Electek Power Services Inc. v. Greenfield Energy Centre Limited Partnership,
| Jurisdiction | Ontario |
| Judge | PERELL |
| Citation | 2022 ONSC 894 |
| Court | Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada) |
| Docket Number | CV-20-637621-0000 |
| Date | 08 February 2022 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
6 practice notes
-
2329716 Alberta Ltd v Jagroop Randhawa,
...v Bushert, 2004 CanLII 35081 (ONCA) at paras 19-24; and Electek Power Services Inc v Greenfield Energy Centre Limited Partnership, 2022 ONSC 894 (paras 25 All to say: the various relief sought by the vendors plainly falls inside the scope of the agreement's arbitration provision. B. No......
-
Dow Chemical Canada ULC v NOVA Chemicals Corporation,
...A more recent case, Electek Power Services Inc v Greenfield Energy Centre Limited Partnership, 2022 ONSC 894, did not consider the scope of “has not participated in s. 48” but, as in Eyelet, held that the test for determining whether to enjoin an arbitration under s. 48(2) is ......
-
Dow Chemical Canada ULC v NOVA Chemicals Corporation,
...the Court”: Eyelet at para 13. 78 A more recent case, Electek Power Services Inc v Greenfield Energy Centre Limited Partnership, 2022 ONSC 894, did not consider the scope of “has not participated in s. 48” but, as in Eyelet, held that the test for determining whether to......
-
2023 ABKB 215,
...the Court”: Eyelet at para 13. 78 A more recent case, Electek Power Services Inc v Greenfield Energy Centre Limited Partnership, 2022 ONSC 894, did not consider the scope of “has not participated in s. 48” but, as in Eyelet, held that the test for determining whether to......
Request a trial to view additional results
6 cases
-
2329716 Alberta Ltd v Jagroop Randhawa,
...v Bushert, 2004 CanLII 35081 (ONCA) at paras 19-24; and Electek Power Services Inc v Greenfield Energy Centre Limited Partnership, 2022 ONSC 894 (paras 25 All to say: the various relief sought by the vendors plainly falls inside the scope of the agreement's arbitration provision. B. No......
-
Dow Chemical Canada ULC v NOVA Chemicals Corporation,
...A more recent case, Electek Power Services Inc v Greenfield Energy Centre Limited Partnership, 2022 ONSC 894, did not consider the scope of “has not participated in s. 48” but, as in Eyelet, held that the test for determining whether to enjoin an arbitration under s. 48(2) is ......
-
2023 ABKB 215,
...the Court”: Eyelet at para 13. 78 A more recent case, Electek Power Services Inc v Greenfield Energy Centre Limited Partnership, 2022 ONSC 894, did not consider the scope of “has not participated in s. 48” but, as in Eyelet, held that the test for determining whether to......
-
Dow Chemical Canada ULC v NOVA Chemicals Corporation,
...the Court”: Eyelet at para 13. 78 A more recent case, Electek Power Services Inc v Greenfield Energy Centre Limited Partnership, 2022 ONSC 894, did not consider the scope of “has not participated in s. 48” but, as in Eyelet, held that the test for determining whether to......
Request a trial to view additional results
1 firm's commentaries
-
Why Purchase Orders Alone Are Not Enough: Keep Consistent Or Lose The Benefit Of The Arbitration Clause
...Services Inc v. Greenfield Energy Centre Limited Partnership, 2022 ONSC 894 (EPS) serves as a stark reminder to monitor and review purchase orders even during the course of long-standing commercial relationships. In EPS, the Court determined that an executed purchase order, with terms and c......