Evans v. Keill, 2018 BCSC 1651

JudgeHonourable Madam Justice Matthews
CourtSupreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
Case DateSeptember 25, 2018
JurisdictionBritish Columbia
Citations2018 BCSC 1651
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
21 practice notes
  • Nadeau v. Toulmin, 2020 BCSC 866
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • 10 Junio 2020
    ...the appropriate quantum of the award. Ms. Nadeau cited Alafianpour-Esfahani v. Jolliffe, 2017 BCSC 701; Beaton; Evans v. Keill, 2018 BCSC 1651; and Lewis v. Wang, 2020 BCSC 16, in support of her submission that the appropriate range for non-pecuniary damages in her case is $100,000 to $120,......
  • McCliggot v. Elliott,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (British Columbia)
    • 16 Septiembre 2022
    ...BCSC 1776; Montgomery v. Williamson, 2015 BCSC 792; Merko v. Plummer, 2016 BCSC 1403; Olson v. Ironside, 2012 BCSC 546; Evans v. Keill, 2018 BCSC 1651; Daleh v. Schroeder, 2019 BCSC 1179. The appellants submit that all of these decisions involved more serious injuries than those suffered by......
  • Han v. Ha, 2020 BCSC 1136
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • 4 Agosto 2020
    ...was compounded by the death of her boyfriend in the significant accident she was involved in. [52] The defendants rely on Evans v. Keill, 2018 BCSC 1651, and Iampietro v. Leung, 2019 BCSC 1750, to support an argument that the appropriate award for general damages should be in the range of $......
  • Bhatti v. Ethier, 2018 BCSC 1779
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • 16 Octubre 2018
    ...is real and substantial: Gao v. Dietrich, 2018 BCCA 372, at para. 39; Gill v. Lai, 2018 BCSC 101, at para. 73; Evans v. Keill, 2018 BCSC 1651, at para. 121. [132] The extent to which treatment the plaintiff refused to undertake would have been effective cannot be established with certainty.......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
21 cases
  • Nadeau v. Toulmin, 2020 BCSC 866
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • 10 Junio 2020
    ...the appropriate quantum of the award. Ms. Nadeau cited Alafianpour-Esfahani v. Jolliffe, 2017 BCSC 701; Beaton; Evans v. Keill, 2018 BCSC 1651; and Lewis v. Wang, 2020 BCSC 16, in support of her submission that the appropriate range for non-pecuniary damages in her case is $100,000 to $120,......
  • McCliggot v. Elliott,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (British Columbia)
    • 16 Septiembre 2022
    ...BCSC 1776; Montgomery v. Williamson, 2015 BCSC 792; Merko v. Plummer, 2016 BCSC 1403; Olson v. Ironside, 2012 BCSC 546; Evans v. Keill, 2018 BCSC 1651; Daleh v. Schroeder, 2019 BCSC 1179. The appellants submit that all of these decisions involved more serious injuries than those suffered by......
  • Han v. Ha, 2020 BCSC 1136
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • 4 Agosto 2020
    ...was compounded by the death of her boyfriend in the significant accident she was involved in. [52] The defendants rely on Evans v. Keill, 2018 BCSC 1651, and Iampietro v. Leung, 2019 BCSC 1750, to support an argument that the appropriate award for general damages should be in the range of $......
  • Bhatti v. Ethier, 2018 BCSC 1779
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • 16 Octubre 2018
    ...is real and substantial: Gao v. Dietrich, 2018 BCCA 372, at para. 39; Gill v. Lai, 2018 BCSC 101, at para. 73; Evans v. Keill, 2018 BCSC 1651, at para. 121. [132] The extent to which treatment the plaintiff refused to undertake would have been effective cannot be established with certainty.......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT