Feng v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 18
| Jurisdiction | Federal Jurisdiction (Canada) |
| Court | Federal Court (Canada) |
| Date | 08 January 2019 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
8 practice notes
-
Association canadienne des avocats et avocates en droit des réfugiés c. Canada (Citoyenneté et Immigration),
...(3d) 558; Araya Atencio v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), 2006 FC 571 ; Feng v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 18.CONSIDERED:Maldonado v. Minister of Employment and Immigration, [1980] 2 F.C. 302 , (1979), 31 N.R. 34 (C.A.); X (Re), 2018 CanLII 52123 (I......
-
Canadian Association of Refugee Lawyers v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 1126
...at paragraphs 89–90 above. [146] The second additional case relied upon by the Intervener is Feng v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 18 at para 29 [Feng]. There, Justice Gleeson rejected the argument that the RAD had fettered its discretion by applying the China JG. He did so a......
-
Manan v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 150
...alleged injuries, both physical and psychological, rather than what it doesn’t: Feng v Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 18 at para 37. [40] Second, I note the RAD illogically discounted the psychological report or letter of clinical psychologist. While the report wa......
-
Tahzibi v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2022 FC 42
...v Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), 2016 FC 464 at paras 22-24, Feng v Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 18 at para 37. Ms. Tahzibi submits the RAD failed to accept the arrest notification for what it says, and it was unreasonable to expect further co......
Request a trial to view additional results
8 cases
-
Association canadienne des avocats et avocates en droit des réfugiés c. Canada (Citoyenneté et Immigration),
...(3d) 558; Araya Atencio v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), 2006 FC 571 ; Feng v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 18.CONSIDERED:Maldonado v. Minister of Employment and Immigration, [1980] 2 F.C. 302 , (1979), 31 N.R. 34 (C.A.); X (Re), 2018 CanLII 52123 (I......
-
Canadian Association of Refugee Lawyers v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 1126
...at paragraphs 89–90 above. [146] The second additional case relied upon by the Intervener is Feng v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 18 at para 29 [Feng]. There, Justice Gleeson rejected the argument that the RAD had fettered its discretion by applying the China JG. He did so a......
-
Manan v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 150
...alleged injuries, both physical and psychological, rather than what it doesn’t: Feng v Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 18 at para 37. [40] Second, I note the RAD illogically discounted the psychological report or letter of clinical psychologist. While the report wa......
-
Tahzibi v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2022 FC 42
...v Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), 2016 FC 464 at paras 22-24, Feng v Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 18 at para 37. Ms. Tahzibi submits the RAD failed to accept the arrest notification for what it says, and it was unreasonable to expect further co......
Request a trial to view additional results