Feng v Saskatchewan (Economy), 2020 SKCA 6

JudgeOttenbreit, Ryan-Froslie and Schwann JJ.A.
CourtCourt of Appeal (Saskatchewan)
Case DateJanuary 09, 2020
JurisdictionSaskatchewan
Citations2020 SKCA 6
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
17 practice notes
  • Table of cases
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Personal Property Security Law - Third Edition
    • 26 July 2022
    ...Resources Inc, 2019 ONCA 508 .................................................................. 742 Thomas v Input Capital Corp, 2020 SKCA 6 ..........................................16, 376–77 PERSONAL PROPERTY SECURITY LAW 826 Thomas v Silvia (1994), 14 ACSR 446 ................................
  • HOSSEINI v. THE COLLEGE OF DENTAL SURGEONS OF SASKATCHEWAN,
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Saskatchewan (Canada)
    • 12 January 2022
    ...Saskatoon (City) v Amalgamated Transit Union, Local 615, 2017 SKCA 96 at paras 24 to 32, [2018] 4 WWR 822, Feng v Saskatchewan (Economy), 2020 SKCA 6 at para 43, 70 Admin LR (6th) 237 and South East Cornerstone School Division No. 209 v Oberg, 2021 SKCA 28 at para E.     ......
  • Akpan v The University of Saskatchewan Council,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan)
    • 29 September 2021
    ...Provincial Correctional Centre, 2019 SKCA 86 at paras 26–29, [2020] 4 WWR 212 [Mercredi]; and Feng v Saskatchewan (Economy), 2020 SKCA 6 at paras 43–46, 70 Admin LR (6th) 237 [Feng], also discuss this standard. Both also emphasize that in deciding what is fair in the circumsta......
  • SRAN v. UNIVERSITY OF SASKATCHEWAN ACADEMIC MISCONDUCT APPEAL BOARD,
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Saskatchewan (Canada)
    • 4 November 2021
    ...For now, the Court of Appeal has been clear in Akpan and numerous other decisions, including Feng v Saskatchewan (Economy), 2020 SKCA 6 at para 43, 70 Admin LR (6th) 237 [Feng], that the standard of review on procedural fairness issues is correctness. That is the standard that I w......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
16 cases
  • HOSSEINI v. THE COLLEGE OF DENTAL SURGEONS OF SASKATCHEWAN,
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Saskatchewan (Canada)
    • 12 January 2022
    ...Saskatoon (City) v Amalgamated Transit Union, Local 615, 2017 SKCA 96 at paras 24 to 32, [2018] 4 WWR 822, Feng v Saskatchewan (Economy), 2020 SKCA 6 at para 43, 70 Admin LR (6th) 237 and South East Cornerstone School Division No. 209 v Oberg, 2021 SKCA 28 at para E.     ......
  • Akpan v The University of Saskatchewan Council,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan)
    • 29 September 2021
    ...Provincial Correctional Centre, 2019 SKCA 86 at paras 26–29, [2020] 4 WWR 212 [Mercredi]; and Feng v Saskatchewan (Economy), 2020 SKCA 6 at paras 43–46, 70 Admin LR (6th) 237 [Feng], also discuss this standard. Both also emphasize that in deciding what is fair in the circumsta......
  • SRAN v. UNIVERSITY OF SASKATCHEWAN ACADEMIC MISCONDUCT APPEAL BOARD,
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Saskatchewan (Canada)
    • 4 November 2021
    ...For now, the Court of Appeal has been clear in Akpan and numerous other decisions, including Feng v Saskatchewan (Economy), 2020 SKCA 6 at para 43, 70 Admin LR (6th) 237 [Feng], that the standard of review on procedural fairness issues is correctness. That is the standard that I w......
  • Yashcheshen v Canada (Attorney General),
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan)
    • 31 August 2021
    ...a question of law. Questions such as these are reviewable on a correctness standard (see, for example: Feng v Saskatchewan (Economy), 2020 SKCA 6 at para 43, 70 Admin LR (6th) 237; and Harpold v Saskatchewan (Corrections and Policing), 2020 SKCA 98 at para 21 [74]    &#x......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
  • Table of cases
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Personal Property Security Law - Third Edition
    • 26 July 2022
    ...Resources Inc, 2019 ONCA 508 .................................................................. 742 Thomas v Input Capital Corp, 2020 SKCA 6 ..........................................16, 376–77 PERSONAL PROPERTY SECURITY LAW 826 Thomas v Silvia (1994), 14 ACSR 446 ................................

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT