Farallon Mining Ltd. v. Arnold, [2011] B.C.T.C. Uned. 1532 (SC)

JudgeSilverman, J.
CourtSupreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
Case DateThursday November 10, 2011
JurisdictionBritish Columbia
Citations[2011] B.C.T.C. Uned. 1532 (SC);2011 BCSC 1532;[2011] B.C.T.C. Uned. 1532
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
13 practice notes
  • Table of cases
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Remedies: The Law of Damages. Third Edition Limiting Principles
    • June 21, 2014
    ...v Smith, 2010 BCSC 465 ........................................................................... 149 Farallon Mining Ltd v Arnold, 2011 BCSC 1532 ............................................... 321 Farish v National Trust Co (1974), 54 DLR (3d) 426, [1975] 3 WWR 499 (BCSC) .....................
  • Deterring Compensation: Class Action Litigation and Damage Awards Against Corporate Defendants
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books The Canadian Class Action Review No. 12-2, March 2017
    • March 1, 2017
    ...(2005), 76 OR (3d) 60 (SCJ). 114 Kuddus v Chief Constable of Leicestershire, [2001] UKHL 29 at para 79. See Farallon Mining Ltd v Arnold, 2011 BCSC 1532 at para 112 (punitive damages rejected because general damages would have had a significant impact on Volume 12, No. 2 179 Insurance Co,11......
  • Introduction
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books The Canadian Class Action Review No. 12-2, March 2017
    • March 1, 2017
    ...(2005), 76 OR (3d) 60 (SCJ). 114 Kuddus v Chief Constable of Leicestershire, [2001] UKHL 29 at para 79. See Farallon Mining Ltd v Arnold, 2011 BCSC 1532 at para 112 (punitive damages rejected because general damages would have had a significant impact on Volume 12, No. 2 179 Insurance Co,11......
  • Punitive Damages
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Remedies: The Law of Damages. Third Edition Non-compensatory Damages
    • June 21, 2014
    ...suffered loss of dignity and humiliation.” Ibid at para 30. 6 Whiten , above note 1 at para 157. 7 See Farallon Mining Ltd v Arnold , 2011 BCSC 1532 at para 112, involving Internet defamation, where the plaintiff was awarded $40,000 in general damages. The court rejected the plaintiff’s cla......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
4 cases
  • Seafarers' International Union of Canada v. Mitchelitis,
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • April 24, 2023
    ...Gilmore J. relied on a number of decisions, including Ironside v. Delazzari, 2014 ONSC 999 ($50,000), Farallon Mining Ltd. v. Arnold, 2011 BCSC 1532 ($40,000), and Focus Graphite v. Douglas, 2015 ONSC 1104 [49]           The Ontario Court of......
  • British Columbia Recreation and Parks Association et al. v. Zakharia et al., [2015] B.C.T.C. Uned. 1650 (SC)
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • September 14, 2015
    ...[97] The plaintiffs will also be granted permanent injunction to prohibit any further defamation. In Farallon Mining Ltd. v. Arnold , 2011 BCSC 1532 (at para. 114), Justice Silverman adopted Justice Chapnik's language in Astley v. Verdun , 2011 ONSC 3541: Permanent injunctions have consiste......
  • Premier Finance Ltd. v. Ginther, 2022 BCSC 1461
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • August 24, 2022
    ...not receive large awards for loss of reputation, unless economic loss is also shown. … See also Farallon Mining Ltd. v. Arnold, 2011 BCSC 1532 at paras. [44]       Proof of economic loss that is insufficient to support a claim for special damages may ass......
  • Scotia Capital Inc. v. Aphria Inc., 2021 ONSC 1469
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • March 3, 2021
    ...2007 BCSC 49, the court had specific evidence of a decline in bookings following the defamation. In Farallon Mining Ltd. v. Arnold, 2011 BCSC 1532, the court found motive on the part of defendants to cause economic damage and drive down the share price. In the case at bar, there is no evide......
9 books & journal articles
  • Table of cases
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Remedies: The Law of Damages. Third Edition Limiting Principles
    • June 21, 2014
    ...v Smith, 2010 BCSC 465 ........................................................................... 149 Farallon Mining Ltd v Arnold, 2011 BCSC 1532 ............................................... 321 Farish v National Trust Co (1974), 54 DLR (3d) 426, [1975] 3 WWR 499 (BCSC) .....................
  • Deterring Compensation: Class Action Litigation and Damage Awards Against Corporate Defendants
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books The Canadian Class Action Review No. 12-2, March 2017
    • March 1, 2017
    ...(2005), 76 OR (3d) 60 (SCJ). 114 Kuddus v Chief Constable of Leicestershire, [2001] UKHL 29 at para 79. See Farallon Mining Ltd v Arnold, 2011 BCSC 1532 at para 112 (punitive damages rejected because general damages would have had a significant impact on Volume 12, No. 2 179 Insurance Co,11......
  • Introduction
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books The Canadian Class Action Review No. 12-2, March 2017
    • March 1, 2017
    ...(2005), 76 OR (3d) 60 (SCJ). 114 Kuddus v Chief Constable of Leicestershire, [2001] UKHL 29 at para 79. See Farallon Mining Ltd v Arnold, 2011 BCSC 1532 at para 112 (punitive damages rejected because general damages would have had a significant impact on Volume 12, No. 2 179 Insurance Co,11......
  • Punitive Damages
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Remedies: The Law of Damages. Third Edition Non-compensatory Damages
    • June 21, 2014
    ...suffered loss of dignity and humiliation.” Ibid at para 30. 6 Whiten , above note 1 at para 157. 7 See Farallon Mining Ltd v Arnold , 2011 BCSC 1532 at para 112, involving Internet defamation, where the plaintiff was awarded $40,000 in general damages. The court rejected the plaintiff’s cla......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT