Gaukel v. Buksh,
| Jurisdiction | British Columbia |
| Judge | Honourable Madam Justice Norell |
| Neutral Citation | 2021 BCSC 1751 |
| Citation | 2021 BCSC 1751 |
| Court | Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada) |
| Docket Number | 215920 |
| Date | 02 September 2021 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
4 practice notes
-
Wang v Liu,
...is balanced with the reality of transactional negotiations, particularly once the agreement has become operational: Gaukel v. Buksh, 2021 BCSC 1751 at para. 88 When the alleged contract is oral, the court must consider what the parties said and did, and assess objectively whether, in the co......
-
2023 BCSC 972,
...is balanced with the reality of transactional negotiations, particularly once the agreement has become operational: Gaukel v. Buksh, 2021 BCSC 1751 at para. 88 When the alleged contract is oral, the court must consider what the parties said and did, and assess objectively whether, in the co......
-
2024 BCSC 367,
...whether an objective reasonable bystander would have considered the parties to have agreed to establish a partnership: Gaukel v. Buksh, 2021 BCSC 1751 at para. 178. When the alleged agreement is oral, the court objectively assesses what the parties did and said, in context, to determine whe......
-
DeFrancesco v Balla,
...whether an objective reasonable bystander would have considered the parties to have agreed to establish a partnership: Gaukel v. Buksh, 2021 BCSC 1751 at para. 178. When the alleged agreement is oral, the court objectively assesses what the parties did and said, in context, to determine whe......
4 cases
-
Wang v Liu,
...is balanced with the reality of transactional negotiations, particularly once the agreement has become operational: Gaukel v. Buksh, 2021 BCSC 1751 at para. 88 When the alleged contract is oral, the court must consider what the parties said and did, and assess objectively whether, in the co......
-
2023 BCSC 972,
...is balanced with the reality of transactional negotiations, particularly once the agreement has become operational: Gaukel v. Buksh, 2021 BCSC 1751 at para. 88 When the alleged contract is oral, the court must consider what the parties said and did, and assess objectively whether, in the co......
-
2024 BCSC 367,
...whether an objective reasonable bystander would have considered the parties to have agreed to establish a partnership: Gaukel v. Buksh, 2021 BCSC 1751 at para. 178. When the alleged agreement is oral, the court objectively assesses what the parties did and said, in context, to determine whe......
-
DeFrancesco v Balla,
...whether an objective reasonable bystander would have considered the parties to have agreed to establish a partnership: Gaukel v. Buksh, 2021 BCSC 1751 at para. 178. When the alleged agreement is oral, the court objectively assesses what the parties did and said, in context, to determine whe......