Edmonton Nurseries Ltd. v. Edmonton (City) et al., (1976) 2 A.R. 14 (CA)
| Judge | Moir, J.A. |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Alberta) |
| Case Date | October 19, 1976 |
| Citations | (1976), 2 A.R. 14 (CA) |
Edmonton Nurseries Ltd. v. Edmonton (1976), 2 A.R. 14 (CA)
MLB headnote and full text
Edmonton Nurseries Ltd. v. City of Edmonton et al.
Indexed As: Edmonton Nurseries Ltd. v. Edmonton (City) et al.
Alberta Supreme Court
Appellate Division
Moir, J.A.
October 19, 1976.
Summary:
This headnote contains no summary.
Practice - Topic 8871
Appeals - Leave to appeal - Application for leave to appeal - Form of application - Planning Act, R.S.A. 1970, c. 276, ss. 143, 146(2) - The applicant wished to appeal to the Appellate Division from a decision of the Provincial Planning Board - The applicant filed a notice of appeal within the time limited by s. 146(2) of the Planning Act, but did not file a notice of motion for leave to appeal, which the respondent alleged was a fatal error - The Alberta Court of Appeal held that, since some members of the Appellate Division accepted the notice of appeal as a notice of application for leave to appeal, the error of the applicant should be treated as one of form only - The Appellate Division held that the applicant complied with s. 146(2) of the Planning Act and granted leave to appeal.
Statutes Noticed:
Planning Act, R.S.A. 1970, c. 276, sect. 143 [para. 2]; sect. 146(2) [para. 5].
Rules of Court (Alta.), rule 558, rule 559, rule 560, rule 561 [para. 6].
Counsel:
N.A. Maydonik, for Provincial Planning Board;
F.R. Haldane, for City of Edmonton;
E.L. Bunnell, for Edmonton Nurseries Ltd.
This case was heard at Edmonton, Alberta, before MOIR, J.A., of the Alberta Supreme Court, Appellate Division.
On October 19, 1976, MOIR, J.A., delivered the following judgment:
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Lewis v. Pincher Creek No. 9 (Municipal District), 2005 ABQB 201
...So long as the Rules of Court are not directly contrary to the statute, they may and should be used. See Edmonton Nurseries v. Edmonton (1976), 2 A.R. 14; 1 Alta. L.R. (2d) 226, and Laux, Planning Law & Practice in Alberta, at p. 474, note 18 (2nd Ed. 1990)." [19] Rule 410 governs the c......
-
R. v. Lucier (R.C.), (1996) 187 A.R. 228 (CA)
...[para. 9]. R. v. Mankow (1959), 123 C.C.C. 74 (Alta. C.A.), refd to. [para. 11]. Edmonton Nurseries Ltd. v. Edmonton (City) et al. (1976), 2 A.R. 14; 1 Alta. L.R.(2d) 226 (C.A.), consd. [para. Statutes Noticed: Criminal Code, R.S.C. 1985, c. C-46, sect. 676(1)(d) [para. 3]; sect. 678(1), se......
-
Houg Alberta Ltd. v. 417034 Alberta Ltd., (1991) 117 A.R. 196 (CA)
...as found in s. 152(2) of the Planning Act, R.S.A. 1980, c. P-9 (see paragraph 30). Cases Noticed: Edmonton Nurseries v. Edmonton (1976), 2 A.R. 14; 1 Alta. L.R.(2d) 226, refd to. [para. Fraser v. Calgary (City) (1978), 10 A.R. 456; 6 Alta. L.R.(2d) 210 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 29]. Bowen v. ......
-
Frost v. Suffesick and Kudryk, (1998) 212 A.R. 148 (CA)
...v. Valois, [1990] 2 S.C.R. 1259; 119 N.R. 64; 36 Q.A.C. 280, dist. [para. 11]. Edmonton Nurseries Ltd. v. Edmonton (City) et al. (1976), 2 A.R. 14 (C.A.), dist. [para. Statutes Noticed: Police Act, S.A. 1988, c. P-12.01, sect. 18 [para. 9]. Counsel: The appellant appeared on her own behalf;......
-
Lewis v. Pincher Creek No. 9 (Municipal District), 2005 ABQB 201
...So long as the Rules of Court are not directly contrary to the statute, they may and should be used. See Edmonton Nurseries v. Edmonton (1976), 2 A.R. 14; 1 Alta. L.R. (2d) 226, and Laux, Planning Law & Practice in Alberta, at p. 474, note 18 (2nd Ed. 1990)." [19] Rule 410 governs the c......
-
R. v. Lucier (R.C.), (1996) 187 A.R. 228 (CA)
...[para. 9]. R. v. Mankow (1959), 123 C.C.C. 74 (Alta. C.A.), refd to. [para. 11]. Edmonton Nurseries Ltd. v. Edmonton (City) et al. (1976), 2 A.R. 14; 1 Alta. L.R.(2d) 226 (C.A.), consd. [para. Statutes Noticed: Criminal Code, R.S.C. 1985, c. C-46, sect. 676(1)(d) [para. 3]; sect. 678(1), se......
-
Houg Alberta Ltd. v. 417034 Alberta Ltd., (1991) 117 A.R. 196 (CA)
...as found in s. 152(2) of the Planning Act, R.S.A. 1980, c. P-9 (see paragraph 30). Cases Noticed: Edmonton Nurseries v. Edmonton (1976), 2 A.R. 14; 1 Alta. L.R.(2d) 226, refd to. [para. Fraser v. Calgary (City) (1978), 10 A.R. 456; 6 Alta. L.R.(2d) 210 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 29]. Bowen v. ......
-
Frost v. Suffesick and Kudryk, (1998) 212 A.R. 148 (CA)
...v. Valois, [1990] 2 S.C.R. 1259; 119 N.R. 64; 36 Q.A.C. 280, dist. [para. 11]. Edmonton Nurseries Ltd. v. Edmonton (City) et al. (1976), 2 A.R. 14 (C.A.), dist. [para. Statutes Noticed: Police Act, S.A. 1988, c. P-12.01, sect. 18 [para. 9]. Counsel: The appellant appeared on her own behalf;......