Fulop v. Corrigan, 2020 ONSC 1648

JurisdictionOntario
JudgePERELL
Citation2020 ONSC 1648
CourtSuperior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
Date20 March 2020
Docket NumberCV-11-423910
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
7 practice notes
  • Algarawi v. Berger; and Porter v. Sutandar,
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • 17 Abril 2023
    ...[1994] 2 S.C.R. 9 at para. 22. [9] Bee Vectoring Technology Inc. v. Chitiz Pathak LLP, 2019 ONSC 1714, at para. 74; Fulop v. Corrigan, 2020 ONSC 1648 at para. 74; Leadbeater v. Ontario (2004), 70 O.R. (3d) 224 (S.C.J.), at para. [10] R. v. White, 2011 SCC 13, [2011] 1 S.C.R. 433, at para. 3......
  • Farid v. Brunt,
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • 29 Septiembre 2022
    ...The test to be applied when considering granting leave is set out in Fulop v. Corrigan, 2020 ONSC 1648, [2020] O.J. No. 1227 at para 77 (S.C.J.), as           i.             what the par......
  • Providence Grace Inc. v. Yardistry Ltd.,
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • 5 Julio 2022
    ...and guided by the overriding interests of justice to determine whether it is just that the order be made. See also Fulop v. Corrigan, 2020 ONSC 1648 at para. 3.         Application to this case a.         The As......
  • Aragon Investments Ltd. v. Moloney Electric Inc.,
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • 7 Junio 2021
    ...[7]           All parties rely on the decision of Perell, J. Fulop v Corrigan 2020 ONSC 1648 on the test for leave.  In upholding the decision of Master McGraw to grant leave to bring a motion for security for costs, Perell, J. noted th......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
7 cases
  • Algarawi v. Berger; and Porter v. Sutandar,
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • 17 Abril 2023
    ...[1994] 2 S.C.R. 9 at para. 22. [9] Bee Vectoring Technology Inc. v. Chitiz Pathak LLP, 2019 ONSC 1714, at para. 74; Fulop v. Corrigan, 2020 ONSC 1648 at para. 74; Leadbeater v. Ontario (2004), 70 O.R. (3d) 224 (S.C.J.), at para. [10] R. v. White, 2011 SCC 13, [2011] 1 S.C.R. 433, at para. 3......
  • Farid v. Brunt,
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • 29 Septiembre 2022
    ...The test to be applied when considering granting leave is set out in Fulop v. Corrigan, 2020 ONSC 1648, [2020] O.J. No. 1227 at para 77 (S.C.J.), as           i.             what the par......
  • Providence Grace Inc. v. Yardistry Ltd.,
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • 5 Julio 2022
    ...and guided by the overriding interests of justice to determine whether it is just that the order be made. See also Fulop v. Corrigan, 2020 ONSC 1648 at para. 3.         Application to this case a.         The As......
  • Aragon Investments Ltd. v. Moloney Electric Inc.,
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • 7 Junio 2021
    ...[7]           All parties rely on the decision of Perell, J. Fulop v Corrigan 2020 ONSC 1648 on the test for leave.  In upholding the decision of Master McGraw to grant leave to bring a motion for security for costs, Perell, J. noted th......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT