Garcia v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 16
| Court | Federal Court (Canada) |
| Case Date | January 09, 2020 |
| Jurisdiction | Canada (Federal) |
| Citations | 2020 FC 16 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
2 practice notes
-
Nyabuzana v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2021 FC 1484
...at para 55; Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) v Khosa, 2009 SCC 12 at paras 61, 64; Garcia v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 16 at para 16). In particular, considerable deference is owed to the weight given to the assessment of H&C factors made by an officer (Wang v Can......
-
Gao v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration),
...should not interfere with a decision maker’s factual findings: Vavilov at para 125; Garcia v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 16 at paras 16-17. Ms. Gao has not established that the RAD erred in its assessment of the support letter. V. [24] In my view, the RAD’s d......
2 cases
-
Nyabuzana v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2021 FC 1484
...at para 55; Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) v Khosa, 2009 SCC 12 at paras 61, 64; Garcia v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 16 at para 16). In particular, considerable deference is owed to the weight given to the assessment of H&C factors made by an officer (Wang v Can......
-
Gao v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration),
...should not interfere with a decision maker’s factual findings: Vavilov at para 125; Garcia v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 16 at paras 16-17. Ms. Gao has not established that the RAD erred in its assessment of the support letter. V. [24] In my view, the RAD’s d......