Feeney v. Canada,

JurisdictionFederal Jurisdiction (Canada)
CourtCourt of Appeal (Canada)
Citation2022 FCA 190
Date07 November 2022

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
20 practice notes
  • Bigeagle v. Canada,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Canada)
    • June 6, 2023
    ...FCA 191 at para. 29). A palpable and overriding error is one that is obvious and affects the outcome of the case (Feeney v. Canada , 2022 FCA 190 at para. 4). [27] The decision to grant or deny leave to amend pleadings is a discretionary one that is equally subject to review on the standa......
  • Feeney v Hobbs,
    • Canada
    • Court of King's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • March 15, 2023
    ...in the Right of Alberta, 2021 ABCA 255 (Feeney ABCA #5)), and the Federal Court of Canada (Feeney v Canada, 2021 FC 1213 , aff’d 2022 FCA 190). Both the Court of Appeal of Alberta and Court of King’s Bench of Alberta have also imposed controls on Mr. Feeney’s communi......
  • Hutton v. Sayat,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Canada)
    • March 21, 2025
    ...matters as “doomed to fail” was discretionary: Turmel v. Canada (Attorney General), 2023 FCA 197 at para. 7 [Turmel]; Feeney v. Canada, 2022 FCA 190 at para. 4; Democracy Watch v. Canada (Prime Minister), 2023 FCA 41 at para. 11. This Court will not intervene unless the Federal Court erred ......
  • Magren Holdings Ltd v. Canada,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Canada)
    • November 28, 2024
    ...bind future panels of this Court: Miller v. Canada (Attorney General) 2002 FCA 370 , 220 D.L.R. (4th) 149 at para. 9; Feeney v. Canada, 2022 FCA 190, 2022 A.C.W.S. 5833 at para. 16; Chen v. Canada, 2023 FCA 146 , 2023 A.C.W.S. 2685 . Exceptional circumstances exist “where the decisio......
  • Get Started for Free
20 cases
  • Bigeagle v. Canada
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Canada)
    • June 6, 2023
    ...FCA 191 at para. 29). A palpable and overriding error is one that is obvious and affects the outcome of the case (Feeney v. Canada , 2022 FCA 190 at para. 4). [27] The decision to grant or deny leave to amend pleadings is a discretionary one that is equally subject to review on the standa......
  • Feeney v Hobbs
    • Canada
    • Court of King's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • March 15, 2023
    ...in the Right of Alberta, 2021 ABCA 255 (Feeney ABCA #5)), and the Federal Court of Canada (Feeney v Canada, 2021 FC 1213 , aff’d 2022 FCA 190). Both the Court of Appeal of Alberta and Court of King’s Bench of Alberta have also imposed controls on Mr. Feeney’s communi......
  • Hutton v. Sayat
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Canada)
    • March 21, 2025
    ...matters as “doomed to fail” was discretionary: Turmel v. Canada (Attorney General), 2023 FCA 197 at para. 7 [Turmel]; Feeney v. Canada, 2022 FCA 190 at para. 4; Democracy Watch v. Canada (Prime Minister), 2023 FCA 41 at para. 11. This Court will not intervene unless the Federal Court erred ......
  • Magren Holdings Ltd v. Canada
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Canada)
    • November 28, 2024
    ...bind future panels of this Court: Miller v. Canada (Attorney General) 2002 FCA 370 , 220 D.L.R. (4th) 149 at para. 9; Feeney v. Canada, 2022 FCA 190, 2022 A.C.W.S. 5833 at para. 16; Chen v. Canada, 2023 FCA 146 , 2023 A.C.W.S. 2685 . Exceptional circumstances exist “where the decisio......
  • Get Started for Free