Electek Power Services Inc. v. Greenfield Energy Centre Limited Partnership

JurisdictionOntario
JudgePERELL
Date08 February 2022
Docket NumberCV-20-637621-0000
Citation2022 ONSC 894
CourtSuperior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
13 practice notes
  • Court Of Appeal Summaries (May 8, 2023 ' May 12, 2023)
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • May 24, 2023
    ...Moly Corp., 2014 SCC 53, Haas v. Gunasekaram, 2016 ONCA 744, Electek Power Services Inc. v. Greenfield Energy Centre Limited Partnership, 2022 ONSC 894, Heyman v. Darwins Ltd., [1942] A.C. 356 (H.L.), MDG Kingston Inc. v. MDG Computers Canada Inc., 2008 ONCA 656, Fairfield v. Low (1990), 19......
  • 2329716 Alberta Ltd v Jagroop Randhawa,
    • Canada
    • Court of King's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • May 16, 2023
    ...v Bushert, 2004 CanLII 35081 (ONCA) at paras 19-24; and Electek Power Services Inc v Greenfield Energy Centre Limited Partnership, 2022 ONSC 894 (paras 25 All to say: the various relief sought by the vendors plainly falls inside the scope of the agreement's arbitration provision. B. No......
  • Dow Chemical Canada ULC v NOVA Chemicals Corporation,
    • Canada
    • Court of King's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • April 14, 2023
    ...A more recent case, Electek Power Services Inc v Greenfield Energy Centre Limited Partnership, 2022 ONSC 894, did not consider the scope of “has not participated in s. 48” but, as in Eyelet, held that the test for determining whether to enjoin an arbitration under s. 48(2) is ......
  • 2023 ABKB 215,
    • Canada
    • January 1, 2023
    ...the Court”: Eyelet at para 13. 78 A more recent case, Electek Power Services Inc v Greenfield Energy Centre Limited Partnership, 2022 ONSC 894, did not consider the scope of “has not participated in s. 48” but, as in Eyelet, held that the test for determining whether to......
  • Get Started for Free
11 cases
  • 2329716 Alberta Ltd v Jagroop Randhawa
    • Canada
    • Court of King's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • May 16, 2023
    ...v Bushert, 2004 CanLII 35081 (ONCA) at paras 19-24; and Electek Power Services Inc v Greenfield Energy Centre Limited Partnership, 2022 ONSC 894 (paras 25 All to say: the various relief sought by the vendors plainly falls inside the scope of the agreement's arbitration provision. B. No......
  • Dow Chemical Canada ULC v NOVA Chemicals Corporation
    • Canada
    • Court of King's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • April 14, 2023
    ...A more recent case, Electek Power Services Inc v Greenfield Energy Centre Limited Partnership, 2022 ONSC 894, did not consider the scope of “has not participated in s. 48” but, as in Eyelet, held that the test for determining whether to enjoin an arbitration under s. 48(2) is ......
  • 2023 ABKB 215
    • Canada
    • January 1, 2023
    ...the Court”: Eyelet at para 13. 78 A more recent case, Electek Power Services Inc v Greenfield Energy Centre Limited Partnership, 2022 ONSC 894, did not consider the scope of “has not participated in s. 48” but, as in Eyelet, held that the test for determining whether to......
  • Dow Chemical Canada ULC v NOVA Chemicals Corporation
    • Canada
    • Court of King's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • April 14, 2023
    ...the Court”: Eyelet at para 13. 78 A more recent case, Electek Power Services Inc v Greenfield Energy Centre Limited Partnership, 2022 ONSC 894, did not consider the scope of “has not participated in s. 48” but, as in Eyelet, held that the test for determining whether to......
  • Get Started for Free
2 firm's commentaries
  • Court Of Appeal Summaries (May 8, 2023 ' May 12, 2023)
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • May 24, 2023
    ...Moly Corp., 2014 SCC 53, Haas v. Gunasekaram, 2016 ONCA 744, Electek Power Services Inc. v. Greenfield Energy Centre Limited Partnership, 2022 ONSC 894, Heyman v. Darwins Ltd., [1942] A.C. 356 (H.L.), MDG Kingston Inc. v. MDG Computers Canada Inc., 2008 ONCA 656, Fairfield v. Low (1990), 19......
  • Why Purchase Orders Alone Are Not Enough: Keep Consistent Or Lose The Benefit Of The Arbitration Clause
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • May 22, 2023
    ...Services Inc v. Greenfield Energy Centre Limited Partnership, 2022 ONSC 894 (EPS) serves as a stark reminder to monitor and review purchase orders even during the course of long-standing commercial relationships. In EPS, the Court determined that an executed purchase order, with terms and c......