Farm Credit Canada v Gustafson, 2021 SKCA 38

JurisdictionSaskatchewan
CourtCourt of Appeal (Saskatchewan)
JudgeRichards C.J.S., Jackson and Schwann JJ.A.
Citation2021 SKCA 38
Docket NumberCACV3403
Date11 March 2021
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
9 practice notes
  • Haas v The Saskatchewan Veterinary Medical Association,
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Saskatchewan (Canada)
    • December 19, 2022
    ...be adopted, while those that defeat or undermine legislative purpose should be avoided (Sullivan at §9.3; Farm Credit Canada v Gustafson, 2021 SKCA 38 at para [28] Context must also be taken into account. As Sullivan observes, at §2.19, “in hard cases the contextual factors point in differe......
  • Regina Bypass Design Builders v Supreme Steel LP,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan)
    • May 26, 2021
    ...be adopted, while those that defeat or undermine legislative purpose should be avoided (Sullivan at §9.3; Farm Credit Canada v Gustafson, 2021 SKCA 38 at para [28] Context must also be taken into account. As Sullivan observes, at §2.19, “in hard cases the contextual factors point in differe......
  • Manderscheid v Humboldt Smiles Dental Studios Inc., 2021 SKCA 42
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan)
    • March 19, 2021
    ...with the scheme of the Act, the object of the Act and the intention of the Legislature”. See also, Farm Credit Canada v Gustafson, 2021 SKCA 38. [28]        In applying this analysis to the matter at hand, it is my view that I should be circumspect ......
  • Cimmer v Niessner,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan)
    • May 18, 2022
    ...while those that defeat or undermine legislative purpose should be avoided (Sullivan at §9.3; Farm Credit Canada v Gustafson, 2021 SKCA 38 at para 58). [28] Context must also be taken into account. As Sullivan observes, at §2.19, “in hard cases the contextual factors p......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
8 cases
  • Regina Bypass Design Builders v Supreme Steel LP,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan)
    • May 26, 2021
    ...while those that defeat or undermine legislative purpose should be avoided (Sullivan at §9.3; Farm Credit Canada v Gustafson, 2021 SKCA 38 at para [28]        Context must also be taken into account. As Sullivan observes, at §2.19, “in har......
  • Manderscheid v Humboldt Smiles Dental Studios Inc., 2021 SKCA 42
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan)
    • March 19, 2021
    ...with the scheme of the Act, the object of the Act and the intention of the Legislature”. See also, Farm Credit Canada v Gustafson, 2021 SKCA 38. [28]        In applying this analysis to the matter at hand, it is my view that I should be circumspect ......
  • Cimmer v Niessner,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan)
    • May 18, 2022
    ...while those that defeat or undermine legislative purpose should be avoided (Sullivan at §9.3; Farm Credit Canada v Gustafson, 2021 SKCA 38 at para 58). [28] Context must also be taken into account. As Sullivan observes, at §2.19, “in hard cases the contextual factors p......
  • Freeborne Developments Ltd. v Corman Park (Rural Municipality), 2021 SKCA 48
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan)
    • March 30, 2021
    ...of The Legislation Act demand a purposive analysis, as Jackson J.A. recently explained in Farm Credit Canada v Gustafson, 2021 SKCA 38: [58]     At least since the Supreme Court released Rizzo in 1998, courts have been required to adopt a purposive analysis &#x......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT