Flash Boys Class Actions: Civil Fraud, Conspiracy, and the Certifiability of High-frequency Trading Cases in Canada
Author | Lindsay Frame |
Pages | 9-50 |
9
Flash Boys Class Actions: Civil Fraud, Conspiracy, and
the Certifiability of High-Frequency Trading Cases in
Canada
Lindsay Frame
: The global COVID-19 pandemic has caused significant vola-
tility in global stock markets, reigniting concerns around the regulation
of high-frequency traders. High-frequency traders are electronic traders
who use algorithms to execute hundreds of trades in the time it takes to
blink an eye. Although some of these traders are harmless, others use their
speed advantage to prey on ordinary investors, generating over $5 billion
globally in increased trading costs. This article proposes that class action
law could protect investors from predatory high-frequency trading behav-
iours where regulation falls short.
Part A provides an overview of high-frequency trading, discussing
both its purported market benefits as well as its harmful effects on invest-
ors and capital market volatility. Part B discusses the problem of regula-
tors lagging behind in the complex high-frequency trading industry. It
then contends that class actions can supplement deficient enforcement
efforts, increase investor confidence in the market, compensate harmed
investors, and force high-frequency traders to internalize the costs of their
behaviour. Part C discusses two high-profile high-frequency trading class
actions in the United States. It then analyzes the doctrinal differences
between Canadian and US securities law, and applications to the certifi-
cation process. Part D concludes by suggesting that high- frequency trad-
ing class actions are ultimately a viable, although challenging, solution.
This article, therefore, proposes modest reforms to securities law — such
as modernizing the statutory offences of fraud and market manipulation
and creating private rights of action for such offences — to increase the
availability of class actions and enhance access to justice for investors in
modern capital markets.
CCAR 16-2.indb 9CCAR 16-2.indb 9 2021-01-20 2:30:44 PM2021-01-20 2:30:44 PM
CCAR 16-2.indb 10CCAR 16-2.indb 10 2021-01-20 2:30:44 PM2021-01-20 2:30:44 PM
11
FLASH BOYS CLASS ACTIONS: CIVIL
FRAUD, CONSPIRACY, AND THE
CERTIFIABILITY OF HIGH-FREQUENCY
TRADING CASES IN CANADA
Lindsay Frame*
A. HIGH-FREQUENCY TRADING: THE GOOD,
THE BAD, AND THE UGLY
1) An Overview
“The U.S. stock market was now a class system, rooted in speed, of haves and
have-nots. The haves paid for nanoseconds; the have-nots had no idea that a
nanosecond had value.” — Michael Lewis1
In 2010, a company called Spread Networks secretly constructed a fiber
optic cable connecting the New York and Chicago exchanges.2 Instead of
following railroad rights of way, the cable ran an almost perfectly straight
line between the two cities.3 Spread Networks bore holes through moun-
* Lindsay Frame, currently completing her articles at a large national firm, is an incoming
Law Clerk at the British Columbia Supreme Court (2021–22). She received her law
degree as well as her Bachelor of Science from the University of British Columbia.
“Flash Boys Class Actions” was written in the author’s final year of law school and
received the 2020 Harvey T. Strosberg essay prize. The views expressed herein are
entirely the author’s own. The author wishes to thank her professors, Luciana P
Brasil and Chelsea D Hermanson, for sharing their knowledge and experience in the
field of class actions and for their helpful comments in developing this paper.
1 Michael Lewis, Flash Boys (New York: WW Norton & Company, 2014) at 69.
2 Eric Budish, Peter Cramton, & John Shim, “The High-Frequency Trading Arms Race:
Frequent Batch Auctions as a Market Design Response” (2015) 130:4 Quarterly Journal
ofEconomics 1547 at 1548–49.
3 Christopher Steiner, “Wall Street’s Speed War” Forbes (9 September 2010), online:
www.forbes.com/forbes/2010/0927/outfront-netscape-jim-barksdale-daniel-spivey-
wall-street-speed-war.html#7b25602a741a.
CCAR 16-2.indb 11CCAR 16-2.indb 11 2021-01-20 2:30:44 PM2021-01-20 2:30:44 PM
To continue reading
Request your trial