Fortinet Technologies (Canada) ULC v. Bell Canada, 2018 BCCA 277

JudgeThe Honourable Mr. Justice Frankel; The Honourable Mr. Justice Groberman; The Honourable Madam Justice Garson
CourtCourt of Appeal (British Columbia)
Case DateJuly 06, 2018
JurisdictionBritish Columbia
Citations2018 BCCA 277
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
10 practice notes
  • Mee Hoi Bros. Company Ltd. v. Borving Investments (Canada) Ltd., 2020 BCSC 1999
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • December 16, 2020
    ...intended the LPA to apply. [104]    Fourth, citing authority such as Fortinet Technologies (Canada) ULC v. Bell Canada, 2018 BCCA 277 at paras. 21–25, Doman Forest Products Limited v. GMAC Commercial Credit Corporation – Canada, 2005 BCSC 774 at para. 194, and T......
  • Johnston v. Octaform Inc.,
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • March 26, 2021
    ...Medallion Realty Ltd., 2012 BCCA 247, Este v. Esteghamat-Ardakani, 2018 BCCA 290, and Fortinet Technologies (Canada) ULC v.Bell Canada, 2018 BCCA 277. Arbitrator’s Reasons [98] The Arbitrator acknowledged that Octaform had indeed taken contrary positions, albeit in two separate proceedings ......
  • Kingsgate Property Ltd. v. Vancouver School District No. 39,
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • April 12, 2023
    ...Life Insurance Company v. Parc-IX Limited, 2018 ONSC 3625 at para. 43; see also Fortinet Technologies (Canada) ULC v. Bell Canada, 2018 BCCA 277 at paras. 27–35; Danyluk at para. 21 (application of the doctrines to judicial or quasi-judicial decisions pronounced by adm......
  • 2023 BCSC 560,
    • Canada
    • January 1, 2023
    ...Life Insurance Company v. Parc-IX Limited, 2018 ONSC 3625 at para. 43; see also Fortinet Technologies (Canada) ULC v. Bell Canada, 2018 BCCA 277 at paras. 27–35; Danyluk at para. 21 (application of the doctrines to judicial or quasi-judicial decisions pronounced by administrative off......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
10 cases
  • Mee Hoi Bros. Company Ltd. v. Borving Investments (Canada) Ltd., 2020 BCSC 1999
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • December 16, 2020
    ...intended the LPA to apply. [104]    Fourth, citing authority such as Fortinet Technologies (Canada) ULC v. Bell Canada, 2018 BCCA 277 at paras. 21–25, Doman Forest Products Limited v. GMAC Commercial Credit Corporation – Canada, 2005 BCSC 774 at para. 194, and T......
  • Johnston v. Octaform Inc.,
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • March 26, 2021
    ...Medallion Realty Ltd., 2012 BCCA 247, Este v. Esteghamat-Ardakani, 2018 BCCA 290, and Fortinet Technologies (Canada) ULC v.Bell Canada, 2018 BCCA 277. Arbitrator’s Reasons [98] The Arbitrator acknowledged that Octaform had indeed taken contrary positions, albeit in two separate proceedings ......
  • Kingsgate Property Ltd. v. Vancouver School District No. 39,
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • April 12, 2023
    ...Life Insurance Company v. Parc-IX Limited, 2018 ONSC 3625 at para. 43; see also Fortinet Technologies (Canada) ULC v. Bell Canada, 2018 BCCA 277 at paras. 27–35; Danyluk at para. 21 (application of the doctrines to judicial or quasi-judicial decisions pronounced by adm......
  • 2023 BCSC 560,
    • Canada
    • January 1, 2023
    ...Life Insurance Company v. Parc-IX Limited, 2018 ONSC 3625 at para. 43; see also Fortinet Technologies (Canada) ULC v. Bell Canada, 2018 BCCA 277 at paras. 27–35; Danyluk at para. 21 (application of the doctrines to judicial or quasi-judicial decisions pronounced by administrative off......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT