Gagne et al. v. Sharpe et al., [2015] B.C.T.C. Uned. 154
| Judge | MacKenzie, J. |
| Court | Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada) |
| Case Date | February 05, 2015 |
| Jurisdiction | British Columbia |
| Citations | [2015] B.C.T.C. Uned. 154;2015 BCSC 154;[2015] B.C.T.C. Uned. 154 (SC) |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
9 practice notes
-
M.A. Concrete Ltd. v. Truter et al., 2015 BCSC 829
...decisions in Taylor v. Hoskin , 2006 BCCA 39; 116531 Canada Inc. v. 569562 Ontario Inc., 1995 CarswellOnt 3750 (ONCJ); Gagne v. Sharpe , 2015 BCSC 154, which cites Vazzaz v. Vazzaz , 2006 BCSC 1146, which in turn cites Fotheringham v. Fotheringham , 2001 BCSC 1321; Grape Expectations Wine E......
-
Can-West Development Ltd. v. Parmar, 2020 BCSC 439
...meticulous mathematical examination of the matters in dispute: Fotheringham v. Fotheringham, 2001 BCSC 1321 at para. 45; Gagne v. Sharpe, 2015 BCSC 154 at paras. 22 and 34. As stated in Gichuru at para. 13, the court ought [13] … 1. Focus on the matters in dispute, which may or may not incl......
-
Sew Cozzi Ventures Inc. v. Apex Outdoor Innovations Corp., 2017 BCSC 2228
... The relevant considerations in the determination of success were discussed in Gagne v. Sharpe, 2015 BCSC 154 as follows at para. 22:… Success for costs purposes has been defined as substantial success: Vazzaz v. Vazzaz, 2006 BCSC 1146. In Vazzaz......
-
Leaf v. Langley (Township), 2018 BCSC 2265
...then bear their own costs. [12] In his discussion about substantial success in Gagne v. Sharpe, 2015 BCSC 154 [Gagne], MacKenzie J. addressed the specific problem of judicial review proceedings involving multiple issues. He said at [26] &#......
Request a trial to view additional results
6 cases
-
M.A. Concrete Ltd. v. Truter et al., 2015 BCSC 829
...decisions in Taylor v. Hoskin , 2006 BCCA 39; 116531 Canada Inc. v. 569562 Ontario Inc., 1995 CarswellOnt 3750 (ONCJ); Gagne v. Sharpe , 2015 BCSC 154, which cites Vazzaz v. Vazzaz , 2006 BCSC 1146, which in turn cites Fotheringham v. Fotheringham , 2001 BCSC 1321; Grape Expectations Wine E......
-
Can-West Development Ltd. v. Parmar, 2020 BCSC 439
...meticulous mathematical examination of the matters in dispute: Fotheringham v. Fotheringham, 2001 BCSC 1321 at para. 45; Gagne v. Sharpe, 2015 BCSC 154 at paras. 22 and 34. As stated in Gichuru at para. 13, the court ought [13] … 1. Focus on the matters in dispute, which may or may not incl......
-
Sew Cozzi Ventures Inc. v. Apex Outdoor Innovations Corp., 2017 BCSC 2228
... The relevant considerations in the determination of success were discussed in Gagne v. Sharpe, 2015 BCSC 154 as follows at para. 22:… Success for costs purposes has been defined as substantial success: Vazzaz v. Vazzaz, 2006 BCSC 1146. In Vazzaz......
-
Leaf v. Langley (Township), 2018 BCSC 2265
...then bear their own costs. [12] In his discussion about substantial success in Gagne v. Sharpe, 2015 BCSC 154 [Gagne], MacKenzie J. addressed the specific problem of judicial review proceedings involving multiple issues. He said at [26] &#......
Request a trial to view additional results
3 firm's commentaries
-
Private Parties Not Liable For Public Interest Costs
...the burden on the petitioners was even higher than the already high burden under the Adams test. The Decision In reasons indexed at 2015 BCSC 154, Mr. Justice MacKenzie of the British Columbia Supreme Court rejected the petitioners application for costs against Rio First, and decisively, th......
-
Private Parties Not Liable For Public Interest Costs
...the burden on the petitioners was even higher than the already high burden under the Adams test. The Decision In reasons indexed at 2015 BCSC 154, Mr. Justice MacKenzie of the British Columbia Supreme Court rejected the petitioners application for costs against Rio First, and decisively, th......
-
Red Chris Development Company Ltd. V. Quock, 2015 BCSC 589
...did not rise to the level of "reprehensible" and general costs would be a sufficient deterrent. To a similar effect, see Gagne v. Sharpe, 2015 BCSC 154, where the Court confirmed that private parties will only be made to bear special costs in public interest litigation in very exceptional T......