Folahan v. Folahan, [2013] O.T.C. Uned. 2966

JurisdictionOntario
CourtSuperior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
JudgePrice, J.
Citation[2013] O.T.C. Uned. 2966,[2013] O.T.C. Uned. 2966 (SC),2013 ONSC 2966
Date30 May 2013
Subject MatterFAMILY LAW

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
18 practice notes
  • Barendregt v. Grebliunas
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court (Canada)
    • May 20, 2022
    ...BCCA 146, 348 D.L.R. (4th) 622; Ligate v. Richardson (1997), 34 O.R. (3d) 423; Young v. Young, [1993] 4 S.C.R. 3; Folahan v. Folahan, 2013 ONSC 2966; Slade v. Slade, 2002 YKSC 40; Spencer v. Spencer, 2005 ABCA 262, 257 D.L.R. (4th) 115; D.P. v. R.B., 2009 PECA 12, 285 Nfld. & P.E.I.R. 6......
  • Chapter 10: Parenting Arrangements After Divorce
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Canadian Family Law (Tenth Edition)
    • April 14, 2025
    ...creating a presumption in favour of shared parenting arrangements, equal parenting time, or regular access: Folahan v. Folahan, 2013 ONSC 2966, at para. 14 (CanLII); Slade v. Slade, 2002 YKSC 40, at para. 10 (CanLII); see also F. Kelly, “Enforcing a Parent/Child Relationship At All Cost? Su......
  • Parenting Arrangements After Divorce
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Archive Canadian Family Law. Sixth Edition
    • August 29, 2015
    ...v CS , 2014 BCPC 172 at paras 35–36; TAF v MWB , 2013 MBQB 213; HD v PED , 2012 NBQB 315; MT v MG , 2010 NSSC 89; Folahan v Folahan , 2013 ONSC 2966; RHM v CH , 2014 ONSC 521; TLMM v CAM , 2011 SKQB 326. Canadian family law 528 child is no longer in danger of physical or emotional harm. 125......
  • Court Of Appeal Summaries (May 10-14, 2021)
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • May 18, 2021
    ...Children's Law Reform Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. C.12, ss. 20(1), Family Law Rules, O. Reg. 114/99, Rules 15 and 24, Folahan v. Folahan, 2013 ONSC 2966, Rigillo v. Rigillo, 2019 ONCA 647 Short Civil Decisions 2495940 Ontario Inc. v. 2633346 Ontario Inc., 2021 ONCA 312 Keywords: Contracts, Debtor-......
  • Get Started for Free
16 cases
  • Barendregt v. Grebliunas
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court (Canada)
    • May 20, 2022
    ...BCCA 146, 348 D.L.R. (4th) 622; Ligate v. Richardson (1997), 34 O.R. (3d) 423; Young v. Young, [1993] 4 S.C.R. 3; Folahan v. Folahan, 2013 ONSC 2966; Slade v. Slade, 2002 YKSC 40; Spencer v. Spencer, 2005 ABCA 262, 257 D.L.R. (4th) 115; D.P. v. R.B., 2009 PECA 12, 285 Nfld. & P.E.I.R. 6......
  • Os v. Os
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Saskatchewan (Canada)
    • July 7, 2022
    ...creating a presumption in favour of shared parenting arrangements, equal parenting time, or regular access: Folahan v. Folahan, 2013 ONSC 2966, at para. 14 (CanLII); Slade v. Slade, 2002 YKSC 40, at para. 10 (CanLII); see also F. Kelly, “Enforcing a Parent/Child Relationship At All C......
  • Rubio v Leigh
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • November 20, 2024
    ...creating a presumption in favour of shared parenting arrangements, equal parenting time, or regular access: Folahan v. Folahan, 2013 ONSC 2966, at para. 14 (CanLII); Slade v. Slade, 2002 YKSC 40, at para. 10 (CanLII); see also F. Kelly, “Enforcing a Parent/Child Relationship At All Cost? Su......
  • 2024 BCSC 453
    • Canada
    • January 1, 2024
    ...creating a presumption in favour of shared parenting arrangements, equal parenting time, or regular access: Folahan v. Folahan, 2013 ONSC 2966, at para. 14 (CanLII); Slade v. Slade, 2002 YKSC 40, at para. 10 (CanLII); see also F. Kelly, “Enforcing a Parent/Child Relationship At All Cost? Su......
  • Get Started for Free
2 firm's commentaries
  • Court Of Appeal Summaries (May 10-14, 2021)
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • May 18, 2021
    ...Children's Law Reform Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. C.12, ss. 20(1), Family Law Rules, O. Reg. 114/99, Rules 15 and 24, Folahan v. Folahan, 2013 ONSC 2966, Rigillo v. Rigillo, 2019 ONCA 647 Short Civil Decisions 2495940 Ontario Inc. v. 2633346 Ontario Inc., 2021 ONCA 312 Keywords: Contracts, Debtor-......
  • COURT OF APPEAL SUMMARIES (MAY 10-14, 2021)
    • Canada
    • LexBlog Canada
    • May 15, 2021
    ...Children’s Law Reform Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. C.12, ss. 20(1), Family Law Rules, O. Reg. 114/99, Rules 15 and 24, Folahan v. Folahan, 2013 ONSC 2966, Rigillo v. Rigillo, 2019 ONCA 647 Short Civil Decisions 2495940 Ontario Inc. v. 2633346 Ontario Inc., 2021 ONCA 312 Keywords: Contracts, Debtor-......
2 books & journal articles
  • Parenting Arrangements After Divorce
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Archive Canadian Family Law. Sixth Edition
    • August 29, 2015
    ...v CS , 2014 BCPC 172 at paras 35–36; TAF v MWB , 2013 MBQB 213; HD v PED , 2012 NBQB 315; MT v MG , 2010 NSSC 89; Folahan v Folahan , 2013 ONSC 2966; RHM v CH , 2014 ONSC 521; TLMM v CAM , 2011 SKQB 326. Canadian family law 528 child is no longer in danger of physical or emotional harm. 125......
  • Chapter 10: Parenting Arrangements After Divorce
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Canadian Family Law (Tenth Edition)
    • April 14, 2025
    ...creating a presumption in favour of shared parenting arrangements, equal parenting time, or regular access: Folahan v. Folahan, 2013 ONSC 2966, at para. 14 (CanLII); Slade v. Slade, 2002 YKSC 40, at para. 10 (CanLII); see also F. Kelly, “Enforcing a Parent/Child Relationship At All Cost? Su......