Gabbs v. Bouwhuis, 2007 BCSC 887

JurisdictionBritish Columbia
JudgeMasuhara, J.
CourtSupreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
Citation2007 BCSC 887,[2007] B.C.T.C. Uned. D48
Date20 June 2007
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
4 practice notes
  • Canada v. Kilback Stock Farm Ltd., 2020 FC 981
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • 19 Octubre 2020
    ...actively participated in them. This is not a situation where the guarantor was an arm’s length third party (see Gabbs v Bouwhuis, 2007 BCSC 887 at paras 58-70). [79]  The only evidence filed by the Defendants in response to this motion for summary judgment is the affidavit of Al......
  • Canadian Mortgage Servicing Corporation v. Korf,
    • Canada
    • Court of King's Bench of Saskatchewan (Canada)
    • 6 Febrero 2023
    ...actively participated in them. This is not a situation where the guarantor was an arm’s length third party (see Gabbs v Bouwhuis, 2007 BCSC 887 at However, that discussion related to whether the guarantors were discharged by the amendments to terms for the principal debt, not to whet......
  • PAVEMENT SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL INC. v. CITY OF SASKATOON, 2019 SKQB 254
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Saskatchewan (Canada)
    • 27 Septiembre 2019
    ...That approach has been followed in Gabbs v Bouwhuis, 2007 BCSC 887, and Xerox Canada Ltd. v Vandesign Graphix Ltd., 2010 BCSC [52]                           ......
  • Xerox Canada Ltd. v. Vandesign Graphix Ltd. et al., [2010] B.C.T.C. Uned. 1039 (SC)
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • 23 Julio 2010
    ...or both. (Emphasis added.) Relying on Laurentian Bank of Canada , Justice Masuhara reached a similar conclusion in Gabbs v. Bouwhuis , 2007 BCSC 887 at para. 53. [32] Since the signature line in the Lease references a corporate entity, the question is whether the Lease and the surrounding c......
4 cases
  • Canada v. Kilback Stock Farm Ltd., 2020 FC 981
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • 19 Octubre 2020
    ...actively participated in them. This is not a situation where the guarantor was an arm’s length third party (see Gabbs v Bouwhuis, 2007 BCSC 887 at paras 58-70). [79]  The only evidence filed by the Defendants in response to this motion for summary judgment is the affidavit of Al......
  • Canadian Mortgage Servicing Corporation v. Korf,
    • Canada
    • Court of King's Bench of Saskatchewan (Canada)
    • 6 Febrero 2023
    ...actively participated in them. This is not a situation where the guarantor was an arm’s length third party (see Gabbs v Bouwhuis, 2007 BCSC 887 at However, that discussion related to whether the guarantors were discharged by the amendments to terms for the principal debt, not to whet......
  • PAVEMENT SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL INC. v. CITY OF SASKATOON, 2019 SKQB 254
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Saskatchewan (Canada)
    • 27 Septiembre 2019
    ...That approach has been followed in Gabbs v Bouwhuis, 2007 BCSC 887, and Xerox Canada Ltd. v Vandesign Graphix Ltd., 2010 BCSC [52]                           ......
  • Xerox Canada Ltd. v. Vandesign Graphix Ltd. et al., [2010] B.C.T.C. Uned. 1039 (SC)
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • 23 Julio 2010
    ...or both. (Emphasis added.) Relying on Laurentian Bank of Canada , Justice Masuhara reached a similar conclusion in Gabbs v. Bouwhuis , 2007 BCSC 887 at para. 53. [32] Since the signature line in the Lease references a corporate entity, the question is whether the Lease and the surrounding c......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT