Field notes.

Society is quite rightly concerned about instances of physicians negatively impacted by health conditions who continue to practice without proper management, and numerous examples have been widely publicized and reported by the media. This raises questions not only about such impacts on practice but with respect to the regulatory regimes established to protect the public. While such legitimate societal concerns must be addressed, it is also of critical importance that physicians do not face unreasonable barriers to receive the assistance and treatment they need, and that the medical community continue to work towards reducing the hurdles physicians face associated with seeking health care generally, and in particular with respect to conditions that have been associated with stigma.

Regulatory bodies address issues of public safety through application processes established for physicians to practice medicine (i.e. the licensure application and renewal process; the on-going competency assessment process), creation of procedures for physicians and others to follow to report physicians to their regulatory body if and when certain thresholds are met, and programs established to monitor and manage physicians when involvement with the regulatory body becomes necessary, whether through disciplinary or alternative measures. Regulatory bodies in some jurisdictions, Alberta included, utilize approaches that focus on addressing issues wherever possible within the context of a treatment and monitoring regime, separate and apart from the disciplinary process, moving to such measures infrequently and only when necessary to protect the public.

Physician health and wellness programs (PHPs) exist in a variety of jurisdictions as one mechanism to ensure that physicians whose practices are, or are at-risk of, being...