Electek Power Services Inc. v. Greenfield Energy Centre Limited Partnership, 2022 ONSC 894

JurisdictionOntario
JudgePERELL
Citation2022 ONSC 894
Docket NumberCV-20-637621-0000
CourtSuperior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
Date08 February 2022
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
8 practice notes
  • Court Of Appeal Summaries (May 8, 2023 ' May 12, 2023)
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • May 24, 2023
    ...Moly Corp., 2014 SCC 53, Haas v. Gunasekaram, 2016 ONCA 744, Electek Power Services Inc. v. Greenfield Energy Centre Limited Partnership, 2022 ONSC 894, Heyman v. Darwins Ltd., [1942] A.C. 356 (H.L.), MDG Kingston Inc. v. MDG Computers Canada Inc., 2008 ONCA 656, Fairfield v. Low (1990), 19......
  • 2329716 Alberta Ltd v Jagroop Randhawa,
    • Canada
    • Court of King's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • May 16, 2023
    ...v Bushert, 2004 CanLII 35081 (ONCA) at paras 19-24; and Electek Power Services Inc v Greenfield Energy Centre Limited Partnership, 2022 ONSC 894 (paras 25 All to say: the various relief sought by the vendors plainly falls inside the scope of the agreement's arbitration provision. B. No......
  • Dow Chemical Canada ULC v NOVA Chemicals Corporation,
    • Canada
    • Court of King's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • April 14, 2023
    ...A more recent case, Electek Power Services Inc v Greenfield Energy Centre Limited Partnership, 2022 ONSC 894, did not consider the scope of “has not participated in s. 48” but, as in Eyelet, held that the test for determining whether to enjoin an arbitration under s. 48(2) is ......
  • 2023 ABKB 215,
    • Canada
    • January 1, 2023
    ...the Court”: Eyelet at para 13. 78 A more recent case, Electek Power Services Inc v Greenfield Energy Centre Limited Partnership, 2022 ONSC 894, did not consider the scope of “has not participated in s. 48” but, as in Eyelet, held that the test for determining whether to......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
6 cases
  • 2329716 Alberta Ltd v Jagroop Randhawa,
    • Canada
    • Court of King's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • May 16, 2023
    ...v Bushert, 2004 CanLII 35081 (ONCA) at paras 19-24; and Electek Power Services Inc v Greenfield Energy Centre Limited Partnership, 2022 ONSC 894 (paras 25 All to say: the various relief sought by the vendors plainly falls inside the scope of the agreement's arbitration provision. B. No......
  • Dow Chemical Canada ULC v NOVA Chemicals Corporation,
    • Canada
    • Court of King's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • April 14, 2023
    ...A more recent case, Electek Power Services Inc v Greenfield Energy Centre Limited Partnership, 2022 ONSC 894, did not consider the scope of “has not participated in s. 48” but, as in Eyelet, held that the test for determining whether to enjoin an arbitration under s. 48(2) is ......
  • 2023 ABKB 215,
    • Canada
    • January 1, 2023
    ...the Court”: Eyelet at para 13. 78 A more recent case, Electek Power Services Inc v Greenfield Energy Centre Limited Partnership, 2022 ONSC 894, did not consider the scope of “has not participated in s. 48” but, as in Eyelet, held that the test for determining whether to......
  • Dow Chemical Canada ULC v NOVA Chemicals Corporation,
    • Canada
    • Court of King's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • April 14, 2023
    ...the Court”: Eyelet at para 13. 78 A more recent case, Electek Power Services Inc v Greenfield Energy Centre Limited Partnership, 2022 ONSC 894, did not consider the scope of “has not participated in s. 48” but, as in Eyelet, held that the test for determining whether to......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
2 firm's commentaries
  • Court Of Appeal Summaries (May 8, 2023 ' May 12, 2023)
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • May 24, 2023
    ...Moly Corp., 2014 SCC 53, Haas v. Gunasekaram, 2016 ONCA 744, Electek Power Services Inc. v. Greenfield Energy Centre Limited Partnership, 2022 ONSC 894, Heyman v. Darwins Ltd., [1942] A.C. 356 (H.L.), MDG Kingston Inc. v. MDG Computers Canada Inc., 2008 ONCA 656, Fairfield v. Low (1990), 19......
  • Why Purchase Orders Alone Are Not Enough: Keep Consistent Or Lose The Benefit Of The Arbitration Clause
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • May 22, 2023
    ...Services Inc v. Greenfield Energy Centre Limited Partnership, 2022 ONSC 894 (EPS) serves as a stark reminder to monitor and review purchase orders even during the course of long-standing commercial relationships. In EPS, the Court determined that an executed purchase order, with terms and c......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT