Fantl v. Transamerica Life Canada, 2013 ONSC 2298

JurisdictionOntario
JudgePerell, J.
CourtSuperior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
Subject MatterFRAUD AND MISREPRESENTATION,PRACTICE,INSURANCE,CONTRACTS
Citation2013 ONSC 2298,[2013] O.T.C. Uned. 2298,[2013] O.T.C. Uned. 2298 (SC)
Date18 April 2013
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
8 practice notes
  • Kinectrics Inc. v. FCL Fisker Customs & Logistics Inc., 2020 ONSC 6748
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • November 3, 2020
    ...ONCA 962, 138 O.R. (3d) 641, at paras. 17, 43, citing West v. Ontario, 2015 ONCA 147, at paras. 2-3; Fantl v. Transamerica Life Canada, 2013 ONSC 2298, 21 C.C.L.I. (5th) 175, at paras. 180-181, varied on other grounds, 2015 ONSC 1367, 125 O.R. (3d) 230 (Div. Ct.), 2016 ONCA 633, 133 O.R. (3......
  • Marshall et al. v. United Furniture Warehouse Limited Partnership et al., [2013] B.C.T.C. Uned. 2050
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • November 8, 2013
    ...is inconsistent with the written contract or does not fit within its terms will not be implied: see Fantl v Transamerica Life Canada , 2013 ONSC 2298 at para. 146, aff'd 2013 ONCA 580. [78] There is also a gap between the allegation that the defendants warranted payment and breached that wa......
  • Setoguchi v Uber B.V., 2021 ABQB 18
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • January 8, 2021
    ...Ontario Ltd. v. Quizno’s Canada Restaurant Corp., 2009, 96 OR (3d) 252, (Quizno’s CA) at para 84; and Fanti v. Transamerica Life Canada, 2013 ONSC 2298 at para 126. [5] Uber says alternatively, absent evidence of actual loss or harm, this application for certification must be used as a “mea......
  • Fantl v. Tansamerica Life Canada, [2013] O.T.C. Uned. 5198
    • Canada
    • Ontario Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • August 9, 2013
    ...REASONS FOR DECISION - COSTS A. INTRODUCTION [1] Perell, J. : By reasons for decision reported as Fantl v. Transamerica Life Canada , 2013 ONSC 2298, I certified this action as a class proceeding under the Class Proceedings Act , 1992 , S.O. 1992, c. 6 . In my Reasons for Decision, I tent......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
8 cases
  • Kinectrics Inc. v. FCL Fisker Customs & Logistics Inc., 2020 ONSC 6748
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • November 3, 2020
    ...ONCA 962, 138 O.R. (3d) 641, at paras. 17, 43, citing West v. Ontario, 2015 ONCA 147, at paras. 2-3; Fantl v. Transamerica Life Canada, 2013 ONSC 2298, 21 C.C.L.I. (5th) 175, at paras. 180-181, varied on other grounds, 2015 ONSC 1367, 125 O.R. (3d) 230 (Div. Ct.), 2016 ONCA 633, 133 O.R. (3......
  • Marshall et al. v. United Furniture Warehouse Limited Partnership et al., [2013] B.C.T.C. Uned. 2050
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • November 8, 2013
    ...is inconsistent with the written contract or does not fit within its terms will not be implied: see Fantl v Transamerica Life Canada , 2013 ONSC 2298 at para. 146, aff'd 2013 ONCA 580. [78] There is also a gap between the allegation that the defendants warranted payment and breached that wa......
  • Setoguchi v Uber B.V., 2021 ABQB 18
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • January 8, 2021
    ...Ontario Ltd. v. Quizno’s Canada Restaurant Corp., 2009, 96 OR (3d) 252, (Quizno’s CA) at para 84; and Fanti v. Transamerica Life Canada, 2013 ONSC 2298 at para 126. [5] Uber says alternatively, absent evidence of actual loss or harm, this application for certification must be used as a “mea......
  • Fantl v. Tansamerica Life Canada, [2013] O.T.C. Uned. 5198
    • Canada
    • Ontario Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • August 9, 2013
    ...REASONS FOR DECISION - COSTS A. INTRODUCTION [1] Perell, J. : By reasons for decision reported as Fantl v. Transamerica Life Canada , 2013 ONSC 2298, I certified this action as a class proceeding under the Class Proceedings Act , 1992 , S.O. 1992, c. 6 . In my Reasons for Decision, I tent......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT