Fontaine v. Canada (Attorney General)

JurisdictionOntario
Judgevan Rensburg and Roberts JJ.A. and Tzimas J.
Neutral Citation2021 ONCA 931
Docket NumberM52780 (C69253)
Citation2021 ONCA 931
Date31 December 2021
CourtCourt of Appeal (Ontario)

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
4 practice notes
  • Court Of Appeal Summaries (September 8 ' 12, 2025)
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • 16 Septiembre 2025
    ...Gas Distribution Inc. v. Froese, 2013 ONCA 131, Hillmount Capital Inc. v. Pizale, 2021 ONCA 364, Fontaine v. Canada (Attorney General), 2021 ONCA 931 facts: This motion arose in the context of an appeal of a decision dismissing a motion for an interlocutory injunction against the responding......
  • Fontaine v The Attorney General of Canada
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • 20 Marzo 2025
    ...Fontaine v. Canada, 2021 ONSC 4848 . A further appeal to the Court of Appeal was deemed moot: Fontaine v. Canada (Attorney General), 2021 ONCA 931, leave to appeal to SCC ref'd, 2022 CanLII 91 ISA Pitfield and an appointed amicus curiae produced reports about all St. Anne's IAP claims foll......
  • Talpade v AMJ Campbell Company Toronto East
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Ontario)
    • 9 Septiembre 2025
    ...that the interests of justice in this case do not warrant further extensions of time: see Fontaine v. Canada (Attorney General), 2021 ONCA 931, at paras. Disposition 32 For these reasons, we dismiss the motion. 33 The responding parties are entitled to costs, in the amount of $5,000, all-in......
  • 2025 ONCA 615
    • Canada
    • 1 Enero 2025
    ...that the interests of justice in this case do not warrant further extensions of time: see Fontaine v. Canada (Attorney General), 2021 ONCA 931, at paras. Disposition 32 For these reasons, we dismiss the motion. 33 The responding parties are entitled to costs, in the amount of $5,000, all-in......
3 cases
  • Fontaine v The Attorney General of Canada,
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • 20 Marzo 2025
    ...Fontaine v. Canada, 2021 ONSC 4848 . A further appeal to the Court of Appeal was deemed moot: Fontaine v. Canada (Attorney General), 2021 ONCA 931, leave to appeal to SCC ref'd, 2022 CanLII 91 ISA Pitfield and an appointed amicus curiae produced reports about all St. Anne's IAP claims foll......
  • Talpade v AMJ Campbell Company Toronto East,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Ontario)
    • 9 Septiembre 2025
    ...that the interests of justice in this case do not warrant further extensions of time: see Fontaine v. Canada (Attorney General), 2021 ONCA 931, at paras. Disposition 32 For these reasons, we dismiss the motion. 33 The responding parties are entitled to costs, in the amount of $5,000, all-in......
  • 2025 ONCA 615,
    • Canada
    • 1 Enero 2025
    ...that the interests of justice in this case do not warrant further extensions of time: see Fontaine v. Canada (Attorney General), 2021 ONCA 931, at paras. Disposition 32 For these reasons, we dismiss the motion. 33 The responding parties are entitled to costs, in the amount of $5,000, all-in......
1 firm's commentaries
  • Court Of Appeal Summaries (September 8 ' 12, 2025)
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • 16 Septiembre 2025
    ...Gas Distribution Inc. v. Froese, 2013 ONCA 131, Hillmount Capital Inc. v. Pizale, 2021 ONCA 364, Fontaine v. Canada (Attorney General), 2021 ONCA 931 facts: This motion arose in the context of an appeal of a decision dismissing a motion for an interlocutory injunction against the responding......