FortisAlberta Inc v Alberta (Utilities Commission), 2020 ABCA 271
| Judge | Honourable Mr. Justice Jack Watson |
| Citation | 2020 ABCA 271 |
| Date | 21 July 2020 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Alberta) |
| Docket Number | 2001-0098-AC |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
9 practice notes
-
Sedgwick v Edmonton Real Estate Board Co-Operative Listing Bureau Limited (Realtors Association of Edmonton),
...any further assistance, the correctness of [the Board’s] . . . decision”); FortisAlberta v Alberta (Utilities Commission), 2020 ABCA 271 at paras 77-79, [2020] AJ No 769 (QL), referring to Ontario (Energy Board) v Ontario Power Generation Inc., 2015 SCC 44 at para 64-69, [2015......
-
Equs Rea Ltd v Alberta (Utilities Commission),
...14, 2020. Factum of the Respondent Alberta Utilities Commission (0222AC), Tab 1. [72] FortisAlberta Inc. v. Alberta Util. Comm’n, 2020 ABCA 271 [73] Factum of the Appellant, Equs Rea Ltd. (0219AC), ¶ 15 (“The parties did not reach an agreement on a cost allocation model a......
-
WCSB Power Alberta Limited Partnership v Alberta Utilities Commission,
...and service scheme should be read harmoniously so that they all work as intended: FortisAlberta Inc v Alberta (Utilities Commission), 2020 ABCA 271 at para 53, [2020] AJ No 769 53 No one disputes that different pieces of legislation forming part of a complex regulatory and......
-
Equs Rea Ltd v Alberta (Utilities Commission),
...May 14, 2020. Factum of the Respondent Alberta Utilities Commission (0222AC), Tab 1. 72 FortisAlberta Inc. v. Alberta Util. Comm'n, 2020 ABCA 271 73 Factum of the Appellant, Equs Rea Ltd. (0219AC), ¶ 15 (“The parties did not reach an agreement on a cost allocation model aft......
Request a trial to view additional results
9 cases
-
Sedgwick v Edmonton Real Estate Board Co-Operative Listing Bureau Limited (Realtors Association of Edmonton),
...any further assistance, the correctness of [the Board’s] . . . decision”); FortisAlberta v Alberta (Utilities Commission), 2020 ABCA 271 at paras 77-79, [2020] AJ No 769 (QL), referring to Ontario (Energy Board) v Ontario Power Generation Inc., 2015 SCC 44 at para 64-69, [2015......
-
Equs Rea Ltd v Alberta (Utilities Commission),
...14, 2020. Factum of the Respondent Alberta Utilities Commission (0222AC), Tab 1. [72] FortisAlberta Inc. v. Alberta Util. Comm’n, 2020 ABCA 271 [73] Factum of the Appellant, Equs Rea Ltd. (0219AC), ¶ 15 (“The parties did not reach an agreement on a cost allocation model a......
-
Equs Rea Ltd v Alberta (Utilities Commission),
...May 14, 2020. Factum of the Respondent Alberta Utilities Commission (0222AC), Tab 1. 72 FortisAlberta Inc. v. Alberta Util. Comm'n, 2020 ABCA 271 73 Factum of the Appellant, Equs Rea Ltd. (0219AC), ¶ 15 (“The parties did not reach an agreement on a cost allocation model aft......
-
WCSB Power Alberta Limited Partnership v Alberta Utilities Commission,
...and service scheme should be read harmoniously so that they all work as intended: FortisAlberta Inc v Alberta (Utilities Commission), 2020 ABCA 271 at para 53, [2020] AJ No 769 53 No one disputes that different pieces of legislation forming part of a complex regulatory and......
Request a trial to view additional results