Electek Power Services Inc. v. Greenfield Energy Centre Limited Partnership,

JurisdictionOntario
JudgePERELL
Citation2022 ONSC 894
CourtSuperior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
Docket NumberCV-20-637621-0000
Date08 February 2022
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
8 practice notes
  • Court Of Appeal Summaries (May 8, 2023 ' May 12, 2023)
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • 24. Mai 2023
    ...Moly Corp., 2014 SCC 53, Haas v. Gunasekaram, 2016 ONCA 744, Electek Power Services Inc. v. Greenfield Energy Centre Limited Partnership, 2022 ONSC 894, Heyman v. Darwins Ltd., [1942] A.C. 356 (H.L.), MDG Kingston Inc. v. MDG Computers Canada Inc., 2008 ONCA 656, Fairfield v. Low (1990), 19......
  • 2329716 Alberta Ltd v Jagroop Randhawa,
    • Canada
    • Court of King's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • 16. Mai 2023
    ...v Bushert, 2004 CanLII 35081 (ONCA) at paras 19-24; and Electek Power Services Inc v Greenfield Energy Centre Limited Partnership, 2022 ONSC 894 (paras 25 All to say: the various relief sought by the vendors plainly falls inside the scope of the agreement's arbitration provision. B. No......
  • Dow Chemical Canada ULC v NOVA Chemicals Corporation,
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • 14. April 2023
    ...A more recent case, Electek Power Services Inc v Greenfield Energy Centre Limited Partnership, 2022 ONSC 894, did not consider the scope of “has not participated in s. 48” but, as in Eyelet, held that the test for determining whether to enjoin an arbitration under s. 48(2) is ......
  • Dow Chemical Canada ULC v NOVA Chemicals Corporation,
    • Canada
    • Court of King's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • 14. April 2023
    ...the Court”: Eyelet at para 13. 78 A more recent case, Electek Power Services Inc v Greenfield Energy Centre Limited Partnership, 2022 ONSC 894, did not consider the scope of “has not participated in s. 48” but, as in Eyelet, held that the test for determining whether to......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
6 cases
  • 2329716 Alberta Ltd v Jagroop Randhawa,
    • Canada
    • Court of King's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • 16. Mai 2023
    ...v Bushert, 2004 CanLII 35081 (ONCA) at paras 19-24; and Electek Power Services Inc v Greenfield Energy Centre Limited Partnership, 2022 ONSC 894 (paras 25 All to say: the various relief sought by the vendors plainly falls inside the scope of the agreement's arbitration provision. B. No......
  • Dow Chemical Canada ULC v NOVA Chemicals Corporation,
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • 14. April 2023
    ...A more recent case, Electek Power Services Inc v Greenfield Energy Centre Limited Partnership, 2022 ONSC 894, did not consider the scope of “has not participated in s. 48” but, as in Eyelet, held that the test for determining whether to enjoin an arbitration under s. 48(2) is ......
  • Dow Chemical Canada ULC v NOVA Chemicals Corporation,
    • Canada
    • Court of King's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • 14. April 2023
    ...the Court”: Eyelet at para 13. 78 A more recent case, Electek Power Services Inc v Greenfield Energy Centre Limited Partnership, 2022 ONSC 894, did not consider the scope of “has not participated in s. 48” but, as in Eyelet, held that the test for determining whether to......
  • 2023 ABKB 215,
    • Canada
    • 1. Januar 2023
    ...the Court”: Eyelet at para 13. 78 A more recent case, Electek Power Services Inc v Greenfield Energy Centre Limited Partnership, 2022 ONSC 894, did not consider the scope of “has not participated in s. 48” but, as in Eyelet, held that the test for determining whether to......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 firm's commentaries

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT