Feng v Saskatchewan (Economy)
| Jurisdiction | Saskatchewan |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan) |
| Judge | Ottenbreit, Ryan-Froslie and Schwann JJ.A. |
| Citation | 2020 SKCA 6 |
| Docket Number | CACV3196 |
| Date | 09 January 2020 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
27 practice notes
-
Table of cases
...Resources Inc, 2019 ONCA 508 .................................................................. 742 Thomas v Input Capital Corp, 2020 SKCA 6 ..........................................16, 376–77 PERSONAL PROPERTY SECURITY LAW 826 Thomas v Silvia (1994), 14 ACSR 446 ................................
-
HOSSEINI v. THE COLLEGE OF DENTAL SURGEONS OF SASKATCHEWAN
...Saskatoon (City) v Amalgamated Transit Union, Local 615, 2017 SKCA 96 at paras 24 to 32, [2018] 4 WWR 822, Feng v Saskatchewan (Economy), 2020 SKCA 6 at para 43, 70 Admin LR (6th) 237 and South East Cornerstone School Division No. 209 v Oberg, 2021 SKCA 28 at para E.     ......
-
Sran v. University of Saskatchewan Academic Misconduct Appeal Board
...653 [Vavilov], he concluded that a correctness standard applied (at paras 21–24, citing Akpan at para 20, Feng v Saskatchewan (Economy), 2020 SKCA 6 at para 43, 70 Admin LR (6th) 237; Bergeron v Canada (Attorney General), 2015 FCA 160 at paras 67–71, 99 Admin LR (5th) [21] The Chambers judg......
-
KDM Constructors LP v. The International Union of Operating Engineers Local 870
...determine whether the process used “accords with the underlying values reflected by the duty of fairness” :Feng v Saskatchewan (Economy), 2020 SKCA 6 at para 45, 70 Admin LR (6th) 237 [Feng], quoting Mercredi v Saskatoon Provincial Correctional Centre, 2019 SKCA 86 at para 29, [2020] 4 WWR ......
Get Started for Free
26 cases
-
HOSSEINI v. THE COLLEGE OF DENTAL SURGEONS OF SASKATCHEWAN
...Saskatoon (City) v Amalgamated Transit Union, Local 615, 2017 SKCA 96 at paras 24 to 32, [2018] 4 WWR 822, Feng v Saskatchewan (Economy), 2020 SKCA 6 at para 43, 70 Admin LR (6th) 237 and South East Cornerstone School Division No. 209 v Oberg, 2021 SKCA 28 at para E.     ......
-
Sran v. University of Saskatchewan Academic Misconduct Appeal Board
...653 [Vavilov], he concluded that a correctness standard applied (at paras 21–24, citing Akpan at para 20, Feng v Saskatchewan (Economy), 2020 SKCA 6 at para 43, 70 Admin LR (6th) 237; Bergeron v Canada (Attorney General), 2015 FCA 160 at paras 67–71, 99 Admin LR (5th) [21] The Chambers judg......
-
KDM Constructors LP v. The International Union of Operating Engineers Local 870
...determine whether the process used “accords with the underlying values reflected by the duty of fairness” :Feng v Saskatchewan (Economy), 2020 SKCA 6 at para 45, 70 Admin LR (6th) 237 [Feng], quoting Mercredi v Saskatoon Provincial Correctional Centre, 2019 SKCA 86 at para 29, [2020] 4 WWR ......
-
RURAL MUNICIPALITY OF ARBORFIELD NO. 456 v. BOARD OF EDUCATION OF THE NORTH EAST SCHOOL DIVISION OF SASKATCHEWAN
...v Saskatoon Provincial Correctional Centre, 2019 SKCA 86 at paras 26‑29, [2020] 4 WWR 212 [Mercredi]; and Feng v Saskatchewan (Economy), 2020 SKCA 6 (Sask. C.A.) at paras 43‑46, 70 Admin LR (6th) 237 [Feng], also discuss this standard. Both also emphasize that in deciding what is fair in th......
Get Started for Free
1 books & journal articles
-
Table of cases
...Resources Inc, 2019 ONCA 508 .................................................................. 742 Thomas v Input Capital Corp, 2020 SKCA 6 ..........................................16, 376–77 PERSONAL PROPERTY SECURITY LAW 826 Thomas v Silvia (1994), 14 ACSR 446 ................................
