Evans v. Paradigm Capital Inc.,

JurisdictionOntario
JudgeHoy,Feldman,Huscroft
Citation2018 ONCA 952
Docket NumberC62564
CourtCourt of Appeal (Ontario)
Date27 November 2018

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
5 practice notes
  • Lischuk v K-Jay Electric Ltd
    • Canada
    • Court of King's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • September 9, 2025
    ...155, which follows the line of authority from Love v Acuity Investment Management Inc., 2011 ONCA 130 and Evans v Paradigm Capital Inc., 2018 ONCA 952. All three cases address the impact of termination of employment upon either bonuses related in some fashion to shareholdings or shareholder......
  • Devil's In The Detail Or Employment Contracts Redux*: The Twelve Most Common Avoidable Drafting Errors
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • November 8, 2019
    ...paras 44-64. 39 2019 ONCA 512. 40 Mikelsteins v Morrison Herschfield Limited, 2019 ONCA 515 [Mikelsteins]; Evans v Paradigm Capital Inc, 2018 ONCA 952. 41 Mikelsteins, supra note 41 at para 42 Mikelsteins, supra note 41 at paras 23-23. 43 Attributed to Michael J. Fox. 44 Must be careful to ......
  • A Whirlwind Review: Ontario Court Of Appeal Employment Cases 2018 - 2019
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • December 5, 2019
    ...and as an employee: Mikelsteins v. Morrison Herschfield Limited, 2019 ONCA 515 ("Mikelsteins"); Evans v. Paradigm Capital Inc., 2018 ONCA 952 This year, the Court of Appeal had no issues distinguishing between an employee's rights as an employee and an employee's rights as an owner of share......
  • Sudhir Thomas v. Accenture Inc .and Accenture Inc. v. Sudhir Thomas
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • March 23, 2021
    ...The right to such payments ceases when the shareholder ceases to be a shareholder: (Evans v. Paradigm Capital Inc., 2018 ONCA 952).                           &#x......
  • Get Started for Free
2 cases
  • Lischuk v K-Jay Electric Ltd
    • Canada
    • Court of King's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • September 9, 2025
    ...155, which follows the line of authority from Love v Acuity Investment Management Inc., 2011 ONCA 130 and Evans v Paradigm Capital Inc., 2018 ONCA 952. All three cases address the impact of termination of employment upon either bonuses related in some fashion to shareholdings or shareholder......
  • Sudhir Thomas v. Accenture Inc .and Accenture Inc. v. Sudhir Thomas
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • March 23, 2021
    ...The right to such payments ceases when the shareholder ceases to be a shareholder: (Evans v. Paradigm Capital Inc., 2018 ONCA 952).                           &#x......
3 firm's commentaries
  • Devil's In The Detail Or Employment Contracts Redux*: The Twelve Most Common Avoidable Drafting Errors
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • November 8, 2019
    ...paras 44-64. 39 2019 ONCA 512. 40 Mikelsteins v Morrison Herschfield Limited, 2019 ONCA 515 [Mikelsteins]; Evans v Paradigm Capital Inc, 2018 ONCA 952. 41 Mikelsteins, supra note 41 at para 42 Mikelsteins, supra note 41 at paras 23-23. 43 Attributed to Michael J. Fox. 44 Must be careful to ......
  • A Whirlwind Review: Ontario Court Of Appeal Employment Cases 2018 - 2019
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • December 5, 2019
    ...and as an employee: Mikelsteins v. Morrison Herschfield Limited, 2019 ONCA 515 ("Mikelsteins"); Evans v. Paradigm Capital Inc., 2018 ONCA 952 This year, the Court of Appeal had no issues distinguishing between an employee's rights as an employee and an employee's rights as an owner of share......
  • Double Bonus: Court Sides With Employer On Bonus Entitlement, Calculation Appeals
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • December 27, 2018
    ...capital remained at risk in the company for the duration of the reasonable notice period."6 Footnote 1 Evans v. Paradigm Capital Inc., 2018 ONCA 952 2Evans v Paradigm Capital Inc., 2016 ONSC 4286 (CanLII) 3Evans v. Paradigm Capital Inc., 2018 ONCA 952 (CanLII), at para 11. 4Evans v. Paradig......