F. v. N., 2022 SCC 51

JurisdictionFederal Jurisdiction (Canada)
CourtSupreme Court (Canada)
JudgeWagner, Richard; Moldaver, Michael J.; Karakatsanis, Andromache; Côté, Suzanne; Brown, Russell; Rowe, Malcolm; Martin, Sheilah; Kasirer, Nicholas; Jamal, Mahmud
Citation2022 SCC 51
Docket Number39875
Date02 December 2022
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
16 practice notes
  • M.A.B. v. M.G.C.,
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • 22 Diciembre 2022
    ...the best interests of the child (Young v. Young, [1993] 4 S.C.R. 3 (S.C.C.), at paras. 74 and 202; Gordon, at pp. 50, 54, 68; F. v. N. 2022 SCC 51 (S.C.C.), at para. 61).  As the Supreme Court of Canada stated in King v. Low, [1985] 1 S.C.R. 87 (S.C.C.), at para. 101, the ultimate aim ......
  • Mog v Cog,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Alberta)
    • 19 Enero 2023
    ...existence and that some evidence about that situation was revealed to Yungwirth J. 6 Can. T.S. 1983 No. 35. 7 Compare, for example, F v N, 2022 SCC 51 at paras 99, 110, 121 (majority) and 171 (dissent), 78 RFL (8th) 253. 8 Taking judicial notice of Court records is even older than The Queen......
  • MOG v COG,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Alberta)
    • 19 Enero 2023
    ...and that some evidence about that situation was revealed to Yungwirth J. [6] Can. T.S. 1983 No. 35. [7] Compare, for example, F v N, 2022 SCC 51 at paras 99, 110, 121 (majority) and 171 (dissent), 78 RFL (8th) [8] Taking judicial notice of Court records is even older than The Queen v. Jones......
  • 2023 BCSC 584,
    • Canada
    • 1 Enero 2023
    ...and fact specific exercise. In considering this issue, the court should focus on the particular circumstances of the child: F. v. N., 2022 SCC 51 at para. 97 The Supreme Court of Canada in F. v. N. noted the following considerations when determining “serious harm”: a) The chil......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
16 cases
  • M.A.B. v. M.G.C.,
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • 22 Diciembre 2022
    ...the best interests of the child (Young v. Young, [1993] 4 S.C.R. 3 (S.C.C.), at paras. 74 and 202; Gordon, at pp. 50, 54, 68; F. v. N. 2022 SCC 51 (S.C.C.), at para. 61).  As the Supreme Court of Canada stated in King v. Low, [1985] 1 S.C.R. 87 (S.C.C.), at para. 101, the ultimate aim ......
  • Mog v Cog,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Alberta)
    • 19 Enero 2023
    ...existence and that some evidence about that situation was revealed to Yungwirth J. 6 Can. T.S. 1983 No. 35. 7 Compare, for example, F v N, 2022 SCC 51 at paras 99, 110, 121 (majority) and 171 (dissent), 78 RFL (8th) 253. 8 Taking judicial notice of Court records is even older than The Queen......
  • MOG v COG,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Alberta)
    • 19 Enero 2023
    ...and that some evidence about that situation was revealed to Yungwirth J. [6] Can. T.S. 1983 No. 35. [7] Compare, for example, F v N, 2022 SCC 51 at paras 99, 110, 121 (majority) and 171 (dissent), 78 RFL (8th) [8] Taking judicial notice of Court records is even older than The Queen v. Jones......
  • Osaloni v Osaloni,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Alberta)
    • 5 Abril 2023
    ...to automatic return will be met only in “situations that an individual child should not be expected to tolerate”: F v N, 2022 SCC 51 [ F v N] at para 73. It is a high threshold: Ellis v Wentzell-Ellis, 2010 ONCA 347 at para 13 As the parent opposing the children's return,......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT