Farm Credit Canada v Gustafson,
| Jurisdiction | Saskatchewan |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan) |
| Judge | Richards C.J.S., Jackson and Schwann JJ.A. |
| Neutral Citation | 2021 SKCA 38 |
| Citation | 2021 SKCA 38 |
| Docket Number | CACV3403 |
| Date | 11 March 2021 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
2 practice notes
-
Cimmer v Niessner,
...while those that defeat or undermine legislative purpose should be avoided (Sullivan at §9.3; Farm Credit Canada v Gustafson, 2021 SKCA 38 at para 58). [28] Context must also be taken into account. As Sullivan observes, at §2.19, “in hard cases the contextual factors p......
-
Altus Group Limited v Estevan (City),
...while those that defeat or undermine legislative purpose should be avoided (Sullivan at §9.3; Farm Credit Canada v Gustafson, 2021 SKCA 38 at para 58). [28] Context must also be taken into account. As Sullivan observes, at §2.19, “in hard cases the contextual factors p......
2 cases
-
Cimmer v Niessner,
...while those that defeat or undermine legislative purpose should be avoided (Sullivan at §9.3; Farm Credit Canada v Gustafson, 2021 SKCA 38 at para 58). [28] Context must also be taken into account. As Sullivan observes, at §2.19, “in hard cases the contextual factors p......
-
Altus Group Limited v Estevan (City),
...while those that defeat or undermine legislative purpose should be avoided (Sullivan at §9.3; Farm Credit Canada v Gustafson, 2021 SKCA 38 at para 58). [28] Context must also be taken into account. As Sullivan observes, at §2.19, “in hard cases the contextual factors p......