Ewert v. Höegh Autoliners AS,
| Jurisdiction | British Columbia |
| Judge | The Honourable Madam Justice MacKenzie,The Honourable Mr. Justice Fitch,The Honourable Madam Justice Fisher |
| Citation | 2020 BCCA 181 |
| Docket Number | CA44148 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (British Columbia) |
| Date | 29 June 2020 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
37 practice notes
-
Table of Cases
...États-Unis Mexicains c Boily, 2005 QCCA 599.......................................................... 436 Ewert v Höegh Autoliners AS, 2020 BCCA 181 ..........................................................355 Ezokola v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2013 SCC 40 ..........................
-
Canada (Attorney General) v. Scow,
...no jurisdiction to entertain the claim is a question of law to which a correctness standard applies: Ewert v. Höegh Autoliners AS, 2020 BCCA 181 at paras. 42–44. I do not understand the plaintiff to contest this latter [78] A court is not requ......
-
Cleeves v. The Warden and Fellows of St. Antony’s College in the University of Oxford,
...recently provided the framework for assessing a jurisdictional challenge based on territorial competence in Ewert v. Höegh Autoliners AS, 2020 BCCA 181 where MacKenzie J.A. [9] To understand how this application proceeded, it is important to set out the framework for assessing territorial c......
-
2025 BCSC 146,
...The standard of proof is low. The basic jurisdictional facts the plaintiff relies on are taken to be true: Ewert v. Höegh Autoliners AS, 2020 BCCA 181 at para. 16. This is often referred to as the presumption that the pleaded facts are true. The defendant may contest these facts with eviden......
Get Started for Free
39 cases
-
Sinclair v. Venezia Turismo, 2025 SCC 27
...Pasig and Hudson Private Ltd., 2024 ONCA 164 ; Haaretz.com v. Goldhar, 2018 SCC 28 , [2018] 2 S.C.R. 3 ; Ewert v. Höegh Autoliners AS, 2020 BCCA 181, 38 B.C.L.R. (6th) 99 ; Giustra v. Twitter, Inc., 2021 BCCA 466 , 59 B.C.L.R. (6th) 55 ; Eastern Power Ltd. v. Azienda Comunale Energia ......
-
Sinclair v Venezia Turismo,
...v. Pasig and Hudson Private Ltd., 2024 ONCA 164; Haaretz.com v. Goldhar, 2018 SCC 28, [2018] 2 S.C.R. 3; Ewert v. Höegh Autoliners AS, 2020 BCCA 181, 38 B.C.L.R. (6th) 99; Giustra v. Twitter, Inc., 2021 BCCA 466, 59 B.C.L.R. (6th) 55; Eastern Power Ltd. v. Azienda Comunale Energia & Amb......
-
Canada (Attorney General) v. Scow,
...no jurisdiction to entertain the claim is a question of law to which a correctness standard applies: Ewert v. Höegh Autoliners AS, 2020 BCCA 181 at paras. 42–44. I do not understand the plaintiff to contest this latter [78] A court is not requ......
-
Cleeves v. The Warden and Fellows of St. Antony’s College in the University of Oxford,
...recently provided the framework for assessing a jurisdictional challenge based on territorial competence in Ewert v. Höegh Autoliners AS, 2020 BCCA 181 where MacKenzie J.A. [9] To understand how this application proceeded, it is important to set out the framework for assessing territorial c......
Get Started for Free
2 books & journal articles
-
Table of Cases
...États-Unis Mexicains c Boily, 2005 QCCA 599.......................................................... 436 Ewert v Höegh Autoliners AS, 2020 BCCA 181 ..........................................................355 Ezokola v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2013 SCC 40 ..........................
-
The Long Arm of Canadian Price-Fixing Law? Canadian Jurisdiction Over Foreign Price-Fixing Conspiracies
...their sales into Canada. his might supply the causal connection sought by Perell J. 27 Ibid at para 109. 28 Ewert v Höegh Autoliners AS , 2020 BCCA 181. 29 Ibid at para 76. 30 Ibid at para 77. 31 Pioneer Corp v Godfrey , above note 14. 32 Ibid at para 59. 355 W. Michael G. Osborne 3) Effect......