Farrokhmanesh v. Sahib et al., [2010] B.C.T.C. Uned. 497
| Court | Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada) |
| Case Date | April 14, 2010 |
| Jurisdiction | British Columbia |
| Citations | [2010] B.C.T.C. Uned. 497;[2010] B.C.T.C. Uned. 497 (SC Reg.);2010 BCSC 497 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
9 practice notes
-
Farrokhmanesh v. Sahib et al., [2010] B.C.T.C. Uned. 1797
...the oral argument. The application is to review the assessment of costs of District Registrar Sainty dated April 14, 2010, reported at 2010 BCSC 497 (the "Decision"). [2] In her Decision, the Registrar disallowed two of the plaintiff's disbursements, namely, MRI scans in the amount of $2,27......
-
Ouellette v. Nguyen, 2020 BCSC 366
...and proper] work, and based on the evidence presented, that was done in relation to each of the actions: Farrokhmanesh v. Sabib, 2010 BCSC 497 at paras. 7 and The Plaintiff’s Bills [35] While the onus is on the plaintiff to prove the nec......
-
Thorogood v. Roberts, 2014 BCSC 2213
...diagnosed chronic pain and depression arising from the accident. [32] The defendants submit that the case of Farrokhmanesh v. Sahib , 2010 BCSC 497 at paras. 52 and 53 applies, wherein District Registrar Sainty found that it was not necessary or proper to have both a psychiatrist and a psyc......
-
Perone v. Baron, [2012] B.C.T.C. Uned. 912
...guideline amounts. [20] There seems to be some confusion as to precisely what the registrar's rate is. In Farrokhmanesh v. Sahib, 2010 BCSC 497, Registrar Sainty clarifies that the registrar's rate is as set out in Administration Notice 5; namely 25¢ per page. That was an ass......
Request a trial to view additional results
9 cases
-
Farrokhmanesh v. Sahib et al., [2010] B.C.T.C. Uned. 1797
...the oral argument. The application is to review the assessment of costs of District Registrar Sainty dated April 14, 2010, reported at 2010 BCSC 497 (the "Decision"). [2] In her Decision, the Registrar disallowed two of the plaintiff's disbursements, namely, MRI scans in the amount of $2,27......
-
Ouellette v. Nguyen, 2020 BCSC 366
...and proper] work, and based on the evidence presented, that was done in relation to each of the actions: Farrokhmanesh v. Sabib, 2010 BCSC 497 at paras. 7 and The Plaintiff’s Bills [35] While the onus is on the plaintiff to prove the nec......
-
Thorogood v. Roberts, 2014 BCSC 2213
...diagnosed chronic pain and depression arising from the accident. [32] The defendants submit that the case of Farrokhmanesh v. Sahib , 2010 BCSC 497 at paras. 52 and 53 applies, wherein District Registrar Sainty found that it was not necessary or proper to have both a psychiatrist and a psyc......
-
Perone v. Baron, [2012] B.C.T.C. Uned. 912
...guideline amounts. [20] There seems to be some confusion as to precisely what the registrar's rate is. In Farrokhmanesh v. Sahib, 2010 BCSC 497, Registrar Sainty clarifies that the registrar's rate is as set out in Administration Notice 5; namely 25¢ per page. That was an ass......
Request a trial to view additional results