Gendis Inc. v. Canada (Attorney General) et al., (2007) 364 N.R. 399 (Motion)

JurisdictionFederal Jurisdiction (Canada)
CourtSupreme Court (Canada)
JudgeMcLachlin, C.J.C., Deschamps and Charron, JJ.
Citation(2007), 364 N.R. 399 (Motion)
Date08 February 2007
Subject MatterCRIMINAL LAW,CONSTITUTIONAL LAW,PRACTICE

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
4 practice notes
  • Kenne c. Canada (Citoyenneté et Immigration),
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • November 3, 2010
    ...la Citoyenneté et de l’Immigration), 2008 CF 252; Wai c. Canada (Ministre de la Citoyenneté et de l’Immigration), 2007 CF 364; Canada (Ministre de la Citoyenneté et de l’Immigration) c. Saini, 2001 CAF 311, [2002] 1 C.F. 294 KENNE v. CANADA [2012] 2 F.C.R......
  • R.J.F. v. C.M.F., (2014) 575 A.R. 125
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Alberta)
    • May 14, 2014
    ...from the mother might have upon the child: MacPhail v Karasek , 2006 ABCA 238 at paras 32-33, 409 AR 170, leave to appeal refused, (2007) 364 NR 399 (SCC). The trial judge's reasons do not demonstrate that he conducted that assessment. As this error is dispositive, it is unnecessary to cons......
  • Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) v. Oyema,
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • April 13, 2011
    ...c Saini , 2001 CAF 311, au para 26; Butar c Canada 2006 CF 1281 au para 9; Wai c Canada (Ministre de la Citoyenneté et de l'Immigration , 2007 CF 364, au para 14. [7] La deuxième question concerne l'appréciation de la bonne foi du mariage du défendeur par la SAI, à la lumière de la preuve d......
  • MacPhail v. Karasek, (2007) 364 N.R. 399 (Motion)
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court (Canada)
    • February 8, 2007
    ...Karasek (2007), 364 N.R. 399 (Motion) MLB - SCC Motion for leave Calvin James MacPhail v. Marcie Marie Karasek (31629) Indexed As: MacPhail v. Karasek Supreme Court of Canada McLachlin, C.J.C., Charron and Rothstein, JJ. February 8, 2007. Summary: This is a motion and therefore contains no ......
4 cases
  • Kenne c. Canada (Citoyenneté et Immigration)
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • November 3, 2010
    ...la Citoyenneté et de l’Immigration), 2008 CF 252; Wai c. Canada (Ministre de la Citoyenneté et de l’Immigration), 2007 CF 364; Canada (Ministre de la Citoyenneté et de l’Immigration) c. Saini, 2001 CAF 311, [2002] 1 C.F. 294 KENNE v. CANADA [2012] 2 F.C.R......
  • R.J.F. v. C.M.F., (2014) 575 A.R. 125
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Alberta)
    • May 14, 2014
    ...from the mother might have upon the child: MacPhail v Karasek , 2006 ABCA 238 at paras 32-33, 409 AR 170, leave to appeal refused, (2007) 364 NR 399 (SCC). The trial judge's reasons do not demonstrate that he conducted that assessment. As this error is dispositive, it is unnecessary to cons......
  • Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) v. Oyema
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • April 13, 2011
    ...c Saini , 2001 CAF 311, au para 26; Butar c Canada 2006 CF 1281 au para 9; Wai c Canada (Ministre de la Citoyenneté et de l'Immigration , 2007 CF 364, au para 14. [7] La deuxième question concerne l'appréciation de la bonne foi du mariage du défendeur par la SAI, à la lumière de la preuve d......
  • MacPhail v. Karasek, (2007) 364 N.R. 399 (Motion)
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court (Canada)
    • February 8, 2007
    ...Karasek (2007), 364 N.R. 399 (Motion) MLB - SCC Motion for leave Calvin James MacPhail v. Marcie Marie Karasek (31629) Indexed As: MacPhail v. Karasek Supreme Court of Canada McLachlin, C.J.C., Charron and Rothstein, JJ. February 8, 2007. Summary: This is a motion and therefore contains no ......