 (SCC);[1974] SCJ No 123 (QL);[1975] 2 SCR 739;19 CCC (2d) 129;50 DLR (3d) 753 |
Eccles v. Bourque (1974), 3 N.R. 259 (SCC)
MLB headnote and full text
Eccles v. Bourque et al.
Indexed As: Eccles v. Bourque et al.
Supreme Court of Canada
Laskin, C.J.C., Martland, Judson,
Ritchie, Spence, Pigeon, Dickson,
Beetz and de Grandpré, JJ.
October 11, 1974.
Summary:
This case arose out of a claim for damages for trespass against the defendant police officers. The defendants entered the plaintiff's apartment in search of a fugitive for whom there were outstanding warrants for arrest. The police officers stated that they were "Vancouver City Police". The plaintiff asked the policemen "what do you want?". The police replied that they had reason to believe that a wanted man had just entered the plaintiff's apartment. Without the consent of the plaintiff the police searched the apartment. The trial judge allowed the plaintiff's action and awarded the plaintiff $300.00 damages for trespass.
On appeal to the British Columbia Court of Appeal the appeal was allowed and the judgment of the trial court was set aside - see 41 D.L.R.(3d) 392.
On appeal to the Supreme Court of Canada the appeal was dismissed and the judgment of the British Columbia Court of Appeal was affirmed. The Supreme Court of Canada stated that a police officer may enter a dwelling house without the consent of the occupant if the police officer has reasonable and probable grounds to believe that a fugitive is in the house and proper announcement is made prior to the entry - see paragraphs 6 to 8.
Torts - Topic 3005
Trespass - Trespass to a dwelling house - The Supreme Court of Canada stated that a man's house "is to him as his castle and fortress, as well as his defence against injury and violence, as for his repose" - See paragraph 3.
Torts - Topic 3017
Trespass to a dwelling house by police officers - Criminal process - The defendant police officers forcibly entered and searched the plaintiff's house without a warrant - The police were searching for a fugitive - The Supreme Court of Canada dismissed the plaintiff's action for damages for trespass - The Supreme Court of Canada stated that a police officer may enter a house without the consent of the occupant if the police officer has reasonable and probably grounds to believe that a fugitive is in the house and proper announcement is made prior to entry - See paragraph 6 - The Supreme Court of Canada held that the defendant police officers acted upon reasonable and probable grounds and gave the plaintiff proper notice before forcing entry - See paragraph 8.
Cases Noticed:
Semayne's case, 5 Coke 91 a, folld. [para. 3].
Johnson v. Leigh (1815), 6 Taunt. 246, folld. [para. 7].
Morrish v. Murrey (1844), 13 M & W 52; 153 E.R. 22, folld. [para. 7].
Southam v. Smout, [1964] 1 Q.B. 308, folld. [para. 7].
Mathews v. Dwan, [1949] N.Z.L.R. 1035, refd to. [para. 7].
Davis v. Lisle, [1936] 2 K.B. 434, dist. [para. 7].
Thomas v. Sawkins, [1935] 2 K.B. 249, dist. [para. 7].
Statutes Noticed:
Criminal Code of Canada, R.S.C. 1970, c. C-34, sect. 25 [para. 3]; sect. 450(1)(a).
Counsel:
W.A.M. Stewart, for the appellant;
Allan McEachern, for the respondents.
This appeal was heard by the Supreme Court of Canada on May 24, 1974. Judgment was delivered by the Supreme Court of Canada on October 11, 1974 and the following opinions were filed:
MARTLAND, J. - see paragraph 1.
DICKSON, J. - see paragraphs 2 to 9.
RITCHIE, PIGEON, BEETZ and de GRANDPRE, JJ., concurred with MARTLAND, J.
LASKIN, C.J.C., JUDSON and SPENCE, JJ., concurred with DICKSON, J.
To continue reading
Request your trial-
R. v. Asante-Mensah (D.), (1996) 3 O.T.C. 240 (GD)
...142, refd to. [para. 165]. R. v. Roberge, [1983] 1 S.C.R. 312; 46 N.R. 573; 4 C.C.C.(3d) 304, refd to. [para. 165]. Eccles v. Bourque, [1975] 2 S.C.R. 739; 3 N.R. 259, refd to. [para. Williams v. Laing (1923), 55 O.L.R. 26 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 165]. R. v. Huff (1979), 17 A.R. 499; 50 C.C......
-
R. v. Silveira (A.), (1995) 81 O.A.C. 161 (SCC)
...to. [para. 50]. R. v. Colet, [1981] 1 S.C.R. 2 ; 35 N.R. 227 ; 57 C.C.C.(2d) 105 , refd to. [para. 54]. Eccles v. Bourque et al., [1975] 2 S.C.R. 739; 3 N.R. 259 , refd to. [para. 55]. R. v. Landry, [1986] 1 S.C.R. 145 ; 65 N.R. 161 ; 14 O.A.C. 241 , refd to. [para. 55]. R. v. Macooh......
-
R. v. Simpson (R.), (1993) 60 O.A.C. 327 (CA)
...refd to. [para. 35]. R. v. Biron, [1976] 2 S.C.R. 56; 4 N.R. 45; 23 C.C.C.(2d) 513, refd to. [para. 35]. Eccles v. Bourque et al., [1975] 2 S.C.R. 739; 3 N.R. 259; 19 C.C.C.(2d) 129, refd to. [para. 35]. R. v. Moore, [1979] 1 S.C.R. 195; 24 N.R. 181; 43 C.C.C.(2d) 83, refd to. [para. 35]. R......
-
R. v. Feeney (M.), (1997) 91 B.C.A.C. 1 (SCC)
...v. Langlois and Bédard, [1990] 1 S.C.R. 158 ; 105 N.R. 241 ; 30 Q.A.C. 241 , refd to. [para. 20]. Eccles v. Bourque et al., [1975] 2 S.C.R. 739; 3 N.R. 259 , refd to. [para. 21]. R. v. Landry, [1986] 1 S.C.R. 145 ; 65 N.R. 161 ; 14 O.A.C. 241 , refd to. [para. 21]. R. v. Storrey, [1......
-
Tymkin v. Ewatski et al., 2014 MBCA 4
...1, refd to. [para. 67]. R. v. Landry, [1986] 1 S.C.R. 145; 65 N.R. 161; 14 O.A.C. 241, refd to. [para. 68]. Eccles v. Bourque et al., [1975] 2 S.C.R. 739; 3 N.R. 259, refd to. [para. R. v. Van Wyk (H.W.) (1999), 104 O.T.C. 161 (Sup. Ct.), leave to appeal denied [2002] O.J. No. 3144 (C.A.), ......
-
R. v. Stairs, 2022 SCC 11
...1 S.C.R. 518 ; R. v. Caslake, [1998] 1 S.C.R. 51 ; referred to: Cloutier v. Langlois, [1990] 1 S.C.R. 158 ; Eccles v. Bourque, [1975] 2 S.C.R. 739; Semayne’s Case (1604), 5 Co. Rep. 91a , 77 E.R. 194 ; R. v. Tessling, 2004 SCC 67 , [2004] 3 S.C.R. 432 ; R. v. Silveira, [1995] 2 S.C.R......
-
R. v. Liu (P.T.) et al., [2011] B.C.T.C. Uned. 1266
...4. Sanctity of the home [98] The basic principle of sanctity of the home was discussed in Eccles v. Borque , (1974) 2 SCR 739, 19 CCC (2d) 129; Genest ; R. v. Colet [1981] 1 SCR 2, 57 CCC (2d) 105; R. v. Landry [1986] 1 SCR 145, 26 DLR (4th) 368; R. v. Gimson (1990), 37 OAC 243, 54 CCC (3d)......
-
R. v. R.E.B., (1997) 201 A.R. 321 (PC)
...137]. R. v. Landry, [1986] 1 S.C.R. 145; 65 N.R. 161; 14 O.A.C. 241; 25 C.C.C.(3d) 1, refd to. [para. 142]. Eccles v. Bourque et al., [1975] 2 S.C.R. 739; 3 N.R. 259; 19 C.C.C.(2d) 129; 50 D.L.R.(3d) 753; 27 C.R.N.S. 325; [1975] 1 W.W.R. 209, refd to. [para. R. v. Colet, [1981] 1 S.C.R. 2; ......
-
Table of cases
...585 Dupuis c R, 2016 QCCA 1930 ............................................................................444 Eccles v Bourque (1974), [1975] 2 SCR 739, 19 CCC (2d) 129, [1974] SCJ No 123............................................................................. 16, 17, 207 Edmonton Poli......
-
Nature of the Interaction Between Police and Individuals
...See R v Lyons , [1984] 2 SCR 633 [ Lyons ]; Reference re: Judicature Act (Alberta) , s. 27(1) , [1984] 2 SCR 697. 16 Eccles v Bourque , [1975] 2 SCR 739 [ Eccles ]. 17 R v Landry , [1986] 1 SCR 145 [ Landry ]. 18 R v Macooh , [1993] 2 SCR 802 [ Macooh ]. Nature of the Interaction Between Po......
-
Unchecked power: the constitutional regulation of arrest reconsidered.
...grounds to believe that an individual had committed an indictable offence and could be found inside. See Eccles v. Bourque (1974), [1975] 2 S.C.R. 739 at 746-47, 50 D.L.R. (3d) 753; Landry, supra note 80 at (239) Feeney, supra note 50 at 47-50. The Court expressly refrained from addressing ......
-
Sources of Criminal Procedure
...86. 46 R v Fearon , 2014 SCC 77. See the further discussion of search incident to arrest in Chapter 4. 47 R v Saeed , 2016 SCC 24. 48 [1975] 2 SCR 739. 49 [1986] 1 SCR 145 at para 19 [ Landry ]. Sources of Criminal Procedure 17 the civil context of Eccles v Bourque . 50 Subsequently in R v ......