F. v. N., 2022 SCC 51

JurisdictionFederal Jurisdiction (Canada)
CourtSupreme Court (Canada)
JudgeWagner, Richard; Moldaver, Michael J.; Karakatsanis, Andromache; Côté, Suzanne; Brown, Russell; Rowe, Malcolm; Martin, Sheilah; Kasirer, Nicholas; Jamal, Mahmud
Citation2022 SCC 51
Docket Number39875
Date02 December 2022
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
7 practice notes
  • M.A.B. v. M.G.C.,
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • December 22, 2022
    ...the best interests of the child (Young v. Young, [1993] 4 S.C.R. 3 (S.C.C.), at paras. 74 and 202; Gordon, at pp. 50, 54, 68; F. v. N. 2022 SCC 51 (S.C.C.), at para. 61).  As the Supreme Court of Canada stated in King v. Low, [1985] 1 S.C.R. 87 (S.C.C.), at para. 101, the ultimate aim ......
  • MOG v COG,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Alberta)
    • January 19, 2023
    ...and that some evidence about that situation was revealed to Yungwirth J. [6] Can. T.S. 1983 No. 35. [7] Compare, for example, F v N, 2022 SCC 51 at paras 99, 110, 121 (majority) and 171 (dissent), 78 RFL (8th) 253. [8] Taking judicial notice of Court records is even older than The Queen v. ......
  • De Leon Saldierna v. Shergill,
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • February 23, 2023
    ...must be something greater than would normally be expected from taking a child away from one parent and passing them to another: F. v. N., 2022 SCC 51 at para. 79, citing Thomson at 597. [181]    The respondent bears the onus of establishing by way of evidence that is credible......
  • J.K.S. v. M.L.L.A.,
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • December 22, 2022
    ...the Supreme Court of Canada has stated that the onus is on the “abducting parent” to establish serious harm: F. v. N., 2022 SCC 51 at para. 69 [F. v. N.]. The Supreme Court characterized this as a “high threshold” with a “demanding” burden......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
5 cases
  • M.A.B. v. M.G.C.,
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • December 22, 2022
    ...the best interests of the child (Young v. Young, [1993] 4 S.C.R. 3 (S.C.C.), at paras. 74 and 202; Gordon, at pp. 50, 54, 68; F. v. N. 2022 SCC 51 (S.C.C.), at para. 61).  As the Supreme Court of Canada stated in King v. Low, [1985] 1 S.C.R. 87 (S.C.C.), at para. 101, the ultimate aim ......
  • MOG v COG,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Alberta)
    • January 19, 2023
    ...and that some evidence about that situation was revealed to Yungwirth J. [6] Can. T.S. 1983 No. 35. [7] Compare, for example, F v N, 2022 SCC 51 at paras 99, 110, 121 (majority) and 171 (dissent), 78 RFL (8th) 253. [8] Taking judicial notice of Court records is even older than The Queen v. ......
  • Babi v. Chaykhouni,
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • December 16, 2022
    ...Rules. In my view, it did so. Ms. Hamade has been accepted as an expert by our courts on UAE law in other cases (see, for example, F v N, 2022 SCC 51; and Volgemut v Decristoforom, 2021 ONSC 7382). But, to the extent that Babi wanted to challenge Ms. Hamade’s opinion by, for example,......
  • J.K.S. v. M.L.L.A.,
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • December 29, 2022
    ...the Supreme Court of Canada has stated that the onus is on the “abducting parent” to establish serious harm: F. v. N., 2022 SCC 51 at para. 69 [F. v. N.]. The Supreme Court characterized this as a “high threshold” with a “demanding” burden......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT