Geldart v. Workers' Compensation Board (N.S.), (1996) 155 N.S.R.(2d) 51 (CA)
Judge | Freeman, Roscoe and Bateman, JJ.A. |
Court | Court of Appeal of Nova Scotia (Canada) |
Case Date | October 07, 1996 |
Jurisdiction | Nova Scotia |
Citations | (1996), 155 N.S.R.(2d) 51 (CA) |
Geldart v. WCB (1996), 155 N.S.R.(2d) 51 (CA);
457 A.P.R. 51
MLB headnote and full text
Willa Geldart (appellant) v. The Workers' Compensation Board of Nova Scotia (respondent)
(C.A. No. 126571)
Indexed As: Geldart v. Workers' Compensation Board (N.S.)
Nova Scotia Court of Appeal
Freeman, Roscoe and Bateman, JJ.A.
October 31, 1996.
Summary:
Geldart, a cleaner, injured her back carrying large pails of water. She applied for worker's compensation benefits. She received temporary total disability benefits until June 1992. She successfully applied for an extension of benefits. In September 1993, a medical assessment confirmed that she suffered from chronic pain syndrome. In March 1995, she was denied a permanent partial disability award. An appeal to a Review Officer, Workers' Compensation Board, was dismissed. A further appeal concluded that she was not entitled to permanent medical impairment benefits. She appealed. The Workers' Compensation Board applied to quash the appeal, because, inter alia, Geldart failed to apply for leave and the appeal was moot. The Board also argued that Charter issues raised by Geldart were not properly before the Board.
The Nova Scotia Court of Appeal granted leave to appeal, ordered trial of the issues raised in the first ground of appeal and struck out the Charter issues raised by Geldart.
Administrative Law - Topic 6126
Judicial review - Statutory appeal - Leave to appeal - When available - The applicant sought to appeal a negative decision of the Workers' Compensation Board - The Board submitted that the applicant was required to apply for leave to appeal - The Nova Scotia Court of Appeal stated that "[t]he test that should be applied on an application for leave is well established to be whether the applicant has shown that a substantial question of law or jurisdiction exists that established that there is a reasonably arguable case for success on the appeal" - See paragraph 9.
Workers' Compensation - Topic 5605
Compensation - Compensable injuries and disabilities - Permanent total or partial disability - Geldart, a cleaner, injured her back carrying large pails of water - A medical assessment confirmed that she suffered from chronic pain syndrome - A hearing officer applied the Workers' Compensation Board Guidelines and denied her permanent partial disability benefits - She appealed under s. 183 on the ground that the Guidelines were ultra vires the Workers' Compensation Act because they required objective findings of abnormalities which precluded a person with chronic pain syndrome from receiving a permanent partial disability award - The Nova Scotia Court of Appeal found that there was an arguable issue that should be determined at trial - See paragraphs 10 to 16.
Workers' Compensation - Topic 7002
Practice - Appeals - Review of board's decision by an appeal board or by the courts - Jurisdiction - Geldart, a cleaner, injured her back carrying large pails of water - A medical assessment confirmed that she suffered from chronic pain syndrome - A hearing officer applied the Workers' Compensation Board Guidelines and denied her permanent partial disability benefits - Geldart appealed on the grounds that (1) under s. 183, the policy guidelines were ultra vires the Workers' Compensation Act, and (2) the Board discriminated against Geldart contrary to the Charter, s. 15 - The Nova Scotia Court of Appeal found an arguable issue and granted leave to appeal on the first ground - The court struck the Charter appeal, because Geldart had not exhausted all avenues of appeal under the Act (i.e., an appeal to the Appeals Tribunal lay under s. 243 of the Act which was broad enough to include the Charter issues).
Workers' Compensation - Topic 7122
Practice - Judicial review - Grounds - [See Workers' Compensation - Topic 7002 ].
Cases Noticed:
Morishita v. Richmond (Township) (1990), 67 D.L.R.(4th) 609 (B.C.C.A.), refd to. [para. 7].
Société des Acadiens du Nouveau-Brunswick Inc. and Association des conseillers scolaires francophones du Nouveau-Brunswick v. Minority Language School Board No. 50 and Association of Parents for Fairness in Education, Grand Falls District 50 Branch (1987), 82 N.B.R.(2d) 360; 208 A.P.R. 360 40 D.L.R. 704 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 7].
Association of Parents for Fairness in Education v. Minority Language School Board et al. - see Société des Acadiens du Nouveau-Brunswick Inc. and Association des conseillers scolaires francophones du Nouveau-Brunswick v. Minority Language School Board No. 50 and Association of Parents for Fairness in Education, Grand Falls District 50 Branch.
Wilson Fuel Co. v. Board of Commissioners of Public Utilities (N.S.) (1990), 95 N.S.R.(2d) 298; 251 A.P.R. 298 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 9].
Doward, Re, Decision No. 96-010D (N.S. Workers Comp. App. Trib.), refd to. [para. 14].
Statutes Noticed:
Functional Restoration (Multi-Faceted Pain Services) Program Regulations - see Workers' Compensation Act Regulations (N.S.).
Workers' Compensation Act, S.N.S. 1994-95, c. 10, sect. 183(7) [para. 5]; sect. 183(8) [para. 4]; sect. 183(9) [para. 5]; sect. 243(7)(d), sect. 243(7)(e) [para. 18]; sect. 256(3) [para. 8].
Workers' Compensation Act Regulations (N.S.), Functional Restoration (Multi-Faceted Pain Services) Program Regulations, sect. 6 [para. 16].
Authors and Works Noticed:
Nova Scotia, Workers' Compensation Board, Guideline for Assessment of Permanent Medical Impairment, generally [para. 11].
Counsel:
Thomas W. Jarmyn, for the appellant;
David P.S. Farrar, for the respondent.
This appeal was heard on October 7, 1996, before Freeman, Roscoe and Bateman, JJ.A., of the Nova Scotia Court of Appeal. On October 31, 1996, Roscoe, J.A., delivered the following judgment for the court.
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Hartling v. N.S. (A.G.),
...Compensation Board (N.S.), [1996] N.S.J. No. 433 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 137]. Geldart v. Workers' Compensation Board (N.S.) (1996), 155 N.S.R.(2d) 51; 457 A.P.R. 51 (C.A.), refd to. [para. Coughlan et al. v. Westminer Canada Ltd. et al. (1993), 125 N.S.R.(2d) 171; 349 A.P.R. 171 (C.A.), re......
-
Cape Breton Development Corp. v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Tribunal (N.S.) et al., 2008 NSCA 11
...Scotia (Workers' Compensation Board), [1996] N.S.J. No. 433, refd to. [para. 13]. Geldart v. Workers' Compensation Board (N.S.) (1996), 155 N.S.R.(2d) 51; 457 A.P.R. 51 (C.A.), refd to. [para. Brett et al. v. Amica Mature Lifestyles Inc. (2004), 226 N.S.R.(2d) 188 ; 714 A.P.R. 188 (C.A......
-
Workers' Compensation Board (P.E.I.) v. Cormier, (2010) 298 Nfld. & P.E.I.R. 328 (PEICA)
...et al. (1993), 125 N.S.R.(2d) 171 ; 349 A.P.R. 171 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 22]. Geldart v. Workers' Compensation Board (N.S.) (1996), 155 N.S.R.(2d) 51; 457 A.P.R. 51 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 23]. Cape Breton Development Corp. v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Tribunal (N.S.) et al. (20......
-
Hartling v. N.S. (A.G.),
...Compensation Board (N.S.), [1996] N.S.J. No. 433 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 137]. Geldart v. Workers' Compensation Board (N.S.) (1996), 155 N.S.R.(2d) 51; 457 A.P.R. 51 (C.A.), refd to. [para. Coughlan et al. v. Westminer Canada Ltd. et al. (1993), 125 N.S.R.(2d) 171; 349 A.P.R. 171 (C.A.), re......
-
Cape Breton Development Corp. v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Tribunal (N.S.) et al., 2008 NSCA 11
...Scotia (Workers' Compensation Board), [1996] N.S.J. No. 433, refd to. [para. 13]. Geldart v. Workers' Compensation Board (N.S.) (1996), 155 N.S.R.(2d) 51; 457 A.P.R. 51 (C.A.), refd to. [para. Brett et al. v. Amica Mature Lifestyles Inc. (2004), 226 N.S.R.(2d) 188 ; 714 A.P.R. 188 (C.A......
-
Workers' Compensation Board (P.E.I.) v. Cormier, (2010) 298 Nfld. & P.E.I.R. 328 (PEICA)
...et al. (1993), 125 N.S.R.(2d) 171 ; 349 A.P.R. 171 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 22]. Geldart v. Workers' Compensation Board (N.S.) (1996), 155 N.S.R.(2d) 51; 457 A.P.R. 51 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 23]. Cape Breton Development Corp. v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Tribunal (N.S.) et al. (20......