DESBIENS v. WARKEN, 2020 SKQB 145

JurisdictionSaskatchewan
JudgeTOCHOR J.
Citation2020 SKQB 145
Date15 May 2020
CourtCourt of Queen's Bench of Saskatchewan (Canada)
Docket NumberQBG 152 of 2015
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
4 practice notes
  • Swift River Farms Ltd. v Pillar Capital Corp.,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan)
    • 4 Agosto 2022
    ...85 Sask R 192 (QB) at para 7; Royal Trust Company v E.M. Jones, [1962] SCR 132 (WL) at 143–146; and Desbiens v Warken, 2020 SKQB 145 at paras 13–17, 61 CPC (8th) 187. While an error of law may be relevant in determining if there are special circumstances of this kind......
  • SASKATCHEWAN GOVERNMENT INSURANCE v. RABB,
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Saskatchewan (Canada)
    • 26 Julio 2021
    ...Recently, Tochor J. in Desbiens v Warken, 2020 SKQB 145 at paras 18-27 and 30 [Desbiens], extensively reviewed the principles relevant to applications brought to set aside a default judgment pursuant to Rule 10-13. As I cannot improve on his summary, I reproduce these paragraphs in their en......
  • Anderson Law Firm Prof. Corp. v. Duckworth,
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Saskatchewan (Canada)
    • 28 Julio 2022
    ...Justice Tochor, in Desbiens v Warken, 2020 SKQB 145, after a thorough canvasing of the case law, succinctly distilled four essential issues that arise in an application akin to Mr. Duckworth’s application. Set in context of this application, I must address these four questions to det......
  • Czerwonka v Williams,
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Saskatchewan (Canada)
    • 13 Septiembre 2022
    ...Justice Tochor, in Desbiens v Warken, 2020 SKQB 145 at paras 18‑27 and 30, 61 CPC (8th) 187, outlines the principles a court will consider in exercising its discretion to set aside a judgment under Rule 10‑13. [11]         ......
4 cases
  • Swift River Farms Ltd. v Pillar Capital Corp.,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan)
    • 4 Agosto 2022
    ...85 Sask R 192 (QB) at para 7; Royal Trust Company v E.M. Jones, [1962] SCR 132 (WL) at 143–146; and Desbiens v Warken, 2020 SKQB 145 at paras 13–17, 61 CPC (8th) 187. While an error of law may be relevant in determining if there are special circumstances of this kind......
  • SASKATCHEWAN GOVERNMENT INSURANCE v. RABB,
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Saskatchewan (Canada)
    • 26 Julio 2021
    ...Recently, Tochor J. in Desbiens v Warken, 2020 SKQB 145 at paras 18-27 and 30 [Desbiens], extensively reviewed the principles relevant to applications brought to set aside a default judgment pursuant to Rule 10-13. As I cannot improve on his summary, I reproduce these paragraphs in their en......
  • Anderson Law Firm Prof. Corp. v. Duckworth,
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Saskatchewan (Canada)
    • 28 Julio 2022
    ...Justice Tochor, in Desbiens v Warken, 2020 SKQB 145, after a thorough canvasing of the case law, succinctly distilled four essential issues that arise in an application akin to Mr. Duckworth’s application. Set in context of this application, I must address these four questions to det......
  • Czerwonka v Williams,
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Saskatchewan (Canada)
    • 13 Septiembre 2022
    ...Justice Tochor, in Desbiens v Warken, 2020 SKQB 145 at paras 18‑27 and 30, 61 CPC (8th) 187, outlines the principles a court will consider in exercising its discretion to set aside a judgment under Rule 10‑13. [11]         ......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT