Ewert v. Höegh Autoliners AS, 2020 BCCA 181

JurisdictionBritish Columbia
JudgeThe Honourable Madam Justice MacKenzie,The Honourable Mr. Justice Fitch,The Honourable Madam Justice Fisher
Citation2020 BCCA 181
Docket NumberCA44148
CourtCourt of Appeal (British Columbia)
Date29 June 2020
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
24 practice notes
  • Table of Cases
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Transnational and Cross-Border Criminal Law. Canadian Perspectives Part VI. Inter-State Cooperation and Enforcement
    • September 12, 2023
    ...États-Unis Mexicains c Boily, 2005 QCCA 599.......................................................... 436 Ewert v Höegh Autoliners AS, 2020 BCCA 181 ..........................................................355 Ezokola v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2013 SCC 40 ..........................
  • Cleeves v. The Warden and Fellows of St. Antony’s College in the University of Oxford,
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • April 14, 2021
    ...recently provided the framework for assessing a jurisdictional challenge based on territorial competence in Ewert v. Höegh Autoliners AS, 2020 BCCA 181 where MacKenzie J.A. [9] To understand how this application proceeded, it is important to set out the framework for assessing territorial c......
  • Canada (Attorney General) v. Scow,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (British Columbia)
    • August 5, 2022
    ...no jurisdiction to entertain the claim is a question of law to which a correctness standard applies: Ewert v. Höegh Autoliners AS, 2020 BCCA 181 at paras. 42–44. I do not understand the plaintiff to contest this latter [78]       A court is not requ......
  • The Long Arm of Canadian Price-Fixing Law? Canadian Jurisdiction Over Foreign Price-Fixing Conspiracies
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Transnational and Cross-Border Criminal Law. Canadian Perspectives Part IV
    • September 12, 2023
    ...their sales into Canada. his might supply the causal connection sought by Perell J. 27 Ibid at para 109. 28 Ewert v Höegh Autoliners AS , 2020 BCCA 181. 29 Ibid at para 76. 30 Ibid at para 77. 31 Pioneer Corp v Godfrey , above note 14. 32 Ibid at para 59. 355 W. Michael G. Osborne 3) Effect......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
22 cases
  • Cleeves v. The Warden and Fellows of St. Antony’s College in the University of Oxford,
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • April 14, 2021
    ...recently provided the framework for assessing a jurisdictional challenge based on territorial competence in Ewert v. Höegh Autoliners AS, 2020 BCCA 181 where MacKenzie J.A. [9] To understand how this application proceeded, it is important to set out the framework for assessing territorial c......
  • Canada (Attorney General) v. Scow,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (British Columbia)
    • August 5, 2022
    ...no jurisdiction to entertain the claim is a question of law to which a correctness standard applies: Ewert v. Höegh Autoliners AS, 2020 BCCA 181 at paras. 42–44. I do not understand the plaintiff to contest this latter [78]       A court is not requ......
  • Stephens v. JUUL Labs Canada, Ltd.,
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • October 14, 2022
    ...Canadian legal system as a whole. The Analytical Framework [49]       In Ewert v. Höegh Autoliners AS, 2020 BCCA 181, at paras 14-17 [Ewert], Justice MacKenzie set out, and refined somewhat, the analytical framework to be followed in cases such as [14] ......
  • Saskatchewan Power Corporation v Mitsubishi Power Canada Ltd.,
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Saskatchewan (Canada)
    • June 17, 2022
    ...even where a defendant does not distribute its goods directly into the Saskatchewan market. In Ewert v Höegh Autoliners AS, 2020 BCCA 181 at para 90, the British Columbia Court of Appeal held this was not a requirement under ss. 10(g) of the British Columbia Court Jurisdiction and Proc......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
2 books & journal articles
  • Table of Cases
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Transnational and Cross-Border Criminal Law. Canadian Perspectives Part VI. Inter-State Cooperation and Enforcement
    • September 12, 2023
    ...États-Unis Mexicains c Boily, 2005 QCCA 599.......................................................... 436 Ewert v Höegh Autoliners AS, 2020 BCCA 181 ..........................................................355 Ezokola v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2013 SCC 40 ..........................
  • The Long Arm of Canadian Price-Fixing Law? Canadian Jurisdiction Over Foreign Price-Fixing Conspiracies
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Transnational and Cross-Border Criminal Law. Canadian Perspectives Part IV
    • September 12, 2023
    ...their sales into Canada. his might supply the causal connection sought by Perell J. 27 Ibid at para 109. 28 Ewert v Höegh Autoliners AS , 2020 BCCA 181. 29 Ibid at para 76. 30 Ibid at para 77. 31 Pioneer Corp v Godfrey , above note 14. 32 Ibid at para 59. 355 W. Michael G. Osborne 3) Effect......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT