Fila Canada Inc. v. Jane Doe et al., (1996) 114 F.T.R. 155 (TD)

• Judge: Reed, J.
• Court: Federal Court (Canada)
• Case Date: March 19, 1996
• Jurisdiction: Canada (Federal)
• Citations: (1996), 114 F.T.R. 155 (TD)

Fila Can. Inc. v. Jane Doe (1996), 114 F.T.R. 155 (TD)

MLB headnote and full text

In The Matter Of ss. 7, 9, 19, 20, 25, 50, 52 and 53 of the Trade-marks Act, R.S.C. 1985, c. T-13

Fila Canada Inc. (plaintiff) v. Jane Doe and John Doe and Other Persons, Names Unknown, Who Offer For Sale, Sell, Import, Manufacture, Distribute, Advertise, Or Deal in Unauthorized or Counterfeit Fila Merchandise, and Those Persons Listed in Schedule "A" To The Statement of Claim (defendants)

(T-2523-95)

Indexed As: Fila Canada Inc. v. Jane Doe et al.

Federal Court of Canada

Trial Division

Reed, J.

May 29, 1996.

Summary:

The plaintiff brought a motion to obtain a "roll­ing" Anton Piller Order against Jane Doe and John Doe defendants. The unknown defend­ants were allegedly infringing intel­lectual property rights belonging to the plaintiff, but in different places, at different times and in different circumstances.

The Federal Court of Canada, Trial Divi­sion, issued a rolling Anton Piller Order on terms significantly different from that which was originally sought.

Civil Rights - Topic 1506

Property - Charter - Application of - The Federal Court of Canada, Trial Division, stated that s. 8 of the Charter was not confined to search and seizures by police officers or investigators pursuant to statu­tory powers and that it was at least argu­able that it applied to the civil search and seizures authorized by the court under an Anton Piller Order - See paragraph 6.

Injunctions - Topic 1785

Interlocutory or interim injunctions - Preservation of status quo - Seizure (An­ton Piller Order) - [See Practice - Topic 3379.2 ].

Practice - Topic 3379

Interim proceedings - Preservation of property - Anton Piller Order - Evidence - The Federal Court of Canada, Trial Division, commented on the practice for seeking a "rolling" Anton Piller Order - See paragraphs 7 to 10 - The court also discussed the need for a supervising so­licitor to be in attendance on all executions of the order - See paragraphs 11 to 17.

Practice - Topic 3379.1

Interim proceedings - Preservation of property - Anton Piller Order - Condi­tions precedent - [See Practice - Topic 3379 ].

Practice - Topic 3379.2

Interim proceedings - Preservation of property - Anton Piller Order - When available - The plaintiff brought a motion to obtain a "rolling" Anton Piller Order against Jane Doe and John Doe defendants - The unknown defendants were allegedly in­fringing intellectual property rights be­longing to the plaintiff, but in different places, at different times and in different circum­stances - The Federal Court of Canada, Trial Division, issued a rolling Anton Piller Order on terms significantly different from that which was originally sought.

Practice - Topic 3379.3

Interim proceedings - Preservation of property - Anton Piller Order - Setting aside - The Federal Court of Canada, Trial Division, discussed what was expected on a motion for review of the execution of a "rolling" Anton Piller Order - See para­graphs 18 to 21.

Cases Noticed:

Société pour l'Avancement des Droits en Audiovisuel (SADA) Ltée v. Collège Edouard-Montpetit, [1981] 2 F.C. 307; 39 N.R. 508 (F.C.A.), refd to. [para. 4].

Piller (Anton) K.G. v. Manufacturing Pro­cesses Ltd., [1976] Ch. 55 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 5, footnote 1].

Southam Inc. v. Hunter, [1984] 2 S.C.R. 145; 55 N.R. 241; 55 A.R. 291; 9 C.R.R. 355; 14 C.C.C.(3d) 97; 41 C.R.(3d) 97; [1984] 6 W.W.R. 577; 33 Alta. L.R.(2d) 193; 27 B.L.R. 297; 84 D.T.C. 6467; 2 C.P.R.(3d) 1; 11 D.L.R.(4th) 641, refd to. [para. 6].

Nintendo of America Inc. v. Coinex Video Games Inc. et al. (1982), 46 N.R. 311; 69 C.P.R.(2d) 122 (F.C.A.), refd to. [para. 9].

Authors and Works Noticed:

Rock, A.M., The "Anton Piller" Order: An Examination of its Nature, Develop­ment and Present Position in Canada (1984-85), 5 Adv. Q. 191, generally [para. 5, footnote 1].

Takach, G., Exploring the Outer Limits: The Anton Piller Order in Canada (1985), 23 Alta. L.R. 310, p. 311 [para. 5, footnote 1].

Counsel:

Lorne Lipkus, for the plaintiff;

Exparte, no one appearing on behalf of the defendant.

Solicitors of Record:

Kestenberg Siegal Lipkus, Toronto, Ontario, for the plaintiff.

This motion was heard on December 4 and 19, 1995, and March 19, 1996, at Toronto, Ontario, before Reed, J., of the Federal Court of Canada, Trial Division, who delivered the following decision on May 29, 1996.