Forensic Experts in the Criminal Justice System

AuthorCaitlin Pakosh
Pages10-22
10
CHAPTER 2
Forensic Experts in the Criminal
Justice System*
Caitlin Pakosh
* Written by Caitlin Pakosh, this chapter is intended to ref‌lect the content of the collab-
orative discussion mentioned in section A. Meeting minutes were taken by Katherine
Linton, Juris Doctor (J.D.) candidate at the Bora Laskin Faculty of Law at Lakehead
University. The space for the meeting was kindly provided by Innocence Canada.
A. INTRODUCTION
On 17 June 2015, a collaborative discussion among the contributors of this
book took place to address the use of forensic experts in the criminal jus-
tice system. Contributors who could not attend the discussion provided
their thoughts to the editor either over the phone or in writing.
Four primary issues were discussed: (1) identifying and retaining a
“good” expert; (2) ensuring ef‌fective communication in the lawyer-expert
relationship; (3) ensuring counsel and the court understand and correct-
ly interpret the expert evidence; and (4) developing recommendations to
improve collaboration between the scientif‌ic and legal communities.
B. DISCUSSION
1) Identifying and Retaining a “Good” Expert
a) What Is a “Good” Expert?
Defence and prosecution strategies may inf‌luence what each side consid-
ers to be a “good” expert since the expert that each side wants is the one

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT