Formosa v. Persaud
| Jurisdiction | Ontario |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Ontario) |
| Judge | Pepall, Hourigan and Roberts JJ.A. |
| Citation | 2020 ONCA 368 |
| Docket Number | C67456 |
| Date | 11 June 2020 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
5 practice notes
-
Court Of Appeal Summaries (September 8 ' 12, 2025)
...Civil Procedure, Summary Judgment, Evidence, Expert Evidence, Foreign Law, Krawchuk v. Scherbak, 2011 ONCA 352, Formosa v. Persaud, 2020 ONCA 368 facts: The appellant, S.G., brought a wrongful dismissal action against Cambridge Mercantile Corp. ("Cambridge"), claiming, among other things, u......
-
Gayle v Cambridge Mercantile Corporation
...352 at para 130, leave to appeal refused, [2011] SCCA No 319; Kramer at para 404; Formosa v. Persaud, 2019 ONSC 4860 at para 65, affirmed 2020 ONCA 368. In a solicitor's negligence case, a claimant must generally lead expert evidence to show the standard of care and a breach of that standar......
-
Gayle v Cambridge Mercantile Corporation
...v. Scherbak, 2011 ONCA 352, 106 O.R. (3d) 598, at paras. 130–135, leave to appeal refused, [2011] S.C.C.A. No. 319; Formosa v. Persaud, 2020 ONCA 368, at para. 10. The extensive evidentiary record put forward by the respondents in this case allowed them to show, and the motion judge to find......
-
OZ Optics Ltd. v. Evans
...the facts on this particular issue.  See McPeake v. Cadesky & Associates, 2018 ONCA 554 at paras. 13-15 and Formosa v. Persaud, 2020 ONCA 368 at para. b.         Internal e-mails [131]       In my view, the e-mai......
Get Started for Free
5 cases
-
Gayle v. Cambridge Mercantile Corp
...352 at para 130, leave to appeal refused, [2011] SCCA No 319; Kramer at para 404; Formosa v. Persaud, 2019 ONSC 4860 at para 65, affirmed 2020 ONCA 368. In a solicitor’s negligence case, a claimant must generally lead expert evidence to show the standard of care and a breach of that standar......
-
Blizzard Uranium Corporation v Nathanson, Schacter & Thompson LLP
...may make minor errors or errors in judgment that cause unfortunate results, without breaching the standard of care: Formosa v. Persaud, 2020 ONCA 368 at para. 325 However, I find that the making of the Error here was negligent. With the assistance of the experts' opinions discussed below, I......
-
OZ Optics Ltd. v. Evans
...of the facts on this particular issue. See McPeake v. Cadesky & Associates, 2018 ONCA 554 at paras. 13-15 and Formosa v. Persaud, 2020 ONCA 368 at para. b. Internal e-mails [131] In my view, the e-mails exchanged by the Defendants and the other members of the legal department, including......
-
Gayle v. Cambridge Mercantile Corp.
...v. Scherbak, 2011 ONCA 352, 106 O.R. (3d) 598, at paras. 130-135, leave to appeal refused, [2011] S.C.C.A. No. 319; Formosa v. Persaud, 2020 ONCA 368, at para. 10. The extensive evidentiary record put forward by the respondents in this case allowed them to show, and the motion judge to find......
Get Started for Free
1 firm's commentaries
-
Court Of Appeal Summaries (September 8 ' 12, 2025)
...Civil Procedure, Summary Judgment, Evidence, Expert Evidence, Foreign Law, Krawchuk v. Scherbak, 2011 ONCA 352, Formosa v. Persaud, 2020 ONCA 368 facts: The appellant, S.G., brought a wrongful dismissal action against Cambridge Mercantile Corp. ("Cambridge"), claiming, among other things, u......
