Fulop v. Corrigan,
| Jurisdiction | Ontario |
| Judge | PERELL |
| Citation | 2020 ONSC 1648 |
| Date | 20 March 2020 |
| Court | Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada) |
| Docket Number | CV-11-423910 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
14 practice notes
-
Algarawi v. Berger; and Porter v. Sutandar,
...[1994] 2 S.C.R. 9 at para. 22. [9] Bee Vectoring Technology Inc. v. Chitiz Pathak LLP, 2019 ONSC 1714, at para. 74; Fulop v. Corrigan, 2020 ONSC 1648 at para. 74; Leadbeater v. Ontario (2004), 70 O.R. (3d) 224 (S.C.J.), at para. [10] R. v. White, 2011 SCC 13, [2011] 1 S.C.R. 433, at para. 3......
-
Paunovski v Risteski et Al,
...[ sic] should not benefit from the same.” 18 The approach to leave under r. 48.04 was set out by Perell J. in Fulop v. Corrigan, 2020 ONSC 1648: [76] Once a party has set an action down for trial, it is a matter of discretion in the particular circumstances of the case whether the court wil......
-
Farid v. Brunt,
...The test to be applied when considering granting leave is set out in Fulop v. Corrigan, 2020 ONSC 1648, [2020] O.J. No. 1227 at para 77 (S.C.J.), as i. what the par......
-
Global Fuels Inc. v Econo Petroleum Inc.,
...80, [1994] 2 S.C.R. 9 at para. 22. 4 Bee Vectoring Technology Inc. v. Chitiz Pathak LLP, 2019 ONSC 1714, at para. 74; Fulop v. Corrigan, 2020 ONSC 1648 at para. 74; Leadbeater v. Ontario (2004), 70 O.R. (3d) 224 (S.C.J.), at para. 1994 SCC 80, [1994] 2 S.C.R. 9 at para. 22. 4 Bee Vectorin......
Get Started for Free
12 cases
-
Algarawi v. Berger; and Porter v. Sutandar,
...[1994] 2 S.C.R. 9 at para. 22. [9] Bee Vectoring Technology Inc. v. Chitiz Pathak LLP, 2019 ONSC 1714, at para. 74; Fulop v. Corrigan, 2020 ONSC 1648 at para. 74; Leadbeater v. Ontario (2004), 70 O.R. (3d) 224 (S.C.J.), at para. [10] R. v. White, 2011 SCC 13, [2011] 1 S.C.R. 433, at para. 3......
-
Farid v. Brunt,
...The test to be applied when considering granting leave is set out in Fulop v. Corrigan, 2020 ONSC 1648, [2020] O.J. No. 1227 at para 77 (S.C.J.), as i. what the par......
-
Global Fuels Inc. v Econo Petroleum Inc.,
...80, [1994] 2 S.C.R. 9 at para. 22. 4 Bee Vectoring Technology Inc. v. Chitiz Pathak LLP, 2019 ONSC 1714, at para. 74; Fulop v. Corrigan, 2020 ONSC 1648 at para. 74; Leadbeater v. Ontario (2004), 70 O.R. (3d) 224 (S.C.J.), at para. 1994 SCC 80, [1994] 2 S.C.R. 9 at para. 22. 4 Bee Vectorin......
-
Providence Grace Inc. v. Yardistry Ltd.,
...and guided by the overriding interests of justice to determine whether it is just that the order be made. See also Fulop v. Corrigan, 2020 ONSC 1648 at para. 3. Application to this case a. The As......
Get Started for Free