Fauser Energy Inc. v Skjerven, 2019 SKCA 81
| Jurisdiction | Saskatchewan |
| Judge | Richards,Jackson,Caldwell |
| Citation | 2019 SKCA 81 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan) |
| Date | 22 August 2019 |
| Docket Number | CACV3212 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
5 practice notes
-
SUN COUNTRY REGIONAL HEALTH AUTHORITY v. MAMCHUR,
...SCRHA particularly references Fauser Energy Inc. v Skjerven, 2019 SKCA 81, 437 DLR (4th) 345 where at para. 62, Jackson J.A. for the court quoted with approval from Clearly Canadian Beverage Corp. v Remic Marketing & Distribution Inc. (1992), 22 CPC (3d) 387 (WL) (BCSC) [Clearly Canadia......
-
Malish v. 2407077 Ontario Limited, 2021 BCSC 2448
...Malish relies on Ulker Holdings Inc. v. AES Engineering Ltd., 2020 BCSC 1823; Skjerven v. Fauser Energy Inc., 2018 SKQB 41, aff’d 2019 SKCA 81; and Coolbreeze Ranch Ltd. v. Morgan Creek Tropicals Ltd., 2009 BCSC 151, as authorities for the proposition that this action should be deter......
-
Poffenroth Agri Ltd. v Brown, 2020 SKCA 68
...so plainly wrong as to amount to an injustice (Rimmer v Adshead, 2002 SKCA 12 at para 58, [2002] 4 WWR 119; Fauser Energy Inc. v Skjerven, 2019 SKCA 81 at para 55, [2020] 1 WWR 635). [48] The merit criterion also requires the Court to consider whether the proposed appeal is apt to unduly de......
-
Third Eye Capital Corporation v Tobber,
...An example can be found in the Saskatchewan Court of Appeal decision in Fauser Energy Inc. v Skjerven, 2019 SKCA 81, 2019 CarswellSask 407, where the Court (noting the Alberta Court of Appeal decision in Royal Trust Corp. of Canada v Kendal Adjusters Ltd., 1984 ABCA 241, 1984 CarswellAlta 9......
Request a trial to view additional results
5 cases
-
SUN COUNTRY REGIONAL HEALTH AUTHORITY v. MAMCHUR,
...SCRHA particularly references Fauser Energy Inc. v Skjerven, 2019 SKCA 81, 437 DLR (4th) 345 where at para. 62, Jackson J.A. for the court quoted with approval from Clearly Canadian Beverage Corp. v Remic Marketing & Distribution Inc. (1992), 22 CPC (3d) 387 (WL) (BCSC) [Clearly Canadia......
-
Malish v. 2407077 Ontario Limited, 2021 BCSC 2448
...Malish relies on Ulker Holdings Inc. v. AES Engineering Ltd., 2020 BCSC 1823; Skjerven v. Fauser Energy Inc., 2018 SKQB 41, aff’d 2019 SKCA 81; and Coolbreeze Ranch Ltd. v. Morgan Creek Tropicals Ltd., 2009 BCSC 151, as authorities for the proposition that this action should be deter......
-
Poffenroth Agri Ltd. v Brown, 2020 SKCA 68
...so plainly wrong as to amount to an injustice (Rimmer v Adshead, 2002 SKCA 12 at para 58, [2002] 4 WWR 119; Fauser Energy Inc. v Skjerven, 2019 SKCA 81 at para 55, [2020] 1 WWR 635). [48] The merit criterion also requires the Court to consider whether the proposed appeal is apt to unduly de......
-
Third Eye Capital Corporation v Tobber,
...An example can be found in the Saskatchewan Court of Appeal decision in Fauser Energy Inc. v Skjerven, 2019 SKCA 81, 2019 CarswellSask 407, where the Court (noting the Alberta Court of Appeal decision in Royal Trust Corp. of Canada v Kendal Adjusters Ltd., 1984 ABCA 241, 1984 CarswellAlta 9......
Request a trial to view additional results