Farah v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 27
| Jurisdiction | Federal Jurisdiction (Canada) |
| Court | Federal Court (Canada) |
| Citation | 2019 FC 27 |
| Date | 09 January 2019 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
3 practice notes
-
Hashi v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 309
...assessing evidence lies at the heartland of the special expertise of the RPD: as stated in Farah v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 27 at para 9 citing Khakimov v Canada, 2017 FC 18 at paras 23-24: [23] ...To begin with, the RPD has broad discretion to prefer certain evidence o......
-
Onkoba v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2023 FC 1184
...based on inconsistencies between an Applicant’s POE evidence and oral testimony (Farah v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 27 at para 21 [Farah]). The Applicant is requesting this Court accept alternative explanations for his discrepancies, which is not the function of ju......
-
Akzibekian v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 278
...of evidence and credibility determination evaluation is the heartland of the RPD’s expertise (Farah v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 27 at para 9). [19] Case law makes it clear that if factual determinations were open to the tribunal to make, and if the conclusion fell within......
3 cases
-
Hashi v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 309
...assessing evidence lies at the heartland of the special expertise of the RPD: as stated in Farah v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 27 at para 9 citing Khakimov v Canada, 2017 FC 18 at paras 23-24: [23] ...To begin with, the RPD has broad discretion to prefer certain evidence o......
-
Onkoba v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2023 FC 1184
...based on inconsistencies between an Applicant’s POE evidence and oral testimony (Farah v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 27 at para 21 [Farah]). The Applicant is requesting this Court accept alternative explanations for his discrepancies, which is not the function of ju......
-
Akzibekian v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 278
...of evidence and credibility determination evaluation is the heartland of the RPD’s expertise (Farah v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 27 at para 9). [19] Case law makes it clear that if factual determinations were open to the tribunal to make, and if the conclusion fell within......