F.A. v. S.K., 2018 ABPC 276

JudgeN.W. D'Souza
Date26 November 2018
CourtProvincial Court of Alberta (Canada)
Docket NumberFF901000728
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
1 practice notes
  • S.T. v J.T., 2019 SKCA 116
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan)
    • November 8, 2019
    ...would materially change the best interests analysis, she could have applied to again reopen the trial: see, for example, F.A. v S.K., 2018 ABPC 276 at para 101. Although trial judges must exercise their discretion to reopen trials “sparingly and with the greatest care”, they may do so if th......
1 cases
  • S.T. v J.T., 2019 SKCA 116
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan)
    • November 8, 2019
    ...would materially change the best interests analysis, she could have applied to again reopen the trial: see, for example, F.A. v S.K., 2018 ABPC 276 at para 101. Although trial judges must exercise their discretion to reopen trials “sparingly and with the greatest care”, they may do so if th......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT